The impact of moral character evaluations on cheating, emotions, and self-evaluation

Abstract

Cheating occasionally occurs in organizations; sometimes, it is not easy to detect. Some organizations, such as schools and companies, may include an assessment of individuals' moral character as part of their assessments. Some people believe that when a person is evaluated as moral, he or she will continue to behave ethically. Conversely, when a person is rated below his or her level, he or she will strive to perform better. This article aims to investigate a person's private response to being assessed by their peers for their moral character. We conducted two experimental studies. Study 1 consisted of two groups. Participants in the high-score group received higher ratings from their peers than themselves, while participants in the low-score group received worse ratings than their own. In the following dice-under-cup game, participants in the high-score group were more likely to cheat than those in the low-score group. Study 2 showed that both groups reported varying satisfaction, happiness, and disappointment. In addition, those in the high-score group were more likely to increase their honesty ratings, while those in the low group did not. Our results suggest that assessments of an individual's moral character may not have desirable outcomes as some people believe.

Keywords: {'name': 'Moral Character, Cheating, Emotions, Self-Evaluations'}

Authors & affiliations

Wing Shing Lee
Affiliation not supplied

Chuang Yuan-Hsien
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423

DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364

DOI: 10.1177/1754073911402380

DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1335

DOI: 10.1177/0146167215572134

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-005-8503-5

DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1997.10473680

DOI: 10.1038/nature13977

DOI: 10.1177/0146167212442394

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1518-9

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-009-0049-5

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9779-z

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01317

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219382

DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.05.007

DOI: 10.1515/9781503620766

DOI: 10.1111/jeea.12014

Fischbacher, U., & Heusi, F. (2008). Lies in disguise. An Experimental Study on Cheating, TWI.

DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2012.714246

Hotten, R. (2015). Volkswagen: The scandal explained. BBC News. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-34324772

DOI: 10.1177/0146167211400208

DOI: 10.1093/mind/XCII.368.499

Kelley, J. (2020). Wells Fargo forced to pay $3 billion for the bank's fake account scandal. Forbes. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2020/02/24/

DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.277

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-018-4083-z

DOI: 10.1111/beer.12175

Lewis, M. (2008). Self-Conscious emotions: embarrassment, pride, shame, and guilt. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions, 742-756. New York: The Guilford Press.

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0931-9

Meyer, P. (2010). Liespotting: Proven techniques to detect deception. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633

DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x

DOI: 10.1037/apl0000254

DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33

DOI: 10.1002/soej.12232

DOI: 10.1002/per.1965

DOI: 10.1111/beer.12210

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.040

DOI: 10.5465/20159591

DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.02.001

DOI: 10.1177/0146167211398138

DOI: 10.1037/apl0000986

DOI: 10.1177/0003122411433762

DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12214

DOI: 10.4324/9780203505984-16

DOI: 10.1002/job.2545

DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12411

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9250-y

Wilcox, R. R. (2005). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1130726