CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJBESPUBLICATION RECORD

Does corporate board gender diversity influence shareholder value?

Douglas Zvinowanda ORCID ↗ · Chengedzai Mafini ORCID ↗ · John Beneke

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024 · Vol. 6 / Issue 4 · 01-19

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS0

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations0Cached provider observation

Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:35 UTC

Mendeley · Readers6Cached provider observation

Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:35 UTC

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of board gender diversity on the shareholder value of South African-listed non-financial companies on the JSE from 2013 to 2022. The study used a quantitative quasi-experimental method to examine the influence of board gender diversity on shareholder value creation measures from a multi-theoretical perspective. The board gender diversity measures include the proportion of women directors on the board, the Blau index for board gender diversity, and dummy variables indicating the presence of one, two, three, or more women directors on the board, as well as skewed board, tilted board, and balanced board. Shareholder value creation is proxied using standardised market value added, market-to-book ratio, and Tobin’s Q. The study utilises fixed effects models based on linear and curvilinear models to test the hypotheses. According to linear models, all board gender diversity measures demonstrate a significant positive, negative, or no effect on shareholder value creation measures, aligning with the multi-theoretical perspective of corporate governance research. However, curvilinear quadratic models suggest that the Blau index for board gender diversity and the proportion of women directors on board positively and negatively affect shareholder value creation, highlighting an inverted U-shaped effect. The results recognise the "too much- of- a -good- thing” effect and a possible optimal(or worse) level of board gender diversity as crucial. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the claim of the ‘‘one size fits all’’ board gender diversity mechanism in creating and maximising shareholder value, often implicitly stated by regulators and advisors, may be misleading.

Keywords: {'name': 'Corporate governance'}, {'name': 'board gender diversity'}, {'name': 'shareholder value creation'}

Authors & affiliations

Douglas Zvinowanda
Affiliation not supplied

Chengedzai Mafini
Affiliation not supplied

John Beneke
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1108/CG-10-2023-0415

DOI: 10.47750/QAS/24.195.17

DOI: 10.17549/gbfr.2024.29.2.71

DOI: 10.3390/jrfm16010028

DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-05-2021-0138

DOI: 10.1002/csr.2469

DOI: 10.1007/s10997-021-09573-x

DOI: 10.3390/jrfm15070306

Baltagi, B. H. (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

DOI: 10.1108/GM-12-2022-0384

DOI: 10.1155/2022/9559342

DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.2089

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-04999-7

DOI: 10.3390/su14106186

DOI: 10.1186/s40991-024-00095-x

Chaudhary, P., & Suri, G. (2024). Gender equality and diversity in leadership roles. Parikalpana: KIIT Journal of Management, 20(1), 234-259. https://doi.org/10.23862/kiit-parikalpana/2024/v20/i1/225104

DOI: 10.3390/jrfm15120550

DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-02-2018-3378

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-023-05328-w

DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.05.009

DOI: 10.1177/0149206320982650

DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-12-2020-0360

DOI: 10.1002/bse.2721

DOI: 10.3390/su152316142

DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2100438

DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2022.2093121

DOI: 10.1108/CG-10-2021-0373

DOI: 10.1108/CG-01-2022-0032

DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2022.101097

DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2364934

DOI: 10.1108/SEF-06-2021-0255

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-022-05168-0

DOI: 10.1108/IJAIM-05-2021-0101

DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-12-2022-0336

DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6

Kanter, R. M. (1977a). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.

DOI: 10.1086/226425

DOI: 10.1108/EMJB-01-2022-0019

DOI: 10.1177/0972262921992152

DOI: 10.1108/GM-04-2022-0131

DOI: 10.1108/MF-02-2023-0126

DOI: 10.1108/CCIJ-01-2023-0010

DOI: 10.1108/CCIJ-09-2023-0128

DOI: 10.1108/JABES-02-2023-0049

DOI: 10.1177/13548166211025335

DOI: 10.1007/s10690-023-09406-x

DOI: 10.1111/beer.12578

DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-05-2019-0231

DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12517

DOI: 10.1111/corg.12568

DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-04-2022-0125

DOI: 10.1108/SAJBS-08-2016-0073

DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-06-2020-0261

DOI: 10.4102/sajems.v27i1.5287

DOI: 10.1002/bse.3426

DOI: 10.1108/JFBM-12-2021-0155

DOI: 10.1108/CG-03-2023-0120

DOI: 10.1108/EDI-04-2020-0092

DOI: 10.1177/09721509221123198

DOI: 10.1108/MRR-07-2019-0317

DOI: 10.1108/PAR-09-2019-0110

Otto, B., & Muller, R. (2023). Gender balance quotas—the key to gender equality. Financial Times, 4, 5. http://www.ibanet.org/Publications/business_law_international.aspx

DOI: 10.1108/MF-05-2022-0242

DOI: 10.1108/IJCHM-06-2021-0719

DOI: 10.1108/GM-10-2021-0304

DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-03-2022-0225

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-05030-9

DOI: 10.1108/SEF-05-2023-0245

DOI: 10.22452/ajba.vol15no2.2

DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-11-2019-0606

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100721

DOI: 10.1108/EDI-07-2022-0172

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04690-3

DOI: 10.1108/RAF-01-2024-0014

DOI: 10.1177/0170840620944560

DOI: 10.1108/SBR-09-2021-0164

DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-05-2021-0264

DOI: 10.1108/IRJMS-03-2022-0037

DOI: 10.1177/10596011231162491

DOI: 10.1002/bsd2.340

DOI: 10.3390/jrfm17010020

DOI: 10.24251/HICSS.2023.836

DOI: 10.1108/JAL-11-2022-0123

DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2236836

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123319

DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-06-2022-0151