Human-centric technologies in sustainable supply chain management: a systematic review of the evolution from Industry 4.0 to 5.0
Alexander Samuels ORCID ↗
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024 · Vol. 6 / Issue 4 · 285-302
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This paper examines the shift from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0 in relation to sustainable supply chain management (SCM), highlighting the incorporation of human-centric technologies. As industries progress, there is an increasing necessity to integrate technologies that enhance human-machine collaboration, optimise operational efficiency, and foster sustainability. This work aims to do a systematic review of the evolutionary process, emphasising the transformation of supply chain management by these technologies. A systematic review technique, adhering to the PRISMA framework, was utilised to collect and assess pertinent material published between 2010 to 2024. The review encompassed an exhaustive database search, stringent eligibility screening, and thematic analysis via Atlas-ti software to discern main themes and patterns concerning the incorporation of human-centric technology in supply chain management. The results indicate that the change to Industry 5.0 entails a substantial movement towards human-automation collaboration, with AI and machine learning as essential components. Digital transformation is redefining supply chain management by utilising big data, the Internet of Things, and blockchain technology to enhance transparency, traceability, and decision-making. Bionic supply chains, integrating human intelligence with machine efficiency, are developing as a vital foundation for operational resilience and sustainability. The study suggests that the incorporation of human-centric technology in supply chain management enhances efficiency and sustainability while fostering a more resilient supply network adept at reacting to interruptions. This paper offers essential recommendations for academics and practitioners seeking to enhance supply chain operations in the context of Industry 5.0.
Authors & affiliations
Alexander Samuels
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1108/EBR-03-2016-0045
DOI: 10.1002/ente.201600747
DOI: 10.52547/ijimes.2.2.28
DOI: 10.3390/foods10030543
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2404
DOI: 10.1002/sd.2699
DOI: 10.31803/tg-20210730170447
DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-0225-5
DOI: 10.2478/orga-2022-0020
DOI: 10.3390/su13137004
DOI: 10.1177/1094670509338619
DOI: 10.1108/JKM-09-2021-0718
DOI: 10.3390/logistics7040097
DOI: 10.1017/pds.2024.27
DOI: 10.1108/01409171111178774
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102067
DOI: 10.1108/TECHS-11-2023-0049
DOI: 10.1111/jbl.12267
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3878218/v1
DOI: 10.3390/app121910003
DOI: 10.4468/2022.2.13fortuna.paesano
DOI: 10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n2.a2
DOI: 10.1177/10384162241231118
DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2017.4180835
DOI: 10.1155/2018/4283634
DOI: 10.56397/IST.2023.05.01
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.598
DOI: 10.24251/HICSS.2022.572
DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-0082-4
DOI: 10.1108/IJIS-11-2021-0204
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.106004
DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2020.1810757
DOI: 10.4236/jsea.2010.34045
DOI: 10.1108/13598541211227144
DOI: 10.1002/bse.3029
DOI: 10.1108/IJBM-06-2018-0142
DOI: 10.1177/18479790231200614
DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103187
DOI: 10.1155/2022/9607755
DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.012
DOI: 10.3390/su8100960
DOI: 10.1177/21582440231153037
DOI: 10.1002/csr.2374
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-57993-7_33
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3940924/v1
DOI: 10.1108/SCM-08-2014-0267
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2015.05.003
DOI: 10.4324/9781003393382
DOI: 10.1108/IJPDLM-12-2020-0434
DOI: 10.3390/encyclopedia3030080
DOI: 10.1108/MEQ-11-2020-0277
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1063/1/012039
DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-12-2020-0493
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-22032-6
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1296/1/012001
DOI: 10.1109/TEMSCON.2019.8813713
DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3133104
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.107995
DOI: 10.1149/10701.2315ecst
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
DOI: 10.3390/su13041726
DOI: 10.1108/MSCRA-08-2020-024
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1102454
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4286347/v1
DOI: 10.1111/jbl.12364
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g7647
DOI: 10.2478/emj-2022-0029
DOI: 10.1108/JEIM-09-2022-0326
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.009
DOI: 10.1186/s42467-021-00010-1
DOI: 10.30844/WAGB_2022_11
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.895482
DOI: 10.3390/logistics3010010
DOI: 10.1002/sd.2048
DOI: 10.1080/17521440.2020.1760454
DOI: 10.3846/tede.2022.17120
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2015.12.017
DOI: 10.1155/2022/1823762
DOI: 10.1155/2014/624839
DOI: 10.1115/DETC2022-89711
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-022-02027-7
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2719-9
DOI: 10.31127/tuje.1094375
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03277
DOI: 10.30844/wi_2020_d1-zeiringer
DOI: 10.1108/SCM-03-2023-0131