Quo Vadis Trisakti, Semanggi I and II (TSS) case as a crime against humanity based on International Criminal Law perspective
Dellvin Sergio ORCID ↗ · Asmin Fransiska ORCID ↗ · Tiffanny Natania
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022 · Vol. 11 / Issue 1 · 221-228
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:16 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:16 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The Trisakti Semanggi I and II (TSS) occurred in 1998 and 1999 during the reformation movement towards democracy upholding in Indonesia. Several students and people have been killed and injured in those days. The National Commission on Human Rights (KOMNAS HAM) has investigated the case and concluded that the case has a gross human rights violation aspect. The documents have reached the General Attorney of the Republic of Indonesia. However, there are obstacles faced by the victims and their families, the legal debate on whether the TSS can be classified as a gross violation of human rights or not. The Attorney General stated this doubt in their meeting with the Indonesian House of Representatives. The government's political will has been examined through the Indonesian Constitution in this matter. This article explores the burden of sufficient proof to conclude the gross human rights violation in the TSS case. Under the thorough independent investigation done by KPP HAM, the Trisakti Semanggi I and II (TSS) fulfills the elements of past gross violation of human rights known as a crime against humanity. The TSS case has met elements ruled under the ICTY and ICTR Statute 14, such as Article 7 of the Rome Statute 15. The article will also provide current discourse in a legal argument between national institutions regarding the case and what should be done afterward. The research uses a qualitative method with case studies related to the crimes against humanity at the national and international levels.
Keywords: {'name': 'Human Rights, Trisakti and Semanggi Case, Crime Against Humanity'}
Authors & affiliations
Dellvin Sergio
Affiliation not supplied
Asmin Fransiska
Affiliation not supplied
Tiffanny Natania
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chq080
Arnold, R. (2004). The Prosecution of Terrorism as a Crime against Humanity. Zeitschrift für ausllndisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 979-1000.
Billah, M. M. (2009). Human Rights National Commission (Komnas HAM) in Human Rights Enforcement1. Human Rights and the Indonesian Security Sector: 2009 Almanac, 47, 1-419.
DOI: 10.1163/9789004502840_022
Crawshaw, R., & Holmström, L. (2008). 12. Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law. In Essential Texts on Human Rights for the Police (pp. 497-506). Brill Nijhoff.
DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v2i3.697
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-1074-8_7
DOI: 10.1163/9789004342217_005
Hendola, F. (2018). ‘Tragedy’and Space of Commemoration: An Inquiry to Semanggi Tragedy’s Significance on Jakarta’s Urban Space. International Journal of Built Environment and Scientific Research, 2(1), 1-14.
DOI: 10.1017/ilm.2019.31
Juwana, H. (2003). Special Report-Assessing Indonesia's Human Rights Practice in the Post-Soeharto Era: 1998-2003. Sing. J. Int'l & Comp. L., 7, 644.
Kartika, N. H., Sripokangkul, S., & Dharmawan, A. S. (2020). The Case of Human Rights Violations Against Munir Who Has Never Found the Bright Spot. Journal of Local Governance and Innovation, 4(1), 307-316.
DOI: 10.2307/3139255
DOI: 10.19184/jseahr.v4i1.13597
DOI: 10.2307/1602291
Permanasari, A. (2018). Humanitarian Law Principles on the Use of Drones in Internal Armed Conflict: An Indonesian National Law Perspective. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 18(3), 309-318.
DOI: 10.1163/9789004486560
DOI: 10.4324/9780429455247-5
Shahbazi, A. (2015). Legality: Positivistic Foundation of the Penal Institutions in International Law. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 3(5), 75-93.
Sujatmoko, A. (2019). State Respons?b?l?ty and V?ct?m’s Reparat?ons in Indones?a: Theory of Law Perspect?ve. terAs Law Review, 1(1), 1-27.
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173849
DOI: 10.20473/mkp.V31I12018.14-23
Zerner, C. (2014). 36. Through a Green Lens: The Construction of Customary Environmental Law and Community in Indonesia’s Maluku Islands. In The Law and Society Reader II (pp. 343-350). New York University Press.