Organisational informal structures: social identity perspective

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore how the cognitive elements of social identity within informal structures influence employees' perceptions and, in turn, impact corporate strategy. This study proposes a framework for managing such informal structures relevant to both theory and practice by employing a social identity theoretical framework. The research examines the impact of informal structures on corporate strategy within the context of a case study involving a South African mining company. The paper establishes that norms, values, and thought processes toward corporate strategy are informally shaped by social identity groups. It suggests that in future research, employing an alternative theoretical framework could serve to establish the reproducibility of the results. Furthermore, a shift towards quantitative research methods would enhance the comprehensiveness of validity testing through methodological triangulation. The proposed framework offers a comprehensive theoretical perspective that contextualizes the interaction between cognitive components of social identity and corporate strategy. It illustrates how aligning personal goals with corporate objectives, maintaining consistent communication, implementing fair employee recognition practices, and equitably sharing resources can mitigate opposition from social identity groups toward corporate strategy. The research presents a pioneering case study of a mining company that employs social identity theory to delineate the informal structure and ascertain how social identity elements influence corporate strategy.

Keywords: {'name': 'Informal Structure, Social Identity, Organisational structure, Norms, Values'}

Authors & affiliations

Arthur Kadakure
Affiliation not supplied

Michael Twum-Darko
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1094

Adams, C. R., Minton, C. A. B., Hightower, J., Blount, A. J., Adams, C. R., Minton, B., & Blount, J. (2023). A systematic approach to multiple case study design in professional counseling and counselor education. Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 15(2), 1–26. https://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/jcps/vol15/

Adom, D., Hussain, E. K., & Joe, A. A. (2018). Theoretical and Conceptual Framework?: Mandatory Ingredients. International Journal of Scientific Research, 7(1), 93–98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322204158%0ATHEORETICAL

Agogbua, S. N., Anekwe, E. A., & Abugbum, H. (2017). Evolution of management thought: A continuous or discontinuous process. European Journal of Business and Management, 9(35), 67–75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373695830_Thematic_Analysis_in_Qualitative_Research

Akindele, S. T., Afolabi, Y. A., & Pitan, O. O. (2016). The threads of organizational theory?: A phenomenological analysis. Management, 6(5), 158–184. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.mm.20160605.03

Akter Thamrin, I. R. (2021). An Analysis of Bureaucratic Theory by Max Weber. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR) 2021, 1, 374–381. www.ajhssr.com

Albano, R., Masino, G., & Maggi, B. (2010). The relevance of Giddens’ structuration theory for organizational research. 17, 28. http://amsacta.unibo.it/2774/

DOI: 10.1177/1525822X02239569

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00734.x

DOI: 10.5465/amr.1989.4278999

DOI: 10.1002/pchj.176

DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v3-i10/311

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00829.x

DOI: 10.1258/135581902320432732

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.006

DOI: 10.3310/hta15430

DOI: 10.5465/amj.2009.0891

DOI: 10.1177/0261927X211035159

DOI: 10.1017/iop.2018.5

DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.02.015

DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v6i9.em04

DOI: 10.1108/09696471011008260

Denzin, L. (2009). Qualitative Research second edition. Pustaka Belajar, 1–21.

DOI: 10.1037/a0032244

DOI: 10.29173/lirg744

DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195309799.013.0021

DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.003

DOI: 10.3390/su11236769

Gibb, W., Alan, L., & Kathleen, M. (1991). Better Stories , Not Better Constructs , to Generate Better Theory?: A Rejoinder ...

Gibbens, M. (2008). The invisible director: An exploration of the role of power in intergovernmental communication on meaningful municipal integrated development planning.

Giddens, A. (2004). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration: Elements of the theory of structuration. In Practicing History: New Directions in Historical Writing after the Linguistic Turn (pp. 121–142). John Polity Press.

DOI: 10.1177/0258042X18797757

DOI: 10.5929/2014.4.2.9

DOI: 10.1002/9781119678816.iehc0667

Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study. Academy of Business, Engineering and Science Halmstad University, Sweden, 1–15.

DOI: 10.1007/BF02633653

Joya, Q. (2020). Formal and Informal Organizations and their intellectual differences. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multi Disciplinary Field, 6(10), 116–119. https://www.ijirmf.com/wp-content/uploads/IJIRMF202010020.pdf

DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3174

Kort, W., & Gharbi, J. E. (2012). Structuration theory amid negative and positive criticism. 17th Symposium of the Association Information and Management 2012, AIM 2012, 3(5), 92–104. https://ideas.repec.org/a/mir/mirbus/v3y2013i5p92-104.html

DOI: 10.1515/nybj-2015-0003

DOI: 10.3126/hjsa.v5i0.7043

DOI: 10.1177/0894439313492711

DOI: 10.20853/37-2-5083

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-2480-9.ch014

DOI: 10.1201/9781315377452-9

DOI: 10.1177/0146167286123001

DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2023.114076

Negm, H., Taha, D. S., & Saadallah, D. M. (2020). The Effect of the Physical Environment on Social Interaction: The Case of Educational Campuses. Real Corp 2020, 25th International Conference on Urban Development, Regional Planning and Information Society, 8(September), 847–857. https://repository.corp.at/631/

DOI: 10.5296/jpag.v6i1.8886

Noblit, G., & Hare, R. (1983). Meta-Ethnography: Issues in the Synthesis and Replication of Qualitative Research. 67th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

DOI: 10.1007/S40037-017-0349-X

DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78973-973-220191011

DOI: 10.1108/MRR-07-2016-0179

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17674-7_2

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9756-6

DOI: 10.4038/jas.v18i3.10526

Sarkwa, J., & Hons, B. (2011). Informal Relations and Its Effects on Industrial Organizations (a Study of the Coca-Cola Bottling Company and Ghana Breweries Limited).

DOI: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

DOI: 10.11114/ijsss.v7i2.3979

DOI: 10.1086/229967

DOI: 10.5840/iabsproc19967101

DOI: 10.5840/iabsproc19967101

DOI: 10.2308/jmar-52064

DOI: 10.11606/issn.2238-2593.organicom.2019.151755

Veenstra, A. F. Van, Melin, U., & Axelsson, K. (2014). Theorectical and Practical Implications from the use of Structuration Theory in Public Sector Information Systems Research. European Conference of Information Systems (ECIS), 1–12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266858482_Theoretical_and_practical_implications_from_the_use_of_structuration_theory_in_public_sector_information_systems_research

Verbrugge, Tom, Van den Broeck, H. (2016). Adaptive Organizations?: The Informal Organization Reinvented. Ghent University. https://libstore.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/002/273/594/RUG01-002273594_2016_0001_AC.pdf

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511777882.008