Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research in social science studies

Abstract

This study examines the strengths and limitations of 22 published journal articles by conducting a systematic literature review. The review revealed that the qualitative approach was flexible, offered in-depth and detailed information, allowed the use of multiple data collection methods and minimised the chance of having missing data. The approach was found (i) to integrate human touch, was cost-effective and was indeed the only option in some cases of research problems; (ii) to be prone to researchers’ subjectivity, involves complex data analysis, makes anonymity difficult and has limited scope in its generalizability, and (iii) to make replication of findings challenging, and the findings may be influenced by the researcher’s bias. It is concluded, therefore, that researchers should take necessary precautions when using the approach to ensure that the weaknesses of qualitative research do not bar them from achieving research objectives.

Keywords: {'name': 'qualitative research'}, {'name': 'constructivists'}, {'name': 'positivist paradigm'}, {'name': 'critical paradigm'}, {'name': 'interpretative paradigm'}

Authors & affiliations

Kelvin Mwita
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.4135/9781483381411

DOI: 10.2501/IJMR-2014-013

DOI: 10.1136/eb-2018-102939

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.605191

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102580

DOI: 10.1108/JHASS-12-2019-0089

DOI: 10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z

DOI: 10.1177/1609406920938280

DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czaa064

Daniel, E. (2016).The Usefulness of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Researching Problem-Solving Ability in Science Education Curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 91-100.

DOI: 10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20

DOI: 10.1177/1936724419867111

Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(2), 34-35.

DOI: 10.1177/1936724419846197

DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev334

DOI: 10.1177/1936724419876680

DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00056

DOI: 10.1002/nur.21768

DOI: 10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26

Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology: A Step by Step Guide for Beginners. Third edition. London: SAGE publications LTD.

Mehrad, A. & Zangeneh, M.H.T. (2019). Comparison between Qualitative and Quantitative Research Approaches: Social Sciences. International Journal for Research and Educational Studies, 5(7), 1-7.

DOI: 10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571

DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044

DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.1776

DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i5.1842

DOI: 10.1108/JHASS-01-2021-0016

DOI: 10.1136/eb-2015-102054

DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093

Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Rehman, A. A. & Alharthi, K.A. (2016). An Introduction to Research Paradigms. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 3(8),51-59.

DOI: 10.1177/0974909820120509S

DOI: 10.7748/nr.2018.e1466

DOI: 10.1177/1609406918816766

Thomas, R. (2014). Teaching and Learning Focus Group Facilitation: An Encounter with Experiential Learning in a Graduate Sociology Classroom. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 7(1), 1-15.

Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7