Regulation of private sector bribery as a crime of corruption
Resmen · Abdul Madjid · Faidzin Sulistyo · Reka Dewantara
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022 · Vol. 11 / Issue 6 · 584-590
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 08:52 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 03:21 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Bribery is a form of corruption, but under Indonesian corruption law, bribery from private actors and other private actors (private to private) is not categorized as a criminal act of corruption. The purpose of this study is to analyze the regulation of bribery as a criminal act of corruption in the future. This research applies normative legal research, using a normative juridical approach, using legal material analysis techniques obtained from the research, examined, to be compiled systematically and presented in descriptive sentences. The results of the study indicate that based on the economic analysis of the law theory approach, it can be seen that Law No. 11 of 1980 has not been able to provide harmony between economic principles and the objectives of the law itself; in economic principle, the existence of Law No. 11 of 1980 1980 does not have the value of efficiency, balance and maximum so that sanctions against perpetrators who commit this crime need to be renewed so that they can get legal benefits with the existence of these corruption legal norms. With the conceptualization of the corruption law, there is a renewal of criminal law related to corruption where there is no longer a difference between private bribery and public actors in the future, thus the accountability carried out by public to private, or private to public actors will be a means to prevent criminal acts of corruption, using the theory of economic analysis of law from Richard Phosner indicates that there are severe sanctions resulting in private-to-private actors prefer not to take bribes, because they are seen as corruption so that there is a fear of loss of profits for themselves both present benefits and future benefits, thus this law becomes the optimal legal norm for preventing private sector corruption.
Keywords: {'name': 'Corruption, Bribery, Private Sector. '}
Authors & affiliations
Resmen
Affiliation not supplied
Abdul Madjid
Affiliation not supplied
Faidzin Sulistyo
Affiliation not supplied
Reka Dewantara
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i6.1340
CNN Indonesia. (2019). Mahfud MD Datangi KPK, Bahas Korupsi Sektor Swasta. Retrieved from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20190227134045-12-373092/mahfud-md-datangi-kpk-bahas-korupsi-sektor-swasta
DOI: 10.20473/jd.v3i2.18211
Hamzah, A. (2012). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia & Perkembangannya. Jakarta, Penerbit PT. Sofmedia.
DOI: 10.22146/jmh.43968
Lamintang, PAF. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti.
Marzuki, P.M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, Penerbit Prenadamedia Group.
Putu, S. (2019). Perspektik Hukum Persiangan Usaha Terhadap Kebijakan Demonopolisasi Badan Usahas Milik Negara Di Indonesia, Simbur Cahaya, 25(1), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/sc.v25i1.320
DOI: 10.30996/dih.v15i2.2549
DOI: 10.18592/taradhi.v5i1.75
DOI: 10.29103/reusam.v3i1.1956