The influence of the Kirkpatrick evaluation level on the quality of learning systems in UPBJJ-UT Ternate students: Empirical study on open university
Efendi M. · Zainuddin Zainuddin · MS Ahmad
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022 · Vol. 11 / Issue 1 · 298-304
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 00:52 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 00:52 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This research aims to analyze the influence of the Kirkpatrick evaluation level on the quality of learning systems in UPBJJ-UT Ternate students. Kirkpatrick evaluation was conducted through four levels: reaction, learning, behavior, and results. This research is a quantitative study with a sample of UPBJJ-UT Ternate Students who registered in 2020.1 and followed tutorials in Ternate, Falabisahaya, and Bobong. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling with a sample number of 84 respondents. Data collection techniques using questionnaires. The data analysis technique used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis with smart-PLS static tools. The results showed that all attributes of Kirkpatrick's evaluation level of reaction, learning, behavior, and result levels had a positive and significant effect on the quality of learning at UPBJJ-UT Ternate open university.
Keywords: {'name': 'Reaction Level, Learning Level, Behavior Level, Result Level, Kirkpatrick Evaluation, Open University'}
Authors & affiliations
Efendi M.
Affiliation not supplied
Zainuddin Zainuddin
Affiliation not supplied
MS Ahmad
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.21831/reid.v4i2.22495
Djarojat, O. (2019). Katalog Sistem Penyelenggaraan Universitas Terbuka 2019/2020. Universitas Terbuka.
Effendi, M., Zainuddin, Ahmad, M. S., & Sallu, Z. (2021). Quality Evaluation Of Learning Systems In Open Universities (Ut) Using Kirkpatrick Method Based On Website. Psychology and Education Journal, 58, 2273–2279. http://psychologyandeducation.net/pae/index.php/pae/article/view/4232
DOI: 10.29210/1202221160
DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806
DOI: 10.1504/IJMDA.2017.10008574
DOI: 10.1109/IITA.2008.168
Mukhid, A. (2007). Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan Melalui Sistem Pembelajaran Yang Tepat. Tadrîs, 2(1), 120–133.
Nell, C. E., & Cant, M. C. (2014). Determining student perceptions regarding the most important service features and overall satisfaction with the service quality of a higher education institution. Management - Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 19(2), 63–87.
Partner, C. (2009). Implementing the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model Plus. Retrieved from http://www.coe.wayne.edu/eval/pdf.
DOI: 10.1002/nha3.20178
DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/7590
DOI: 10.1007/BF02299676