Echoes on the teaching of physical science using the topic projectile motion

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to present reflections on the teaching of physical science using the topic of projectile motion as a launch pad. It focused on the teaching model and what the Department of Basic Education expects from teaching physical science subjects. Furthermore, it looked at some of the challenges regarding teaching physical science in general and in particular to the projectile motion topic. It looked at empirical studies in projectile motion to situate the current research interest to articulate gaps in the topic and the subject. It concludes with recommendations and highlights a need to focus on all grades when teaching physical science subjects, particularly projectile motion than only in grade 12 as stipulated by Curriculum Assessment Policy Statement. The team teaching approach amongst curriculum implementers and subject teachers is also accentuated, and further investigations are proposed.

Keywords: {'name': 'Misconceptions, Projectile Motion, Prior Knowledge, Performance, Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)'}

Authors & affiliations

Lettah Sikhosana
Affiliation not supplied

Awelani V. Mudau
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2022.103886

DOI: 10.1016/j.cjph.2018.12.010

DOI: 10.1007/s10763-007-9120-9

DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.08.009

DOI: 10.1080/1468181032000158372

Department of Basic Education. (2022). National diagnostic reports on learner performance. Pretoria, South Africa.

DOI: 10.1080/13803610902899101

DOI: 10.1080/0950069970190905

DOI: 10.1002/tea.10054

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2020.104295

Galus, P. J. (2002). Toying with motion. The Physics Teacher, 69(4), 48-51.

Gauteng Department of Education. (2010). Physical Science subject framework. Johannesburg, South Africa.

DOI: 10.1080/0140528850070201

DOI: 10.1080/0020739X.2012.703333

DOI: 10.1007/s11165-008-9092-y

Hausfather, S. (2001). Where’s the content? The role of content in constructivist teacher education. Educational Horizons, 79(1), 15-19.

DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101632

DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101652

Hlatshwayo, E. S. E. (2006). Alternative conception of high school science students on projectile motion. Unpublished MSc dissertation. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Legotlo, M. W., Maaga, M. P., & Sebego, M. G. (2006). Perceptions of stakeholders on causes of poor performance in Grade 12 in a province in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 22(2), 113-118.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103867

DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47217-1_4

DOI: 10.1119/1.2209243

DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.02305a

DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n8p441

DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.1967

DOI: 10.1007/s10972-012-9291-2

Prescott, A. E. (2004). Student understanding and learning about projectile motion in senior high school. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Macquarie University, Sydney.

Prescott, A. E., & Mitchelmore, M. (2005) Teaching projectile motion to eliminate misconceptions. Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 97-104.

DOI: 10.15700/saje.v33n1a573

DOI: 10.1119/1.15122

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2457-0_8

DOI: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Spaull, N. (2014, January 16). Matric is failing SA’s lost children. Mail and Guardian.

Van der Merwe, J. & Masondo, S. (2014, January 12). Insight: Matric results. City Press.

DOI: 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3

DOI: 10.1119/1.13247