The effect of auditor rotation, fee, tenure and professional skepticism on audit quality
Prabowo Hadi Asmoro ORCID ↗ · Erwin Saraswati · Zaki Baridwan
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022 · Vol. 11 / Issue 8 · 221-231
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:04 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the effect of auditor rotation, audit fees, audit tenure, and professional skepticism on audit quality. The data collection method was carried out on 370 auditors who worked at the big 10 public accounting firms (KAP). The research data was in the form of a Likert scale questionnaire which was collected and analyzed using SPSS for windows ver. 22. The results of this study indicated that each independent variable had a simultaneous effect on audit quality. The auditor rotation variable significantly affected audit quality with an antagonistic relationship direction, so the first hypothesis was accepted. The audit fee variable had no significant effect on audit quality. The audit tenure variable had no significant effect on audit quality. The professional skepticism variable had a significant effect on audit quality. The professional skepticism variable had the highest beta coefficient among other variables, so the professional skepticism variable had the strongest and simultaneous effect on audit quality.
Keywords: {'name': 'Auditor Rotation'}, {'name': 'Audit Fees'}, {'name': 'Audit Tenure'}, {'name': 'Professional Skepticism'}, {'name': 'Audit Quality'}
Authors & affiliations
Prabowo Hadi Asmoro
Affiliation not supplied
Erwin Saraswati
Affiliation not supplied
Zaki Baridwan
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
Agoes, S. 2012. Petunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntan Oleh Akuntan Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
AICPA. 1992. AICPA Professional Standards: U.S. Auditing Standards. United States: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
DOI: 10.23917/reaksi.v3i1.5559
Ardhani, L. 2018. Pengaruh Rotasi auditor dan Audit fee Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Independensi Auditor Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Unpublished Thesis. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya.
Arens, et al. 2011. Auditing Assurance Services in Australia: An Integrated Approach. 8th edition. Pearson Australia, NSW 2086.
Australia Government, AUASB. 2012. Professional Scepticism in an Audit of a Financial Report. Australia: AUASB Buletin.
Choiriyah, R. (2012). Pengaruh Time Budget Pressure dan Pengalaman Kerja Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Kantor Akuntan Publik di Bali. Kajian Pendidikan & Akuntansi Indonesia, 1(3).
DOI: 10.15611/pn.2017.474.03
DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
DOI: 10.24843/EJA.2019.v26.i02.p24
Dianti, S. A. 2016. Pengaruh Rotasi auditor, Audit fee, Audit tenure, Client Importance, dan Auditor Spesialisasi Industri Terhadap Kualitas audit. Publication Manuscript. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah. http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43318/
Financial Report Garuda Indonesia. https://www.garuda-indonesia.com/id/id/investor-relations/financial-report-and-presentations/financial-report/index
Friana, H. 2019. Kasus Lapkeu Garuda: Bukti KAP Taraf Internasional Bisa Kebobolan. https://tirto.id/kasus-lapkeu-garuda-bukti-kap-taraf-internasional-bisa-kebobolan-edi1. 29 Juni 2019.
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.385880
Hamonangan, K. Y. 2019. Pengaruh Ukuran KAP, Auditor Switching, Audit Fee, dan Komite Audit Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Yang Terdaftar Di Medan. Published Thesis. Medan: USU. http://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/26546
DOI: 10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149
IAASB. 2019. Professional skepticism lies at the heart of a quality audit. IAASB: Ps Focus.
Indonesia Government Regulation No. 20 of 2015 about the Practice of Public Accountants
DOI: 10.33830/jom.v11i2.234.2015
DOI: 10.1108/ARA-10-2018-0182
DOI: 10.1108/AJAR-06-2018-0009
DOI: 10.31959/jm.v7i1.89
Pramaswardana & Astika. 2017. Pengaruh Audit tenure, Audit fee, Rotasi auditor, Spesialisasi Auditor, dan Umur Publikasi Pada Kualitas Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 19(1), 168-194. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi/article /view/25333
DOI: 10.17509/jaset.v8i1.4020
Ramdani, R. 2016. Pengaruh Fee Audit, Audit tenure, Rotasi auditor dan Ukuran Perusahaan Klien Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Published Thesis. Jakarta: Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/34386/3/RIFKI %20RAMDANI-FEB.pdf
Rinaldy & Anwar. 2021. Professional Skepticsm, Auditor Competence, and Moral Reasoning on Audit Quality. Point of View Research Accouting and Auditing. 2(3), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.47090/povraa.v2i3.151
Saragih, M. R. 2020. The Effect Of Auditor Professional Skeptisism, Locus Of Control, And Independence On Audit Quality. Call for Paper – 2nd International Seminar on Accounting Society. 203-209. http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/PISA/article/view/8826
DOI: 10.25105/mraai.v18i1.2577
Watkins, et al. 2004. Audit Quality: A Synthesis Of Theory And Empirical Evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23(4), 153-193. https://www.proquest.com/openview/848c22290 cbd79f08e07f1a6a491974d/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=31366
Watts & Zimmerman. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective. American Accounting Association, 65(1), 131-156. https://www.jstor.org/stable/247880
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.074