Implementation of the new higher education curriculum in Indonesia: perceptions and participation in the process
Erna Handayani ORCID ↗ · Sri Wahyuni · Wanda Nugroho Yanuarto ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022 · Vol. 11 / Issue 3 · 237-249
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 00:51 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 00:51 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
According to the objectives of this study, perceptions, and participation of the user community in responding to policy "Independent Learning Program – Independent Campus (MBKM)" will be determined. The quantitative approach used in this study was centered on the survey as the research design chosen for the study. It surveyed 593 members of the user community, who included lecturers, students, stakeholders, and parents, among other people. The structural equation model statistical analysis is used for data analysis. On the other hand, perceptions and participation are variables that have been observed. In this study, the relationship between perception and participation among the user community in responding to the policy of the MBKM program in Indonesia was investigated using quantitative methods. The following research procedures were used: (1) Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was used to determine the factor analysis of each construct; perceptions and participation; (2) Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to construct the instrument in order to obtain a fit model; and (3) Structural Equation Model (SEM) was used to determine the relationship between perceptions and user participation. The fit index test was performed using the following model criteria: Chi-Square, Chi-Square/df, TLI, CFI, NFI, and RMSEA. In addition, the following are the findings of this study: (1) The EFA analysis revealed that the perceptions construct contained three valid sub-constructs, while the user participation constructs contained four valid sub-constructs; (2) The CFA analysis revealed that there was a strong link between the three sub-constructs of perceptions and the four valid sub-constructs of user participation (benefits, convenience, and beliefs; 0,943; 0,970; 0,870 respectively).
Keywords: {'name': 'Perceptions, user participation, user community, curriculum programs'}
Authors & affiliations
Erna Handayani
Affiliation not supplied
Sri Wahyuni
Affiliation not supplied
Wanda Nugroho Yanuarto
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.4108/eai.31-8-2021.2313732
DOI: 10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16207
DOI: 10.30605/biogenerasi.v6i1.491
Amalia, M. (2021). Challenges and Efforts of Legal Education in The Pandemic Time in Improving the Role of Education Through MBKM. Proceeding International Conference on Science and Engineering, 4(2), 124–139.
DOI: 10.25139/fn.v4i1.3357
Byrne, B. M. (2019). Structural Equation Modeling with Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 5(2), 365–367.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00388_4.x
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method. In Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.144
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. In Pearson Education Limited.
Hairunisya, N. (2021). Analysis Of Teaching Material Development Problems (Implementation Of Independent Learning And Merdeka Campus). Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(3), 6984–6994.
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.340
I., R. Gay, Geoffrey E. Mills, P. W. A. (2012). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications.
DOI: 10.30743/mkd.v5i2.4353
Kline, R. B. (2017). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Journal Basic of Education, 3(21), 445–458.
DOI: 10.47076/jkpis.v4i1.60
Kotler, P. (2005). Manajemen Pemasaran edisi ke sebelas. PT Indeks.
Krishnapatria, K. (2021). MBKM Curriculum in English Studies Program: Challenges and Opportunities. ELT in Focus, 4(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.35706/eltinfc.v4i1.5276
DOI: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100213
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.696
DOI: 10.4018/9781591404743.ch006.ch000
DOI: 10.29303/prospek.v2i2.144
DOI: 10.53602/pwjridhe.v1i1.20
DOI: 10.15294/jscpe.v6i2.51706
DOI: 10.46627/sipose.v1i1.8
DOI: 10.26499/ijea.v3i2.84
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.028
DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.210120.149
Rahmawati, Y. (2021). Implementation of MBKM Activities in Japanese Literature Study Program. Journal of Indonesian Independent Learning, 01(01), 1–3.
Rohinsa, M. (2020). Developing Student Engagement in Innovation Research in The Era of MBKM. Journal Basic of Education, 3(4), 41–54.
Rohmad, M. A. (2020). The Authority of Teacher in Merdeka Belajar Discourse. TARBIYA ISLAMIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keislaman, 10(2), 43–54.
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/ry9b3
Sakti, M. N. S. F., & Darsim, S. F. H. (2020). Family Role in Optimizing ’Study From Home’With Merdeka Belajar Approach. Proceeding International Conference on Islamic Education “Innovative Learning Designs to Empower Students in Digital Works,” 5(November), 122–129.
Salam, A., & Irawan, E. (2021). Implementation of the Merdeka Program as Efforts to Improve Competitive Village Economic Development?: ( A Case Study of the Implementation of the UTS Assisted Village Merdeka Program in 19 Villages in Sumbawa Regency ). International Journal of Arts and Social Science, 4(3), 257–268.
Sandi, S. (2021). Responsive to the Use of Daily Reading Journal Media in the Concept of Kampus Merdeka: The Efforts to Improve Reading Literacy. Proceeding ISLALE 2021, The 3rd International Seminar on of Language, Art, and Literature Education, October, 102–112.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100010
DOI: 10.47747/jbme.v2i2.230
DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.210202.076
Suhendra, A. D., Asworowati, R. D., & Ismawati, T. (2020). Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka Dalam Kurikulum Program Studi Pada Perguruan Tinggi. Akrab Juara, 5(1), 43–54.
Surendran, P. (2019). Technology Acceptance Model: A Survey of Literature. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 2(4), 175–178. https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v2i4.161
DOI: 10.25139/fn.v4i1.3357
Tabachnick, B & Fidell, L. (2014). Using Multivariate Statistics. In Person Education Limited.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mastery of Memory and Thinking. Mind in Society, 38–51. https://doi.org/(Original manuscripts [ca. 1930-1934])
DOI: 10.33019/society.v8i2.234
Yusuf, F. A. (2021). The independent campus program for higher education in Indonesia: The role of government support and the readiness of institutions, lecturers and students. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(2), 280–304.
Zulfikar, R. (2021). Perception, Level of Trust and Behavior of Indonesian Lecturers in Responding “Kampus Merdeka” Policy. Journal of Advanced Research Design, 1(4), 44–58.