Does corporate board gender diversity influence shareholder value?
Douglas Zvinowanda ORCID ↗ · Chengedzai Mafini ORCID ↗ · John Beneke
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024 · Vol. 6 / Issue 4 · 01-19
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:35 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:35 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of board gender diversity on the shareholder value of South African-listed non-financial companies on the JSE from 2013 to 2022. The study used a quantitative quasi-experimental method to examine the influence of board gender diversity on shareholder value creation measures from a multi-theoretical perspective. The board gender diversity measures include the proportion of women directors on the board, the Blau index for board gender diversity, and dummy variables indicating the presence of one, two, three, or more women directors on the board, as well as skewed board, tilted board, and balanced board. Shareholder value creation is proxied using standardised market value added, market-to-book ratio, and Tobin’s Q. The study utilises fixed effects models based on linear and curvilinear models to test the hypotheses. According to linear models, all board gender diversity measures demonstrate a significant positive, negative, or no effect on shareholder value creation measures, aligning with the multi-theoretical perspective of corporate governance research. However, curvilinear quadratic models suggest that the Blau index for board gender diversity and the proportion of women directors on board positively and negatively affect shareholder value creation, highlighting an inverted U-shaped effect. The results recognise the "too much- of- a -good- thing” effect and a possible optimal(or worse) level of board gender diversity as crucial. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the claim of the ‘‘one size fits all’’ board gender diversity mechanism in creating and maximising shareholder value, often implicitly stated by regulators and advisors, may be misleading.
Keywords: {'name': 'Corporate governance'}, {'name': 'board gender diversity'}, {'name': 'shareholder value creation'}
Authors & affiliations
Douglas Zvinowanda
Affiliation not supplied
Chengedzai Mafini
Affiliation not supplied
John Beneke
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1108/CG-10-2023-0415
DOI: 10.47750/QAS/24.195.17
DOI: 10.17549/gbfr.2024.29.2.71
DOI: 10.3390/jrfm16010028
DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-05-2021-0138
DOI: 10.1002/csr.2469
DOI: 10.1007/s10997-021-09573-x
DOI: 10.3390/jrfm15070306
Baltagi, B. H. (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
DOI: 10.1108/GM-12-2022-0384
DOI: 10.1155/2022/9559342
DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.2089
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-04999-7
DOI: 10.3390/su14106186
DOI: 10.1186/s40991-024-00095-x
Chaudhary, P., & Suri, G. (2024). Gender equality and diversity in leadership roles. Parikalpana: KIIT Journal of Management, 20(1), 234-259. https://doi.org/10.23862/kiit-parikalpana/2024/v20/i1/225104
DOI: 10.3390/jrfm15120550
DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-02-2018-3378
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-023-05328-w
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.05.009
DOI: 10.1177/0149206320982650
DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-12-2020-0360
DOI: 10.1002/bse.2721
DOI: 10.3390/su152316142
DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2100438
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2022.2093121
DOI: 10.1108/CG-10-2021-0373
DOI: 10.1108/CG-01-2022-0032
DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2022.101097
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2364934
DOI: 10.1108/SEF-06-2021-0255
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-022-05168-0
DOI: 10.1108/IJAIM-05-2021-0101
DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-12-2022-0336
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6
Kanter, R. M. (1977a). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.
DOI: 10.1086/226425
DOI: 10.1108/EMJB-01-2022-0019
DOI: 10.1177/0972262921992152
DOI: 10.1108/GM-04-2022-0131
DOI: 10.1108/MF-02-2023-0126
DOI: 10.1108/CCIJ-01-2023-0010
DOI: 10.1108/CCIJ-09-2023-0128
DOI: 10.1108/JABES-02-2023-0049
DOI: 10.1177/13548166211025335
DOI: 10.1007/s10690-023-09406-x
DOI: 10.1111/beer.12578
DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-05-2019-0231
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12517
DOI: 10.1111/corg.12568
DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-04-2022-0125
DOI: 10.1108/SAJBS-08-2016-0073
DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-06-2020-0261
DOI: 10.4102/sajems.v27i1.5287
DOI: 10.1002/bse.3426
DOI: 10.1108/JFBM-12-2021-0155
DOI: 10.1108/CG-03-2023-0120
DOI: 10.1108/EDI-04-2020-0092
DOI: 10.1177/09721509221123198
DOI: 10.1108/MRR-07-2019-0317
DOI: 10.1108/PAR-09-2019-0110
Otto, B., & Muller, R. (2023). Gender balance quotas—the key to gender equality. Financial Times, 4, 5. http://www.ibanet.org/Publications/business_law_international.aspx
DOI: 10.1108/MF-05-2022-0242
DOI: 10.1108/IJCHM-06-2021-0719
DOI: 10.1108/GM-10-2021-0304
DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-03-2022-0225
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-05030-9
DOI: 10.1108/SEF-05-2023-0245
DOI: 10.22452/ajba.vol15no2.2
DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-11-2019-0606
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100721
DOI: 10.1108/EDI-07-2022-0172
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04690-3
DOI: 10.1108/RAF-01-2024-0014
DOI: 10.1177/0170840620944560
DOI: 10.1108/SBR-09-2021-0164
DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-05-2021-0264
DOI: 10.1108/IRJMS-03-2022-0037
DOI: 10.1177/10596011231162491
DOI: 10.1002/bsd2.340
DOI: 10.3390/jrfm17010020
DOI: 10.24251/HICSS.2023.836
DOI: 10.1108/JAL-11-2022-0123
DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2236836
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123319
DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-06-2022-0151