CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJRBSPUBLICATION RECORD

The effect of auditor rotation, fee, tenure and professional skepticism on audit quality

Prabowo Hadi Asmoro ORCID ↗ · Erwin Saraswati · Zaki Baridwan

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022 · Vol. 11 / Issue 8 · 221-231

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS4

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations5Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC

Mendeley · Readers121Cached provider observation

Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:04 UTC

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the effect of auditor rotation, audit fees, audit tenure, and professional skepticism on audit quality. The data collection method was carried out on 370 auditors who worked at the big 10 public accounting firms (KAP). The research data was in the form of a Likert scale questionnaire which was collected and analyzed using SPSS for windows ver. 22. The results of this study indicated that each independent variable had a simultaneous effect on audit quality. The auditor rotation variable significantly affected audit quality with an antagonistic relationship direction, so the first hypothesis was accepted. The audit fee variable had no significant effect on audit quality. The audit tenure variable had no significant effect on audit quality. The professional skepticism variable had a significant effect on audit quality. The professional skepticism variable had the highest beta coefficient among other variables, so the professional skepticism variable had the strongest and simultaneous effect on audit quality.

Keywords: {'name': 'Auditor Rotation'}, {'name': 'Audit Fees'}, {'name': 'Audit Tenure'}, {'name': 'Professional Skepticism'}, {'name': 'Audit Quality'}

Authors & affiliations

Prabowo Hadi Asmoro
Affiliation not supplied

Erwin Saraswati
Affiliation not supplied

Zaki Baridwan
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Agoes, S. 2012. Petunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntan Oleh Akuntan Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

AICPA. 1992. AICPA Professional Standards: U.S. Auditing Standards. United States: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

DOI: 10.23917/reaksi.v3i1.5559

Ardhani, L. 2018. Pengaruh Rotasi auditor dan Audit fee Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Independensi Auditor Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Unpublished Thesis. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya.

Arens, et al. 2011. Auditing Assurance Services in Australia: An Integrated Approach. 8th edition. Pearson Australia, NSW 2086.

Australia Government, AUASB. 2012. Professional Scepticism in an Audit of a Financial Report. Australia: AUASB Buletin.

Choiriyah, R. (2012). Pengaruh Time Budget Pressure dan Pengalaman Kerja Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Kantor Akuntan Publik di Bali. Kajian Pendidikan & Akuntansi Indonesia, 1(3).

DOI: 10.15611/pn.2017.474.03

DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1

DOI: 10.24843/EJA.2019.v26.i02.p24

Dianti, S. A. 2016. Pengaruh Rotasi auditor, Audit fee, Audit tenure, Client Importance, dan Auditor Spesialisasi Industri Terhadap Kualitas audit. Publication Manuscript. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah. http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43318/

Financial Report Garuda Indonesia. https://www.garuda-indonesia.com/id/id/investor-relations/financial-report-and-presentations/financial-report/index

Friana, H. 2019. Kasus Lapkeu Garuda: Bukti KAP Taraf Internasional Bisa Kebobolan. https://tirto.id/kasus-lapkeu-garuda-bukti-kap-taraf-internasional-bisa-kebobolan-edi1. 29 Juni 2019.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.385880

Hamonangan, K. Y. 2019. Pengaruh Ukuran KAP, Auditor Switching, Audit Fee, dan Komite Audit Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Yang Terdaftar Di Medan. Published Thesis. Medan: USU. http://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/26546

DOI: 10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149

IAASB. 2019. Professional skepticism lies at the heart of a quality audit. IAASB: Ps Focus.

Indonesia Government Regulation No. 20 of 2015 about the Practice of Public Accountants

DOI: 10.33830/jom.v11i2.234.2015

DOI: 10.1108/ARA-10-2018-0182

DOI: 10.1108/AJAR-06-2018-0009

DOI: 10.31959/jm.v7i1.89

Pramaswardana & Astika. 2017. Pengaruh Audit tenure, Audit fee, Rotasi auditor, Spesialisasi Auditor, dan Umur Publikasi Pada Kualitas Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 19(1), 168-194. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi/article /view/25333

DOI: 10.17509/jaset.v8i1.4020

Ramdani, R. 2016. Pengaruh Fee Audit, Audit tenure, Rotasi auditor dan Ukuran Perusahaan Klien Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Published Thesis. Jakarta: Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/34386/3/RIFKI %20RAMDANI-FEB.pdf

Rinaldy & Anwar. 2021. Professional Skepticsm, Auditor Competence, and Moral Reasoning on Audit Quality. Point of View Research Accouting and Auditing. 2(3), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.47090/povraa.v2i3.151

Saragih, M. R. 2020. The Effect Of Auditor Professional Skeptisism, Locus Of Control, And Independence On Audit Quality. Call for Paper – 2nd International Seminar on Accounting Society. 203-209. http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/PISA/article/view/8826

DOI: 10.25105/mraai.v18i1.2577

Watkins, et al. 2004. Audit Quality: A Synthesis Of Theory And Empirical Evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23(4), 153-193. https://www.proquest.com/openview/848c22290 cbd79f08e07f1a6a491974d/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=31366

Watts & Zimmerman. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective. American Accounting Association, 65(1), 131-156. https://www.jstor.org/stable/247880

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.074