Can business judgment rule be a justification reason in corruption cases in state-owned enterprises in the form of limited liability companies?
Andi Wahyu Wibisana ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022 · Vol. 11 / Issue 6 · 560-571
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study aims to obtain a scientific, legal construction regarding the position of the business judgment rule in cases of corruption in a State-Owned Enterprise in the form of a Limited Liability Company. This research is normative legal and uses qualitative methods to produce descriptive data. The documents used are secondary data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials published in the public domain. The findings of this study conclude that efforts are needed to harmonize the business judgment rule doctrine with the Indonesian legal system and criminal law. The Government of Indonesia and the Legislative Body to make a derivative of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies or Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT No.40/2007) which regulates more clearly and in detail related to the business judgment rule and its derivatives so that there is a sense of justice and legal certainty and legal protection for stakeholders, law enforcers and directors. Thus, the Directors of State-Owned Enterprise s(SOE) or Badan Usaha Milik Negara Pesero (BUMN) in running the company have accountability rules related to business decisions made to optimize the company's performance achievements, which in turn can have a positive impact on the Indonesian economy.
Keywords: {'name': 'Business Judgment Rule, State-Owned Enterprises, Limited Liability Companies, Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007, Indonesia Legal System'}
Authors & affiliations
Andi Wahyu Wibisana
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
Affandhi, F. (2015). Business Judgment Rule Dikaitkan Dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan oleh Direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara Terhadap Kepitusan Bisnis Yang Diambil. [Thesis]. Program Magister (S2) Ilmu Hukum Pasca Sarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara.https://repositori.usu.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/22246/127005026.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Ali, Z. (2011). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan ketiga, Jakarta:Sinar Grafika.
Anderson, C., and Fisher, S. (2009). Corporations Law. Australia, 3rd ed . Chatswood, N.S.W.: LexisNexis Butterworths.
Antunes, J.E. (1994). Liability of Corporate Groups:Autonomy and Control in Parent-Subsidiary Relationships in US, German and EU Law - An International and Comparative Perspective Deventer , Bostom:Kluwer Law and Taxation Publisher, 1- 470
Astawa, I.G.P. (2008). Dinamika Hukum dan ilmu Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Alumni,
Astuti, D.D. (2020). MA lepaskan Karen Agustiawan dari semua tuntutan hukum. https://jateng.antaranews.com/berita/297150/ma-lepaskan-karen-agustiawan-dari-semua-tuntutan-hukum
Black, H. C. (1999). Black’s Law Dictionary. Sixth edition, Minnessotta, USA:West Publising Co, hlm 81.
Boland, M., and Hofstrand, D. (2021). The Role of the Board of Directors. Department of Economics Iowa State University Extension and Outreach. AG Decision Maker. https://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/wholefarm/html/c5-71.html
Ellis, J. (2022). What is the board’s role regarding strategy? The Corporate Governance Institute. https://www.thecorporategovernanceinstitute.com/insights/guides/ what-is-the-boards-role-regarding-strategy/
Fajar, M. dan Achmad, Y. (2017), Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Cetakan IV, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar
Garner, B.A. (2009), Black’s Law Dictionary. Ninth editionThomson West Group: United State Of America.
Gevurtz, F.A. (1994). The Business Judgment Rule: Meaningless Verbiage or Misguided Notion? McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles. Southern California Law Review, 67, 287- 337. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/303865796.pdf
Gunawan, W. (2012), Seri Hukum Bisnis Perseroan Terbatas. Semarang: Raja Grafindo Persada, hlm.26
DOI: 10.23920/acta.v4i2.553
Harahap, M.Y. (2011). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
DOI: 10.15294/ijals.v4i1.53335
Khairandy, R., dan Malik, C. (2007). Good Corporate Governance. Yogjakarta: Total Media
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata)
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHAP)
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Dagang (KUHD)
Lestari, S.N. (2015). Bisiness Judgment Rule Sebagai Immunity Doctrine Bagi Direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara Di Indonesia. Notarius, 08 (2). 302- 315.
