CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJRBSPUBLICATION RECORD

The influence of professional skepticism, auditor’s experiences, and competency on fraud detection

Retna Sari · Stefanie Andrian

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023 · Vol. 12 / Issue 3 · 384-390

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS1

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations2Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC

Mendeley · Readers136Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 23:17 UTC

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

This paper aims to determine the effect of professional skepticism, auditor experience and auditor competence on fraud detection. The population of this research is auditors who work at Public Accounting Firms (KAP) in Central and South Jakarta. This paper used purposive sampling technique and obtained 60 questionnaires from auditors as respondents. This paper is using quantitative research and the data are analyzed using Multiple Linear Regression Analysis with significance level of 5% (0.05). The results of this paper showed that professional skepticism and auditor competence had a significant and positive effect on fraud detection. Meanwhile, the experience of the auditor has no effect on fraud detection.

Keywords: {'name': 'Skepticism, Experience, Competence, and Fraud Detection'}

Authors & affiliations

Retna Sari
Affiliation not supplied

Stefanie Andrian
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1108/02686901011054863

Anderson, U. L., Head, M. J., Ramamoorti, S., Riddle, C., Salamasick, M., & Sobel, P. J. (2017). Internal Auditing: Assurance & Advisory Services (4th ed.). Internal Audit Foundation.

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., & Hogan, C. E. (2017). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach (16th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.

DOI: 10.33096/paradoks.v2i1.112

DOI: 10.1515/9781503620766

Hayes, R., Dassen, R., Schilder, A., & Wallage, P. (2005). Principles of Auditing: An Introduction to International Standards on Auditing (2nd ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

DOI: 10.1037/10628-000

DOI: 10.32924/ijbs.v3i2.128

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2013). Standar Profesi Akuntan Publik.

Johnstone, K. M., Gramling, A. A., & Rittenberg, L. E. (2014). Auditing: a risk-based approach to conducting a quality audit (9th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.

DOI: 10.18551/rjoas.2020-11.23

DOI: 10.24912/ja.v25i1.722

DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v4n2p17

Moeller, R. R. (2016). Brink’s Modern Internal Auditing (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

DOI: 10.21002/jaki.2008.05

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior (15th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

DOI: 10.21002/jaki.2018.06

DOI: 10.37481/sjr.v3i3.225

Sihombing, E., Erlina, Rujiman, & Muda, I. (2019). The Effect Of Forensic Accounting, Training, Experience, Work Load And Professional Skeptic On Auditors Ability To Detect Of Fraud. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(6), 474–480. www.ijstr.org

Simanjuntak, S. N. (2015). Pengaruh Independensi, Kompetensi, Skeptisme Profesional dan Profesionalisme Terhadap Kemampuan Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Fraud) pada Auditor di BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa FEKON, 2(2), 1.

Srikandi, Y. I. (2015). The Influence of Auditors Competence and Professional Skepticism on Fraud Detection (Survey at Public Accountant Firm On Bandung Listed In BPK). Jurnal UNIKOM. https:doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2018.06

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Alfabeta.

Suhardi. (2018). The Effect of Experience and Knowledge on Fraud Detection with Intuition as Intervening Variable. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Manajemen STIE Pertiba Pangkalpinang, 1(2), 100–116.

DOI: 10.14414/tiar.v5i1.494

DOI: 10.25105/imar.v18i2.5172