An empirical analysis of behavioral maintenance for organizational change in Ethiopia through machine learning techniques
Abay Kidane ORCID ↗ · Zhao Xuefeng
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022 · Vol. 11 / Issue 9 · 01-12
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Behavior maintenance for organizational change is the continuous behavior performance following an initial intentional change. This research examines the importance of factors that influence behavioral maintenance for organizational change. This study proposes a research model incorporating self-determination, regular-fit, self-concept, and habit theories to identify potential influencing factors of behavioral maintenance for organizational change in Ethiopia and quantify the importance level of these factors using ML techniques. A survey study was carried out in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, with 310 valid responses. The comparison of five different ML techniques shows that Naive Bayes (GaussianNB) outperforms the other classification model. Naive Bayes (GaussianNB) model-based feature importance analysis shows that perceived competency, perceived enjoyment, and perceived autonomy are the most prominent contributor to behavioral maintenance for organizational change. The results confirmed that the quality of individuals' motivation affects the extent to which individuals will engage in, and persist with, behaviors.
Keywords: {'name': 'Behavioral maintenance'}, {'name': 'organizational change'}, {'name': 'machine learning'}, {'name': 'quantitative study'}, {'name': 'Naive Bayes (GaussianNB)'}
Authors & affiliations
Abay Kidane
Affiliation not supplied
Zhao Xuefeng
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
AlAmeri, B. (2017). The implications of implementing Electronic Human Resource Management in Abu Dhabi. Liverpool John Moors University.
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.034
DOI: 10.1177/0145445502238696
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.032
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.954
DOI: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.4.12
DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2012.656281
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-117
DOI: 10.1037/t73076-000
Dai, Z., & Heckel, R. (2019). Channel Normalization in Convolutional Neural Network avoids Vanishing Gradients. http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.09539
DOI: 10.1089/apc.2005.19.384
DOI: 10.1177/1359105309358115
DOI: 10.1177/18479790211016273
DOI: 10.20491/isarder.2021.1164
Goodman, P.S., & Dean, J.W. (1982). Change In Organizations. Chapter 6. Creating Long-Term Organizational Change.
DOI: 10.1186/s12966-019-0787-4
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
Hasan, N. (2022). Rethinking End-user’s Adoption and Post-adoption Behavior of Mobile Health in a Least Developed Country: Technical Concepts and Mixed-methods.
DOI: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Higgins, E. T. (2008). Regulatory fit. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 356–372). The Guilford Press.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102259
DOI: 10.1108/03090590210422058
DOI: 10.1037/h0079104
Keith, L. K., & Bracken, B. A. (1996). Self-concept instrumentation: A historical and evaluative review. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations (pp. 91–170). John Wiley & Sons.
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2019.104027
Kline, R.B. (2011) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press, New York.
Kotter, J. (1996). John Kotter ’ s Eight Step Change Model. Management Study Guide.
DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2016.1151372
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1219716110
DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.200407.010
DOI: 10.1037/rev0000033
DOI: 10.3390/su11113159
DOI: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01197
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01157
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2018.1433343
DOI: 10.3390/admsci12020060
DOI: 10.1177/1363459308094417
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962150
DOI: 10.1002/widm.1301
DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-07-2014-0129
DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.14.1711
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0545
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1841423
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-015-1021-9
DOI: 10.3390/s18010018
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01946
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)98191-1
DOI: 10.2307/20650284
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2992058
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-016-9453-x