CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJRBSPUBLICATION RECORD

Analysing coping strategies of students for online teaching and learning during the Covid-19 pandemic

Dillo Justin Ramoshaba · Mathibedi Frank Kgarose ORCID ↗

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022 · Vol. 11 / Issue 9 · 343-347

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS4

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations5Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC

Mendeley · Readers15Cached provider observation

Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:44 UTC

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic led to an increase in the adoption of online teaching and learning. Several studies show that both students and lecturers benefit from online teaching and learning in cases where contact learning cannot take place. However, other studies reveal that some students face challenges during online teaching and learning, requiring them to develop coping mechanisms. Thus, the objective of this study was aimed at accentuating the coping strategies of students for online teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. A non-empirical research design was adopted for this study. Search engines such as ‘Google scholar were used to sample and review documents using keywords to source relevant data that is from 2002 to 2022. Data were analysed using inductive Thematic Content Analysis (TCA). The study's findings show that access to online teaching and learning is challenging for some students. It was also revealed that some students cope with the challenges of online learning and teaching by employing positive strategies such as seeking support while some students employ harmful coping mechanisms such as using drugs and alcohol to cope with the challenges they face during online teaching and learning. The underlined conclusion suggests that online teaching and learning should be accessible and support systems for students should be available. Mobilisation of resources that will help all students to participate in online teaching and learning is needed.

Keywords: {'name': 'Coronavirus, COVID-19, access, education, online teaching and learning, coping strategies, students'}

Authors & affiliations

Dillo Justin Ramoshaba
Affiliation not supplied

Mathibedi Frank Kgarose
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12552

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Grade Level: Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. Babson College, 231 Forest Street, Babson Park, MA 02457.

DOI: 10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.01

DOI: 10.35497/309162

Bakia, M., Shear, L., Toyama, Y. and Lasseter, A. (2012). Understanding the Implications of Online Learning for Educational Productivity. Office of Educational Technology, US Department of Education.

DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x

DOI: 10.1177/1609406916659292

DOI: 10.21432/cjlt27835

DOI: 10.1108/AEDS-05-2020-0097

Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage

DOI: 10.1177/0047239520934018

DOI: 10.1017/ipm.2014.83

DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1971.tb01111.x

DOI: 10.5204/jld.v9i3.293

Gore F, Bloem PJN, Patton G.C, Ferguson J, & Joseph V., (2014). Global burden of disease in young people aged 10–24 years: a systematic analysis. New York: Routledge.

DOI: 10.1080/01972240290075039

DOI: 10.11114/jets.v3i5.947

DOI: 10.4324/9780203016459

DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2013.770404

DOI: 10.1049/ic.2012.0031

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2012.38195

Maluleke, W. 2020. The African scare of fall armyworm: Are South African farmers’ immune? The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 12(1), 207-221.

Masten, A. S. (2015). Ordinary magic: Resilience in development. New York: Guilford Publications.

Matthews, B & Ross, L. (2010). Research methods: A practical guide for the social sciences. Essex: Pearso

Meyer, K. A., & Wilson, J. L. (2011). The role of online learning in the emergency plans of flagship institutions. Online journal of distance learning administration, 14(1).

Mokwena, R.J & Maluleke, W. (2020). SouthAfrican rural communities and the land restitution process: The application of criminological and legal theories in identifying obstacles to rightful allocations of land. Gender and Behaviour Journal, 18(3): 16145-16156

Munezero, M., Irura, M., Kirongo, B., Etiegni, L., & Suhonen, J. (2016). Challenges and solutions to providing online courses in Kenya: a lecturer’s perspective at a Kenyan university. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 4(1), 1.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101

DOI: 10.1177/1948550610386388

O’Reilly, M & Kiyimba, N. (2015).Advanced qualitative research: A guide to using theory. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S272205

Patel, L. (2015). Social welfare and social development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-0115-3.ch001

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.8966

Rajesh, M. (2003). A Study of the problems associated with ICT adaptability in Developing Countries in the context of Distance Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 4(2).

DOI: 10.29252/ijree.4.1.80

Salmon, G. (2002). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. London: Kogan Page Ltd.

DOI: 10.46627/silet.v1i2.38

DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082

Sukmadinata, N. (2003). Pengembangan Kurikulum: Teori dan Praktek, Bandung.

Tamrat, W., & Teferra, D. (2020). COVID-19 poses a serious threat to higher education. University World News, 9.

DOI: 10.29333/pr/7947

Tóth, Z. (2019). Managing Some Institutional Sociocultural On-screen Reading Challenges of Online Learning. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8, 154.

Van-Breda, A.D. (2001). Resilience theory: A literature review. Pretoria, South Africa: South African Military Health Service.

Walsh, F. (2006). Strengthening family resilience. New York: Guilford Publication