Model of legal protection for aircraft property guarantee in Indonesia

Abstract

Airplanes are legal objects of high economic value (high valuable assets) so that airplanes can be used as assets to guarantee the risk of debt agreements. The regulatory provisions related to guarantees for aircraft are based on the provisions of Law Number 15 of 1992 concerning Aviation which stipulates that aircraft can be used as collateral through a mortgage guarantee institution, but in its development, the regulation was replaced by Law Number 1 of 2009 concerning Aviation, which in its latest arrangement eliminates the ability of aircraft to be subject to collateral. This condition creates a legal vacuum because it does not provide alternative settlements and adjustments to aircraft that have been and will become objects of guarantee. So based on these conditions, it is necessary to have a regulatory model that can be used as a reference in the formulation of regulations related to the continuation of aircraft as an object of guarantee. The regulatory model referred to in this paper is in the form of formulating a regulatory pattern that provides a comprehensive overview of the Guarantee Institution, Implementation Mechanism, Guarantee Execution Mechanism, and Guarantee Implementation Authority that adapts to the regulatory system in Indonesia. To describe the regulatory model, the research method used is a normative juridical method based on a statutory and conceptual approach. With the aim of being able to comprehensively present a form of a continuous pattern of arrangements that will form a protection system for creditors by focusing on the Guarantee Institution, the guarantee implementation mechanism, the guarantee execution mechanism, and the Guarantee Implementing Authority for aircraft.

Keywords: {'name': 'Regulatory Model, Legal Protection, Aircraft, Material Guarantee'}

Authors & affiliations

Putri Purbasari Raharningtyas Marditia
Affiliation not supplied

Hans Sebastian Adiwinata
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Andhanaricwari, D. P., Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Praktik Jaminan Pesawat Udara Ditinjau Dari Hukum Jaminan Indonesia. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 65-79.

Badriyah, S. M. (2014). Problematika Pesawat Udara Sebagai Jaminan Pada Perjanjian Kredit Dalam Pengembangan Industri Penerbangan. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 43(4), 546-552.

Bisset, M. (2017). Aviation Finance & Leasing. London: Clyde & Co LLP, Law Business Research.

Bohlander, M. (2008). Principles of German criminal law. Portland: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Brown, J. T., & Mannsfeldt, U. (1987). Security Interests in Aircraft and Spare Parts V: Germany. Int'l Bus. Law., 15, 224.

DOI: 10.1163/157181010X512567

DOI: 10.1186/s13690-021-00544-0

Hartanto, J. A. (2015). The Legal Development of Guarantee in Indonesia. JL Pol'y & Globalization, 36, 57-61.

Juwana, H. (2001). Teaching International Law in Indonesia. Sing. J. Int'l & Comp. L., 5, 412.

Keaveny, C., & Murray, S. (2013). Aviation finance and leasing. Offshore Investment, 239, 12-14.

DOI: 10.3905/JSF.2009.15.1.109

Shadrina, S. I. (2011). Cape Town Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 8(3), 596-612.

Wirsamulia, F. (2021). The Legal Problem of A?rcraft Mortgage in Indones?a. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24, 1-10.

DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.B1126.0982S919

DOI: 10.14710/dilrev.5.1.2020.19-33

DOI: 10.1093/iclqaj/35.4.975

DOI: 10.1201/9781003180128-4