Corporate governance in the cement manufacturing industry of Zambia
Lyness Chipili Tenasi ORCID ↗ · Mubanga Mpundu ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023 · Vol. 12 / Issue 2 · 54-64
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The article examined corporate governance's effects on the performance of cement-producing companies in Zambia. Assessing the performance of one of the manufacturing segments of the manufacturing industry because of the effects of corporate governance was detrimental to findings on why there is limited growth in the industry. The study specifically assessed the effects of board size, board independence, CEO duality, multiple directorships, and board tenure on the company's performance. A deductive approach strategy was used, which focused on four leading cement-producing companies in Zambia: Lafarge, Dangote, Sinoma, and Zambezi Portland. A sample population of 150 participants was targeted. Questionnaires collected primary and secondary data from the company’s audited reports. This study used the principal components analysis, correlation, and regression analysis using SPSS version 27. The study found and concluded a positive correlation and effect between multiple directorships and board independence on the company's performance. CEO duality positively impacted the company's performance, but it was not statistically significant. On the other hand, it was concluded and found that board tenure and board size had a negative effect on the company's performance. This implied that they had a reducing impact on the performance of the companies in the cement manufacturing industry. Cement companies should tailor the size of their boards to meet their unique requirements, even though board size and tenure have a negative and statistically significant effect on performance.
Keywords: {'name': 'Corporate Governance, Company Performance, Board Size, Board Independence, Multiple Directorships, Board Tenure'}
Authors & affiliations
Lyness Chipili Tenasi
Affiliation not supplied
Mubanga Mpundu
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1257/jel.48.1.58
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.387561
DOI: 10.5539/ibr.v6n10p163
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01133.x
Banda, Z., (2019). Corporate Governance Structures: The Performance of Zambian Listed Companies. Thesis, University of The Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Bank of Zambia (2022). Quarterly Survey of Business Opinion and Expectations, 32(3), Lusaka, Zambia, https://www.boz.zm/QSBOEsReport2022Q3.pdf
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00713.x
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhp121
Chikuta S., (2020). Effect of Corporate Governance on the Financial Performance of State-Owned Enterprises in Zambia. Masters Dissertation, The University of Zambia, http://dspace.unza.zm/bitstream/handle/123456789/6647/Main%20Document.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Collier, P.M., (2017). Accounting for managers: Interpreting accounting information for decision-making, 5th Edition, ISBN:978-119-09710-5
DOI: 10.1108/02756660510608486
DOI: 10.1007/s13520-016-0061-7
DOI: 10.1086/260866
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1999.2202133
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhr076
DOI: 10.5585/remark.v13i2.2718
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00594.x
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2003.10196729
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00069-6
DOI: 10.1108/CG-03-2020-0103
DOI: 10.1177/0974686216666456
DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2014.952109
Kothari, C.R., (2003). Research methodology, methods and techniques, Wisha Prakashan, New Delhi. http://pubs.sciepub.com/ajcea/3/1/4/index.html
DOI: 10.5465/256976
Marashdeh, Z.M.S., (2014). The Effect of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance in Jordan. Thesis, University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom. https://clok.uclan.ac.uk/11163/1/Marasdeh%20Zyad%20Final%20e-Thesis%20(Master%20Copy).pdf
Mugenda O.M and Mugenda A.G., (2003). Research Methods, Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. ACT, Nairobi. https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1917785
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00590.x
Ogula D., (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility: Case Study of Community Expectations and the Administrative Systems, Niger Delta. Vol:17, Article 73, 1-27. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ989820.pdf
Saat, N.A.M., Karbhari, Y., Heravi, S., Nassir, A.M., (2011). Effective oversight roles of board of directors–the case of listed firms on Bursa Malaysia. World review of business research 1, 231–245.
Shapiro, D., Tang, Y., Wang, M., Zhang, W., (2013). The effects of corporate governance on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs. European Economic Review 50, 155–183.
World Bank (2022). Annual Report: Helping Countries Adapt to a Changing World, https://www.worldbank.org/en/about/annual-report#:~:text=The%20World%20Bank%20approved%20%244.9,the%20West%20Bank%20and%20Gaza.
DOI: 10.17576/AJAG-2014-5-05
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5
DOI: 10.1108/CG-04-2020-0119