Exploring the drivers towards behavioral support for organizational change: a qualitative investigation
Abay Kidane ORCID ↗ · Zhao Xuefeng
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2022 · Vol. 11 / Issue 9 · 118-130
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:35 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Research has indicated that problems related to behavioral support for organizational change must be re-addressed to provide an improved implementation of changes. It is essential to explore factors for the complex implications of organizational change before implementing it in practice. This research aims to explore predictors of behavioral support for organizational change in Ethiopian commercial banks. In-depth interviews with purposive and convenient sampling techniques were conducted with employees (n=43) because qualitative research provides opportunities to explore employee experiences and get detailed information about how they perceive behavioral support for organizational change. This study used grounded theory and thematic analysis to explain behavioral support for organizational change and to establish a theoretical basis for further investigations. Our findings indicate that traditional predictors for behavioral support for organizational change might not be enough. This study suggested three new predictors: "perceived cost," "reward," and "prior change experience" to explore behavioral support for organizational change. The study tried to clarify organizational change drivers from employees' perspectives, which offered an alternative avenue that could provide the foundation for accepting organizational change.
Keywords: {'name': 'Organizational change'}, {'name': 'behavioral support'}, {'name': 'drivers'}, {'name': 'qualitative study'}, {'name': 'commercial banks'}
Authors & affiliations
Abay Kidane
Affiliation not supplied
Zhao Xuefeng
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1017/jmo.2020.41
DOI: 10.1177/0091026017753645
DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
DOI: 10.1037/rev0000155
DOI: 10.1177/0021886307303654
DOI: 10.1017/9781108687058
Bandura, A., & National Inst of Mental Health. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Barend, C. (2021). The Latest Change Management Trends. CoLAB.
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2013.809012
Bryman, A. and Bell, E. (2011) Business Research Methods. 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000401
DOI: 10.1177/0021886399354006
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05279903
DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2022.2054695
DOI: 10.1177/01410768211070206
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.474
DOI: 10.1177/0021886306295295
DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2016.07.002
DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-09-2012-0137
DOI: 10.1007/s10257-020-00479-z
DOI: 10.1037/1076-8998.9.1.11
DOI: 10.1177/0149206310364243
DOI: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000102
DOI: 10.1177/1548051809355595
DOI: 10.1375/ajop.2.1.10
DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.1134
DOI: 10.3390/su11113159
DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-09-2016-0176
DOI: 10.1348/096317906X118685
DOI: 10.1177/0018726715602046
DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-01-2021-0027
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00098.x
DOI: 10.1177/0021886310396550
DOI: 10.1515/psych-2018-0022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cya.2016.06.012
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.514
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-017-9803-x
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.0325
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.70
Stobierski, T. (2020). Organizational Change Management: What It Is & Why It’S Important. Harvard Business School Online. https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/organizational-change-management#:~:text=Organizational change refers to the,operate%2C or its internal processes.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631948
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Tushman, M. L., Kahn, A., Porray, M. E., & Binns, A. (2017). Data Can Do for Change Management What It Did for Marketing. Harvard Business Review.
Wagner, M. (2022). Assessing different culture types. Walkme Blog.
Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective Events Theory: A Theoretical Discussion of the Structure, Causes and Consequences of Affective Experiences at Work. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews (pp. 1-74). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.200407.018