Exploring the impact of social responsibility on staff engagement in Ghanaian Universities:

Abstract

Ghanaian universities have embraced a corporate identity and are actively participating in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), which is referred to as University Social Responsibility (USR). The purpose of this is to enhance the perception of identification (organisational identity) and promote employee involvement. This research examines the effect of University Social Responsibility (USR) on the level of involvement and commitment of staff members in Ghanaian institutions. It also proposes that the sense of identity plays a role in mediating the relationship between USR and staff engagement. This study utilised a cross-sectional survey methodology. The poll utilised a two-stage multi-stage sampling procedure to choose 412 participants. The survey utilised a validated questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale. The questionnaire had a Cronbach's alpha coefficient (?) greater than 0.70. The data acquired from this questionnaire was customised for the survey. The data collected were configured and subjected to Structural Equation Modelling for analysis at a significance level of p<.05 using the SMART pls software. The findings indicate that identification perception does not significantly and directly predict the mediation effect of internal CSR on employee engagement (beta=0.008; t<1.96; p=0.439: p>0.05), and external CSR on employee engagement (beta=0.002; t<1.96; p=0.443: p>0.05) in the surveyed Ghanaian universities. The study concluded that the impression of identification did not operate as a mediator in the predicted association between the internal and external corporate social responsibility activities of the universities and employee engagement. According to the findings and conclusion, Ghanaian universities should take into account several elements and adopt a comprehensive approach when aiming to enhance employee job engagement. It is important not to exclusively concentrate on employee identification with the institution. It is advisable for the administration of Ghanaian institutions to develop efficient employee-focused engagement strategies and activities, both internally and externally, to boost the welfare of their workers, promote a sense of belonging, and improve overall performance.

Keywords: {'name': 'Employee engagement, identification perceptions, Ghanaian universities, structural equation modelling, university social responsibility'}

Authors & affiliations

Emmanuel Barima Agyemang Prempeh
Affiliation not supplied

Dennis Yao Dzansi
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.08.010

DOI: 10.1177/0149206317691575

DOI: 10.1177/21582440211040113

Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 7, 263-295.

DOI: 10.1108/JOEPP-08-2014-0042

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.06.005

DOI: 10.5465/amr.1989.4278999

Atieq, M. Q. (2019). Comparative analysis of employee engagement in employees’ generation X, Y, and Z. Al-Amwal: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syari'ah, 11(2), 285-299.

DOI: 10.1108/JHR-04-2020-0102

DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-01-2020-0010

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.07.004

Boro?, S. (2008). Organizational identification: Theoretical and empirical analyses of competing conceptualisations. Romanian Association for Cognitive Science, XII(1), 1–27.

DOI: 10.1177/1059601114562246

DOI: 10.1002/sd.2256

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.195

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-017-3656-6

Duus, R., & Harnish, K. D. (2018). Organizational identification and employee engagement: An integrated analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(5), 363-376.

DOI: 10.5296/ijhrs.v5i3.8376

European Commission (2015). EU-University social responsibility (USR) project: Recommendations on the implementation of USR in higher education institutions.

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16101731

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1928-3

DOI: 10.3390/su15032777

DOI: 10.1108/JWL-09-2013-0070

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1969-7

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00796

Gomez, J. P. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in higher education institutions. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 3(1), 396-405.

DOI: 10.1002/job.2170

DOI: 10.1108/SAJBS-10-2018-0117

Hamid, M. K. A., Ishak, R., & Shamsudin, F. M. (2014). The impact of organizational identification on employee job performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 532-538.

DOI: 10.7819/rbgn.v17i55.2647

Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., Agrawal, S., & Plowman, S. K. (2020). The relationship between engagement at work and organizational outcomes. Washington: Gallup Poll Consulting University Press, Inc.

Harvard Business Review (2019). The business case for purpose. Retrieved on January 6, 2024 from https://hbr.org/the-business-case-for-purpose

DOI: 10.1108/JPBM-10-2022-4193

DOI: 10.1108/MD-07-2021-0993

DOI: 10.1002/job.694

Kim, K., Kim, K. J., & Kim, M. J. (2021). The impact of employee engagement on innovative behaviour: A multilevel study in higher education. Journal of Business Research, 129, 303-314.

DOI: 10.1080/0965254X.2020.1795912

Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

DOI: 10.1002/csr.1823

Kruse, K. (2015). Employee engagement defined. Forbes. Retrieved on February 9, 2024 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinkruse/employee-engagement- defined/?sh=

d7b2aa62d35

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04145-4

Larrán, M., & Andrades, J. A. (2015). University social responsibility: Analysis and perspectives through stakeholder theory. Revista de Educación, 369, 224-246.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.09.002

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2021.106031

DOI: 10.1177/03400352211069157

DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.495

DOI: 10.1108/PR-04-2015-0111

Ohly, S., Schmitt, B., & Almer-Jarz, S. W. (2017). The role of organizational identification in the relationship between work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 40(6) 864-877.

DOI: 10.5590/IJAMT.2017.16.1.04

DOI: 10.2478/subboec-2022-0012

Reiser, D. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in higher education. Journal of Education for Business, 82(6), 309-318.

Reiser, M. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in higher education. Journal of Education for Business, 83(5), 270-277.

Ridho, T. (2017). CSR in Indonesia: Company’s perception and implementation. The EUrASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-economic Dynamics, 3(4), 68-74.

Rodriguez-Dominguez, L., Sánchez-Hernández, M. I., & Delgado-Ramos, G. C. (2009). University social responsibility: An analysis of Spanish universities. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(2), 129-143.

DOI: 10.1007/s10997-019-09472-2

DOI: 10.1108/JOEPP-06-2018-0034

DOI: 10.1057/s41270-019-00058-3

DOI: 10.3390/su8050493

DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2016.1201905

Stoyanov, P. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and corporate image building. Scientific Journal Economics and Finance, 8, 1

Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61-76). Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States: Academic Press.

DOI: 10.1108/00251740910929777

DOI: 10.4324/9781315663388

DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420090207

DOI: 10.4337/9781783479665.00015

DOI: 10.1111/inr.12886

Zhang, H., Kong, D., & Lu, W. (2021). How does corporate social responsibility impact financial performance? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 315, 128314.