Lamintang, P.A.F. (1987). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung:Penerbit Citra Aditya Bakti,
DOI: 10.23920/jphp.v3i1.552
Moeljatno. (2002). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta:Penerbit Rineka Cipta
Nasution, B. (2019). Diktat Kuliah Hukum Untuk Pembangunan Ekonomi, USU Press, Medan, 2019
DOI: 10.51622/patik.v10i1.217
Pramono, N. (2013). Hukum PT Go Public dan Pasar Modal. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset
Prasetyo, A. (2020). Dua Opsi Bagi Kejaksaan Setelah Putusan Lepas Karen Agustiawan. Hukumonline, 14 Maret 2020. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/dua-opsi-bagi-kejaksaan-setelah-putusan-lepas-karen-agustiawan-lt5e6b9d2d1e6fe?page=all
Purwosutjipto, H.M.N. (2008). Pengertian Pokok Hukum Dagang Indonesia 2, Bentuk-Bentuk Perusahaan. Jakarta: Penerbit Djambatan
Rajagukguk, E. (2001). Butir-Butir Hukum Ekonomi. Jakarta: Lembaga Studi Hukum dan Ekonomi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 73 - 240.
Rammelink, J. (2003). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta:Gramedia
Republik Indonesia (2007). Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas
Republik Indonesia (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Republik Indonesia (2021). Undang Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Republik Indonesia (2004). Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan
Republik Indonesia (2009). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 03/PUU-IV/2006 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2009 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001
Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 45 Tahun 2005 Tentang Pendirian, Pengurusan, Pengawasan, Dan Pembubaran Badan Usaha Milik Negara
Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 23 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 45 Tahun 2005 tentang Pendirian, Pengurusan, Pengawasan, dan Pembubaran Badan Usaha Milik Negara
Resa IS. (2022). Business Judgment Rule Dalam UU Perseroan Terbatas. Doktorhukum.com https://doktorhukum.com/
Sihombing, R., Syahrin, A., Hamdan, M., Siregar, M (2019).Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Direksi PT. Bank Jawa Barat & Banten Atas Pembelian Gedung Kantor Pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI No. 2301K/PID.SUS/2016 Jo. Putusan Tipikor Pada Pengadilan Negeri Bandung No. 147/Pid.SusTPK/2015/PN.Bdg. USU Law Journal, 7 (5), 132-151. http://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id
Soeroso. R. (2011). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Solomon, L.D. et.al. (1994). Corporation Law and Policy Materials and Problems, 3rd Ed., American Casebook Series, St.Paul, Minn:West Publishing Co.,
Saputri, A.M.W. (2015).Penerapan Doktrin Bisiness Judgement Rule Sebagai Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Tindak Pidana Korups Oleh Korporasi (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 154 PK/ Pid. Sus /2012 Dalam Perkara Pengadaan Solenoid Valve dan Thrustor Brake pada PT. PUSRI Palembang). Thesis: Program Magister Ilnu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
Schaffmeister, N., Keizer, D., dan Sutorius, E.P.H. (1995). Hukum Pidana (Editor Penerjemah J.E. Sahetapy). Cetakan ke-1. Yogyakarta: Liberty,
Soekanto, S. (2007). Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia Press
Supranto, J. (2003). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Statistik. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta. 2003
Svanidze, T. (2020). Evaluating Introduction of the Business Judgment Rule in Sweden. Master’s Thesis in Business Law 30 ECTS, 1-99. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1458320/FULLTEXT01.pdf
The Wex Definitions Team (2022). Business Judgment Rule. The Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu/lii/about/about_lii
The Wex Definitions Team (2021). Construction. The Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law School. < https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/construction>
DOI: 10.2478/mmcks-2019-0021
DOI: 10.21460/jrmb.2019.141.316
Wilamarta, M. (2005). Hak Pemegang Saham Minoritas Dalam rangka Good Corporate Governance, Disertasi Doktor, Universitas Indonesia, Fakultas Hukum, Program Pasca Sarjana, Tahun 2005, Jakarta