CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJRBSPUBLICATION RECORD

Legal protection justice collaborators in corruption justice system

Mochamad Ali Asgar · I Nyoman Nurjaya · Bambang Sugiri · Tunggul Anshari

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2021 · Vol. 10 / Issue 6 · 306-316

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS1

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations2Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:49 UTC

Mendeley · Readers—No verified count available

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

Corruption is a crime that is difficult to eradicate because the perpetrators of corruption usually have a strong economic and political position so that corruption is classified as a white-collar crime, crimes as business, economic crimes, official crime, and abuse of power. The purpose of this research is to know the urgency of providing legal protection for witnesses to perpetrators who are willing to cooperate with law enforcement in the investigation of Corruption Crimes. This research is normative legal research using the statute approach, philosophical approach, and case approach. The results can be explained that the urgency of providing legal protection for perpetrators of witnesses who are willing to cooperate with law enforcement in the investigation of Corruption Crimes because Justice Collaborator is the main actor who can help uncover a crime because it has the potential to have evidence to drag the main perpetrator and other suspects in. Third, the future arrangements for perpetrator witnesses who are willing to cooperate with law enforcement still cannot be used as a strong legal basis regarding the right of commutation of sentence for Justice Collaborators in criminal justice by law enforcement officers and many have weaknesses, especially in terms of commutation of sentences for Justice Collaborators for their testimonies in assisting law enforcement officers but are only used as considerations by judges without any binding power that obliges judges to provide leniency.

Keywords: {'name': 'Corruption, Legal Protection, Collaborators, Criminal Justice.'}

Authors & affiliations

Mochamad Ali Asgar
Affiliation not supplied

I Nyoman Nurjaya
Affiliation not supplied

Bambang Sugiri
Affiliation not supplied

Tunggul Anshari
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Adji, I.S. (2009). Korupsi Kebijakan Aparatur Negara & Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, Diadit Media.

Albanese, J.S. (2016). Kejahatan Terorganisasi (Organized Crime) Akar dan Perkembanganya. Jakarta, Prenadamedia group.

Alkostar, A. (2008). Korupsi Politik Di Negara Modern. Yogyakarta, FH UII Press,

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1666879

Amiruddin, and Asikin, Z. (2016). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta, RajaGrafindo,

Atmasasmita, R. (2011). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Husodo, A.T., et.al, (2016). Evaluasi dan Roadmap Penegakan Hukum KPK 2012-2015, Jakarta, Indonesia Corruption Watch. Available on https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/Evaluasi%20%26%20Roadmap%20Penegakan%20Hukum%20KPK%202012.pdf

Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta, Bayumedia.

Ilyas, A.(2018). Justice Collaborator: Strategi Mengngkap Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yogyakarta, Genta Publishing.

Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR). (2016). Problem Penetapan Bagi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama Masih Terjadi di Pengadilan, Hakim dan Jaksa Masih Belum Sepakat Soal Status Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama, Available at https://icjr.or.id/problem-penetapan-bagi-pelaku-yang-bekerjasama-masih-terjadi-di-pengadilan-hakim-dan-jaksa-masih-belum-sepakat-soal-status-pelaku-yang-bekerjasama/

Manalu, R.Y. (2015). Justice Collaborator Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Crimen, 4(1), 152-163. Available on https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/7011/6516

DOI: 10.25216/jhp.3.2.2014.101-116

Napitupulu, E. (2014). LPSK: Peran dan Pengalaman Penegak Hukum Terkait Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban untuk Beberapa Kasus (Hak Asasi Manusia, KDRT, TPPO dan Korupsi. Jurnal LPSK, 4(1). https://lpsk.go.id/publikasi/detailjurnal/2405

Pramono, R.W. (2016). Pemberantasan Korupsi dan Pidana Lainnya: Sebuah Perspektif Jaksa dan Guru Besar. Jakarta, Kompas Media Nusantara.

Semendawai, A.S. (2013). Memahami Whistleblower, Jakarta, LPSK RI.

Soekanto, S. (2012). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta, PT Raja Grafindo. Persada.

Widjaya, F. (2012). Whistleblowers dan Justice Collaborator dalam Perspektif Hukum. Jakarta, Penaku,