Reimagining local government's role in promoting inclusivity: A coproduction pathway for cities

Abstract

Promoting inclusion requires acknowledging and tackling many aspects and overcoming obstacles and disparities that hinder equitable access to opportunities, resources, and services. It is worth mentioning that the hierarchical method of creating policies and providing services in urban areas frequently neglects to consider the varied requirements and viewpoints of different communities. Therefore, it is necessary to further investigate approaches to policymaking and service delivery that take into account the different needs and perspectives of the community. This article examines the City of Johannesburg as a case study to investigate a collaborative approach for municipal governments to enhance inclusion in urban areas. Using a qualitative research design, this study gathers data by analysing documents and reviewing existing literature. The data are examined using the process of content analysis. The report reveals that coproduction approaches enhance inclusivity in the City of Johannesburg by fostering collaboration opportunities between local governments and communities. It illustrates that when individuals participate in the formulation of policies and the provision of services, local governments may more effectively access the many needs and viewpoints of the community and develop policies and services that are more efficient and inclusive. The report also emphasises the difficulties linked to the implementation of a coproduction strategy and suggests the need to enhance capabilities and establish trust and communication among stakeholders.

Keywords: {'name': 'Coproduction, City of Johannesburg, inclusivity, local government, citizens'}

Authors & affiliations

Lewis Edwin Chigova
Affiliation not supplied

Tawanda Nyikadzino
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1177/0042098012444884

DOI: 10.1332/030557321X16115951196045

DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.06.003

DOI: 10.4324/9781849773652

DOI: 10.1163/9789004387942_006

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_16

DOI: 10.1093/cdj/35.1.41

DOI: 10.1515/9781553393191

Bradford, N. J. (2004). Place matters and multi-level governance: Perspectives on a new urban policy paradigm. Canadian Policy Research Networks. Available at: https://irpp.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/assets/po/canadas-cities/Bradford.pdf. [Accessed February 10, 2024].

DOI: 10.2307/975300

Bullock, H., Mountford, J., & Stanley, R. (2001). Better policy-making. London: Centre for Management and Policy Studies.

DOI: 10.4337/9781786433862.00012

Cerna, L., Mezzanotte, C., Rutigliano, A., Brussino, O., Santiago, P., Borgonovi, F., & Guthrie, C. (2021). Promoting inclusive education for diverse societies: A conceptual framework. Paris: OECD Education Working Papers No. 260.

DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.02.002

Chigova, L. E., & Hofisi, C. (2021). The utility of co-production as an innovation in local governance in South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 56(4.1), 958-971.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-35229-4_10

DOI: 10.3390/admsci11020059

DOI: 10.1111/spol.12459

CoJ. (2023). Public Participation Outcomes Report 2023/24 Johannesburg: City of Johannesburg Available at: https://www.joburg.org.za/documents_/Documents/Public%20Participation%20Outcomes%20Report%202023-24.pdf. [accessed, January 15, 2024].

DOI: 10.1080/19491247.2017.1331593

DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.019

DOI: 10.1002/pad.281

Durose, C., Mangan, C., Needham, C., Rees, J., & Hilton, M. (2013). Transforming local public services through co-production. Swindon: Arts and Humanities Research Council.

DOI: 10.1177/0952076715572362

DOI: 10.1002/sd.1745

DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4202

DOI: 10.3390/su13169321

DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12197

DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.05.015

DOI: 10.1177/0095399713481601

Helling, A. L., Berthet, R. S., & Warren, D. (2005). Linking community empowerment, decentralized governance, and public service provision through a local development framework. Washington, DC: World Bank.

DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2018.1491597

DOI: 10.2307/3325512

DOI: 10.4324/9781003008385-5

DOI: 10.36615/9781776402304-08

DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1022

Malena, C., & McNeil, M. (Eds.). (2010). Social accountability in Africa: An introduction. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Mangai, M. S., Masiya, T., Murwamuila, L. L., & Holtzhausen, N. (2022). The importance of a police-community partnership (co-production): A study of the City of Johannesburg. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 16(1), 924-939.

Mchunu, N., & Theron, F. (2015). Co-production of public services: An innovative participatory approach to strengthen local democracy in South Africa. Available at: https://www.hessequa.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Co-production-of-Public-Services-_-N.-Mchunu-F.-Theron.pdf. [Accessed October 20, 2023].

DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.12.003

DOI: 10.1177/09562478211035608

DOI: 10.1177/0956247818791931

DOI: 10.4324/9780203386149

Mokgere, T. (2019). Co-production of public parks in the Johannesburg Inner-city: The cases of End Street South, End Street North, Ekhaya and Pullinger Kop Parks. [Master's dissertation]. [Johannesburg]: University of the Witwatersrand.

Munsamy, D. (2022). An integrated waste management system using emerging technologies of Industry 4.0 in the City of Johannesburg, South Africa. [Master's dissertation]. [Johannesburg]: University of Johannesburg.

DOI: 10.2307/3109948

National Planning Commission. (2012). National Development Plan 2030: Our Future – Make it Work. Pretoria: The Presidency

DOI: 10.4135/9781446282236.n11

DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927

DOI: 10.1002/ncr.4100820305

DOI: 10.1080/14719030601022882

Pestoff, V., & Brandsen, T. (2010). Public governance and the third sector: opportunities for co-production and innovation? Paper presented at the Conference of the European Group of Public Administration, St Julians, Malta. Available at https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=cec6865a36c73ab5210e38f39b401c2192efaf51. [Accessed November 10, 2023]. [Accessed October 16, 2023].

DOI: 10.1080/09692290420001672881

DOI: 10.1108/13673270610670830

DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2019.1618727

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00780.x

Saloojee, A. (2005). Social inclusion, anti-racism and democratic citizenship. Joint Centre of Excellence for Research on Immigration and Settlement. Available at: https://mail.laidlawfdn.org/assets/wpsosi_2003_jan_social-inclusion-anti-racism.pdf. [Accessed August 16, 2023].

Sanoff, H. (1999). Community participation methods in design and planning: John Wiley & Sons.

DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2019.1575115

DOI: 10.1177/14730952221076601

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00963.x

DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.03.018

DOI: 10.1145/3411764.3445180

DOI: 10.1177/2399654417701730

DOI: 10.1111/puar.13571

DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2022.2033053

DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102892

DOI: 10.3390/su12135427

Vanleene, D., Verschuere, B., & Voets, J. (2015). Benefits and risks of coproduction: A preliminary literature review. Paper presented at the IIAS Workshop on Coproduction.

DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102120

DOI: 10.17061/phrp3222211

DOI: 10.1016/j.cliser.2018.11.001

DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2014.930505

DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100829

DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2013.866266