The role of incubator classification on performance of incubators in Kenya.

Abstract

The study sought to assess the importance of classifying incubators based on the programs offered for optimum performance. Client selection criteria were assessed through three constructs namely: models that fit program goals, uniqueness of ideas, and standard selection tool. A mixed cross-sectional and causal design was adopted and a census was carried out targeting all the 51 incubators. Primary data was collected with an incubator program as a grouping/ cluster variable yielding a multilevel data structure with incubator centres nested in programs. Linear mixed effect models were fitted using Stata to assess the study objective taking into account the fixed effects for the incubator centre level (level-1) and random effects for the program level (level-2). The uniqueness of ideas was found to have a significant fixed effect on performance at level one while at level two, the study found significant random intercepts of incubator centre performance across the programs. Models that match program goals and standard selection tools were also found to have significant random slopes as level two random covariates in the model. Based on the findings of significant random slopes, the study concluded that incubator classification is key for client selection criteria and enhances incubator performance.

Keywords: {'name': 'Incubator Center, Classification, Client Selection Criteria; Multi-level'}

Authors & affiliations

Miriti Jane Kinya
Affiliation not supplied

Kenneth Lawrance Wanjau
Affiliation not supplied

Nyagweth Ebenezer Odeyo
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1007/s10961-018-9661-9

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.054

Babbie, Earl R. (1990). Survey research methods. Belmont, Calif. :Wadsworth Pub. Co.

Barrow, C. (2001). Incubators: a realist's guide to the world's new business accelerators. Wiley.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.005

Bugliarello, G. (1998). Knowledge parks and incubators. The Handbook of Technology Management, 1, 41-49.

Chimi, C. J., & Russell, D. L. (2009, November). The Likert scale: A proposal for improvement using quasi-continuous variables. In Information Systems Education Conference, Washington, DC (pp. 1-10).

Cooper, D.R., & Schindler, P.S., (2011).Business Research Methods.(11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Dee, N., Gill, D., Lacher, R., Livesey, F., & Minshall, T. (2012). A review of research on the role and effectiveness of business incubation for high-growth start-ups. University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing, 42.

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub2

DOI: 10.1108/17515630910956570

DOI: 10.1068/c0215

Hmelo, C. E., Williams, S. M., Vye, N. J., Goldman, S. R., & Bransford, J. D. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1993). A longitudinal study of the effects of anchored instruction on mathematical problem solving transfer.

Israel, G. D., (2012). Sampling: Determining Sample Size. (U. o. Extension, Ed.)

DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-10-00394

DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v7i1.857

Kuratko, D. F., & LaFollette, W. R. (1987). Small business incubators for local economic development. Economic Development Review, 5(2), 49.

DOI: 10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355

DOI: 10.4337/9781786432797.00009

DOI: 10.1080/10618600.2017.1330207

DOI: 10.5367/000000006776928663

DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00059.x

DOI: 10.1109/TEM.1987.6498875

DOI: 10.1108/JSBED-09-2014-0152

UKBI, (2009). The Business Incubation Development Framework, Business Incubation. Birmingham.

DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i1/2553