Examining the teaching strategies of high-performing mathematics teachers in solving challenging 3-dimensional (3D) trigonometry

Abstract

 In this article, we discuss teaching strategies that high-performing mathematics teachers use to assist learners in solving challenging 3-dimensional (3D) trigonometry concepts more effectively. High school learners often find 3D trigonometry challenging. For this study, a purposively qualitative research design was chosen. Five mathematics teachers were interviewed, and 381 scripts of the learners were analysed with the mathematical language error, procedural error, conceptual error, and application error (MPCA error) analysis protocol. Results from this study showed that using concrete models to illustrate the dimensions of 3D concepts was helpful for high-performing schoolteachers. The mathematical knowledge and the quality of mathematical instructions used by the teacher to unpack the 3D trigonometry concepts were found to play a pivotal role in the learners’ understanding. The teachers’ in-depth knowledge of error analysis was valuable, while the teachers’ ability to implement blended learning was crucial for learners. When a misconception occurs amongst learners, it should be challenged or contrasted with the correct conception. An understanding of learners’ errors in 3D trigonometry helps teachers minimise learners’ errors.

Authors & affiliations

Joseph Baidoo
Affiliation not supplied

Kakoma Luneta
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1080/0020739X.2010.486451

Anwar, F. (2011). Student’s Feedback based Blended Teaching Approach for Effective Learning. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 2(1), 12.

Ashlock, Robert. B. (2010). Computation, Misconceptions and Error Patterns. Error Patterns in Computation: Using Error Patterns to Help Each Student Learn, 1–17.

Baidoo, J. (2019). Dealing With Grade 10 Learners’ Misconceptions and Errors When Simplifying Algebraic Fractions. In Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS) (Issue 1).

Baidoo, J., Adane, M., & Luneta, K. (2020). Solving algebraic fractions in high schools: an error analysis. Journal of Educational Studies, 19(2), 96-118.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45053-7_4

Bora, A., & Ahmed, S. (2020). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ perceptions on technological modern teaching approaches. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1), 2418–2423.

DOI: 10.4324/9780203882221-2

Cunningham, R. W. H. L. (2023). Creating interactive sociocultural environments for self-regulated learning. Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications, 17.

DOI: 10.2991/icomse-17.2018.34

Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences.

DOI: 10.1080/00207390500271107

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77760-3_2

DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012065

DOI: 10.1145/3512918

DOI: 10.1080/07370000802177235

DOI: 10.1109/TE.2007.914945

DOI: 10.4102/sajce.v4i3.228

DOI: 10.4102/pythagoras.v36i1.261

Luneta, K., & Makonye, P. J. (2010). Learner Errors and Misconceptions in Elementary Analysis: A Case Study of a Grade 12 Class in South Africa. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 3(3).

DOI: 10.1080/16823206.2013.847014

McDonough, A. (2016). Good concrete activity is good mental activity. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom.

Md Sullah, R., Ismail, N. H., & Abdullah, A. H. (2017). A comparison between virtual and physical manipulatives in geometry learning for standard 2 mathematics. In Man in India (Vol. 97, Issue 17, pp. 235–247). Serials Publications.

DOI: 10.23917/jramathedu.v5i2.9920

DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104203

Ngcobo, A. Z., Madonsela, S. P., & Brijlall, D. (2019). The teaching and learning of trigonometry. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 14(2), 72-91.

DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0119

DOI: 10.4324/9781315009650

DOI: 10.2307/748804

DOI: 10.1007/s11858-022-01459-y

DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.20.3.0309

DOI: 10.1080/10288457.2009.10740662

DOI: 10.55529/jlep.31.26.36

DOI: 10.5951/AT.26.3.0009

DOI: 10.4102/pythagoras.v0i68.63

Tachie, S. A., & Ofori-Kusi, D. (2022, April). Analysis of factors that can positively influence the learning of first-year university mathematics through an online social media whatsapp group. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1568-1573). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

DOI: 10.47602/josep.v3i1.28

Torres-Fernández, V., & McAnally-Salas, L. (2010). A blended learning course in a high school in México: Student? perceptions. 9th European Conference on ELearning 2010, ECEL 2010.

van de Walle, J. A. (2004). Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally (Book). In Teaching Children Mathematics.

van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2019). Developing fraction concepts. In Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally.

VanHiele, P. M. (1959). The Child’s Thought and Geometry. In English Translation of Selected Writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M. van Hiele.

DOI: 10.4324/9780429445569