CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJRBSPUBLICATION RECORD

Rethinking and reimagining corporate social responsibility as legislation in South Africa using a qualitative document analytics approach

Mokgadi Julia Ngoepe-Ntsoane ORCID ↗

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023 · Vol. 12 / Issue 1 · 01-13

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS2

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations2Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC

Mendeley · Readers15Cached provider observation

Observed 22 Oct 2026 00:53 UTC

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

South African legislation does not obligate companies to fulfill their corporate social responsibilities. Understanding the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on social inclusivity is crucial in ensuring trade-offs between companies and the citizens residing where development takes place. There is a need for a national consensus on a CSR policy framework within a social cohesion and nation-building compact. The inclusion of the legislation for ensuring compliance towards fulfilling the purpose of the country’s sustainable development agenda is fully referred to in the discussion. The unparalleled position requires collective energies with the public to actualize strategies. This chapter underpins the importance of having CSR as a standalone legislation and seeks to contribute to the world of science by leveling the ground with the rhetoric discussion. The document analysis was the backbone for a qualitative research methodology where the related intricacies were revealed. The research will embark on an empirical investigation to publish evidence-based results based on the document analysis and legislative framework. The gap of a lack of legislation in South Africa has been identified notwithstanding the related legislation, which corroborates the direction the country is taking towards CSR. The study contributes to the body of knowledge on sustainable development on the transformation agenda. However, this study is limited in the sense that it did not embark on a largescale data collection from the implementers and the communities for empirical research which could be measured. This shall be employed in future research for evidence-based information and knowledge sharing.

Keywords: {'name': 'Environmental responsibility'}, {'name': 'Economic responsibility'}, {'name': 'Inclusive economy'}, {'name': 'Social inclusion'}, {'name': 'Corporate Social Responsibility'}

Authors & affiliations

Mokgadi Julia Ngoepe-Ntsoane
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y

Atkinson, P.A., and Coffey, A. (2017). Analyzing Documentary Realities, in Qualitative Research, in Theory, Method and Practice, ed. D. Silverman (London, Sage).

DOI: 10.1186/s40991-016-0008-2

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x

Bowen, H. (2020). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman: Why corporate social responsibility is a must for South African businesses. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/5519. [Accessed on 12 April 2022]

DOI: 10.5465/amr.1979.4498296

Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (Act 46 06 0f 2013). https://www.thedti.gov.za/news2014/ act46if2013BEEpdf. [Accessed on April 3, 2022].

DOI: 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

DOI: 10.1177/000765039903800303

DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0002

DOI: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.02.002

DOI: 10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6

Chaffee, E. C. (2017). The origins of corporate social responsibility. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 85, 347-373.

DOI: 10.4135/9781452230153

DOI: 10.1108/S2514-175920180000002003

Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). “Producing a systematic review” in The Sage handbook of organizational research methods, ed. D. A., Buchanan & A., Bryman (Sage Publications Ltd), 671–689.

DTI. Presidency. (2014). Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act 46 of 2013 Cape Town: Available: htps://www.thedti.gov.za/news2014/Act46of2013BEE.pdf [Accessed April 3, 2022].

Esser, I.M., and Dekker, A. (2008). The dynamics of corporate governance in South Africa: broad based black economic empowerment and the enhancement of good corporate governance principles. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 3(3),157-169.

Flores-Araoz, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in South Africa: more than a nice intention. http://www.consultancyafrica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id.... [Accessed March 5, 2022].

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

DOI: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34

Hou S., & Li L. (2014). Reasoning and differences between CSR theory and practice in China, the United States and Europe. Journal of International Business Ethics, 7(1),19-30.

Institute of Directors Southern Africa. (2016). Governance in SA gets major update. http://www.iodsa.co.za/news/315704/Governance-in-SA-gets-major-update.htm [Accessed on January 23, 2022].

Jensen, M.C. (2000). Value Maximisation and the Corporate objective Function, in Breaking the code change, ed. B.M., Beer & N., Nohria, (Harvard Business School Press), 37-57.

Jun, M. (2012). College of business administration, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China Corporate Social Responsibility across Asia: A Review of Four Countries. Physics Procedia, 7(2), 567-562.

Kirby, N. (2014). What’s really right? Corporate social responsibility as a legal obligation in South Africa, Johannesburg. Legal Brief, February.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00226.x

DOI: 10.5465/amr.2001.4011987

DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0013

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26668-8_3

Socio-economic contexts and contemporary issues, in Corporate Social Responsibility in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1, 51-68.

DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2018.1428084

Ngoepe-Ntsoane, M.J. (2019). A Systemic Review of the Socio – economic Status Using Participatory Rapid Appraisal: case Study of Ikageleng Community in North-West Province. Journal of Public Administration, 54(4.1), 822-839.

DOI: 10.1108/09513570210435870

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1954824

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Anti-Bribery Recommendation. https://www.oecd.org/corruption/2021-oecd-anti-bribery-recommendation.htm:text=AbouttheRecommendation,measurestomakethiseffective. [Accessed April 21, 2022).

Ramaphosa, M.C. State of the Nation Address (2022). Parliament. South Africa. www.polity.org.za. [Accessed May 12, 2022].

DOI: 10.4135/9781849208901

Republic of South Africa. (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa [No. 108 of 1996]. Pretoria: Government Printers.

Republic of South Africa. (2005). National Credit Act [No 34 of 2005]. Pretoria: Government Printers.

Republic of South Africa. (2008). Companies Act [No. 71 of 2008]. Pretoria: Government Printers.

Republic of South Africa. (2008). Consumer Protection Act [No 68 of 2008]. Pretoria: Government Printers.

Republic of South Africa. (2013). National Development Plan 2030. Pretoria: Government Printers.

Republic of South Africa. (2013). Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act of 2000. (Act 5 of 2000). Pretoria: Government Printers.

Roussow, G. The Ethics Institute. (2017). The Social and Ethics Handbook: Pretoria.

Shook, E., Lacy, P., Monck, A., & Rademeyer, J. (2021). Shaping the Sustainable Organization. Accenture report in collaboration with World Economic Forum,1-42.

DOI: 10.1002/csr.1332

DOI: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_206

The King IV Report. (2016). Institute of Directors Southern Africa. Corporate Governance in South Africa. http://www.iodsa.co.za/news/315704/Governance-in-SA-gets-major-update.htm. [Accessed April 22, 2022].

United Nations Global Compact. (2020). The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles. [Accessed March 20, 2022].

United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGP). (2011). New York: Geneva United nations HR Publication.

Visser, W. (2006). Revisiting Carroll’s CSR pyramid: An African perspective, in corporate citizenship in developing countries, ed. E.R., Pedersen and M. Huniche. (Copenhagen. Copenhagen Business School Press), 29–56.

Wilson, M. (2003). Corporate Sustainability: What is it and where does it come from? Ivey Business Journal Online. March/April Edition, 1-5.

DOI: 10.2307/259398

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00274.x

DOI: 10.5465/amr.1991.4279616

DOI: 10.5465/amr.1991.4279616

World Bank Group. (20130. India: Corporate Social Responsibility. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2013/08/27/india-corporate-social-responsibility. [Accessed March 23, 2022].