Clarifying the significance of instructional methodologies for environmental education integration
Lettah Sikhosana ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022 · Vol. 11 / Issue 7 · 240-248
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:51 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This paper was aimed at clarifying the significance of instructional methodologies used by senior-phase teachers to integrate environmental education. The researcher’s empirical evidence evoked interest in this paper; the researcher noted that senior-phase teachers would barely integrate environmental education and if they did, they would only rely on an outdoor teaching method. This observation piqued the paper's attention. A qualitative interpretive multiple case study method was used. This paper was conducted in three senior phase schools in the Nkangala district in the Mpumalanga province of South Africa. Three teachers who taught natural science, technology, and life orientation subjects were sampled purposefully. Data were obtained through semi-structured interviews and pre- and post-lesson observations, and a typology approach was used to analyze data. The main research findings were that these teachers had confusion about which instructional methodologies to use when integrating environmental education. Furthermore, this paper revealed that the use of instructional methodologies such as narrative, lecture, project, jigsaw, textbook, and student team accomplishment division methods hampered environmental education integration inadequately. Nonetheless, instructional methodologies such as the interactive method, the outdoor learning method, the question-and-answer method, and the discussion method allowed some of these teachers to integrate environmental education effectively. Therefore, to ensure that there is an education for sustainable development and that teaching and learning are responsive to the Sustainable Development Goals. It is recommended that the curriculum implementers and teachers establish ongoing environmental education programs consistent with South Africa’s Curriculum Assessment Policy Statement to enable adequate integration of environmental education through various instructional methodologies.
Keywords: {'name': 'Environmental Education, Instructional Methodologies, Teaching And Learning, Sustainable Development Goals'}
Authors & affiliations
Lettah Sikhosana
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-2519-8_2
DOI: 10.2478/jtes-2018-0004
Ayotte-Beaudet, J. P., & Berrigan, F. (2022, July 18). Outdoor education has psychological, cognitive and physical health benefits for children. https://theconversation.com/outdoor-education-has-psychological-cognitive-and-physical-health-benefits-for-children-183763
Bahadur, C., & Puch, M. C. (2021, June 17). Education to achieve the SDGs. https://sdg-action.org/education-to-achieve-the-sdgs/
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100206
DOI: 10.3390/su9050854
Department of Basic Education. (2021, September 22). National Curriculum Statement (NCS) Grade R-12. https://www.schoolguide.co.za/guide/schooling-in-south-africa/entry/schooling-in-south-africa/national-curriculum-statement-ncs-grade-r-12.html
Downey, K. (2016). The importance of environmental education in America. https://www.lawstreetmedia.com/issues/education/environmental-education-america
DOI: 10.1007/s10488-014-0596-7
Farroq, U. (2012, April 25). Lecture method of teaching, definition, advantages and disadvantages. http://www.studylecturenotes.com/social-science/education/382-lecture-method-of-teaching-definition-advantages-a-disadvantages-
Franzen, R. (2018). Environmental education in teacher education programs: Incorporation and use of professional guidelines. Journal of Sustainability Education.
Gak, M. D. (2011 n.d.). Textbook: An Important Element in the Teaching process.
DOI: 10.3390/su12187741
DOI: 10.1007/s42330-020-00104-8
Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: a comparative study. Academy of business, engineering and science, Halmstad University, Sweden.
Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in educational settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/108486
DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.1933
DOI: 10.4102/sajce.v2i1.22
DOI: 10.1177/1365480216659733
DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcv139
DOI: 10.1007/BF02655854
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129913
DOI: 10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100059
DOI: 10.21125/iceri.2020.0066
DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.1967
DOI: 10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145
Persaud, C. (2018, n.d.). Instructional strategies: The ultimate guide. https://tophat.com/blog/instructional-strategies/
DOI: 10.1007/s42330-021-00135-9
DOI: 10.21125/iceri.2020.0041
Prabuddh, M. (2018, January n.d.). Environmental Education as a Driver for Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322835204_Environmental_Education_as_a_Driver_for_Sustainable_Development_Goals_Research_Gate
DOI: 10.20853/35-1-4427
Rosenberg, E. (2009). Teacher Education Workbook for Environment and Sustainability Education Rhodes University Environmental Education and Sustainability Unit, Grahamstown. Distributed through Share-Net, Howick.
Rossouw, D., & Nel, D. (2012). Subject didactics. University of South Africa.
Rouse, M. (2018, n.d.). Integration. https://searchcustomerexperience.techtarget.com/definition/integration
Rushton, E., & Dunlop, L. (2022, May 4). Five ways the new sustainability and climate change strategy for schools in England doesn’t match up to what young people actually want. https://theconversation.com/five-ways-the-new-sustainability-and-climate-change-strategy-for-schools-in-england-doesnt-match-up-to-what-young-people-actually-want-181966
DOI: 10.17758/EARES8.EAP1119442
DOI: 10.17478/jegys.750519
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012136
Tshautshau, A. (2013, September 16). Environmental education in SA: Are we doing enough? https://www.news24.com/news24/mynews24/Environmental-Education-in-SA-Are-we-doing-enough-20130916
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2014). Aichi-Nogoya Declaration on education for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5859Aichi-Nagoya_Declaration_EN.pd
United Nations. (2015, September 25-27). United Nations Sustainable Development Summit. https://www.za.undp.org/content/south_africa/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101782
DOI: 10.1080/18146627.2016.1224560
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscr.2014.08.016
Zaini, M., & Ita. (2020). Students’ attitudes toward preservation of the school environment through inquiry-based learning. Eco. Env. & Cons. 26(1), 61-68.
DOI: 10.21125/iceri.2020.0033