Legal protection for debtors in determining the application requirements for suspension of debt payment obligations

Abstract

The establishment of the Bankruptcy Law aims to overcome the difficulties of the business world in terms of debt and receivables in continuing their activities. However, in practice the PKPU and Bankruptcy institutions are used as a means of resolving ordinary civil disputes, this is due to Article 225 paragraph (3) and (5) in conjunction with Article 222 paragraph (1) and (2). The purpose of this study is to analyze the ratio legis for debtors in relation to the ratio legis Article 225 paragraph (3) and paragraph (5) associated with the purpose of establishing Bankruptcy and Suspension Of Debt Payment Obligations (UUK-PKPU). This research is normative legal research with a statute approach, the case approach, historical approach, comparative approach, and the conceptual approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary. The analysis technique uses legal logic, legal interpretation teleologically, hermeneutics, grammatically, and systematically. The results of the study indicate that the ratio legis regarding PKPU as regulated in Article 225 paragraph (3) and paragraph (5) has a vague norm when it comes to the purpose of establishing UUK-PKPU, that PKPU is a means for debtors so that debtors can restructure their debts. So that no rights are given to debtors who are not present at the PKPU session resulting in no legal protection for the debtor to defend himself by conveying the reasons for the debtor's absence.

Keywords: {'name': 'Ratio legis, Bankruptcy, Debt Payment Obligation, UUK-PKPU '}

Authors & affiliations

Zeto Bachri
Affiliation not supplied

Suhariningsih Suhariningsih
Affiliation not supplied

Sukarmi Sukarmi
Affiliation not supplied

Iwan Permadi
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Amrullah, M. (2016). Azas Integritas dalam Sistem Hukum Kepailitan sebagaiSarana Hukum Menyelesaikan Masalah Utang Piutang secara Adil, Cepat, dan Efektif. Malang, Brawijaya University.

Anisah, S. (2008). Perlindungan Kepentingan Kreditor dan Debitor dalam Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Depok, Indonesia University.

DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss2.art3

DOI: 10.17977/um019v3i12018p015

Arbijoto. (2005). Kepastian, Keadilan, dan Manfaat Undang-Undang Kepailitan Indonesia bagi Debitor dan Kreditor, Suatu Tinjauan Yuridis Filosofis Tentang Syarat-syarat Kepailitan. Depok, Indonesia University.

Damlah, J. (2017). Akibat Hukum Putusan Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Lex Crimen, 6(2), 91-98. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/15348/14896

David, L.K. (2005). Insolvency Law in East Asia. Roman Tomasic, Ashgate Publising Campany.

Hadjon, P.M. (1994). Pengkajian Ilmu Hukum Dogmatik (Normatif). Surabaya: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga.

DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.3.2015.399-418

Isnaeni, M. (2016). Pengantar Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan. Surabaya, PT. Revka Petra Media.

Nasution, B.J. (2008). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Bandung, Mandar Maju.

Rahardjo, S. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung, PT.Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rahardjo, S. (2010). Teori Hukum Strategi tertib manusia linmas ruang dan General. Yogyakarta, Genta Publishing.

Rasjidi, L., & Sidharta, B.A. (1994). Filsafat Hukum Madzab dan Refleksi. Bandung, PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.

DOI: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v6i1.128

Setiono, (2004). Rule Of Law (supremasi hukum). Surakarta, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Shubhan, H. (2008). Hukum Kepailitan: Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan. First Edition. Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Simanjuntak, P. J. (2005). Manajemen dan Evaluasi Kerja. Jakarta, Lembaga Penerbit FEUI.

Wijaya, A.A., Murniati, R., and Trijaya, M.W. (2019). Hak Eksekusi Kreditor Separatis terhadap Benda Agunan dalam Kepailitan. Pactum Law Journal, 2(3), 713-724. http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/15062/1/1685-5414-1-PB.pdf

Zuaeha, M. (2016). Konsep Kep?ilit?n y?ng Memberik?n Perlindung?n Hukum Terh?d?p Debitor Perus?h??n Y?ng Propektif. Malang, Brawijaya University.