Quantitative analysis of Kaizen philosophy on productivity improvement
Laban Gasper ORCID ↗ · Beny Mwenda
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023 · Vol. 12 / Issue 3 · 557-562
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:37 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Due to rising global competition and major changes in consumer demands, preferences, and tastes, many businesses today use the Japanese management technique known as Kaizen to adjust their production processes to meet these expectations. The sole goal of this study was to improve the overall productivity of medium-scale industries by integrating the kaizen philosophy into the production process. Most learning exercises carried out as part of kaizen initiatives were designed to improve social outcomes regarding employees’ problem-solving skills and attitudes. In particular, Kaizen coordinators are concerned with employees’ understanding of continuous improvement and their communication and problem-solving abilities. The pilot project was carried out in the production lines where vanilla extracts were being produced. The Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle technique was used in this study to improve productivity in the production process. The pitch diagram was used as a supportive tool. The two prominent techniques that mainly contributed to the increase in productivity were the PDCA cycle and the pitch diagram. Kaizen implementation led to a 37% increase in the company's total productivity. To increase productivity even further, water tapping and measurement were merged. As a result, it took just 2 minutes instead of 5 to fill a bottle with 20 liters of water. This study concludes that the Kaizen philosophy and elimination of non-value-adding tasks from the production process improve output.
Keywords: {'name': 'Kaizen Philosophy, Medium-Scale Manufacturing Firms, Productivity'}
Authors & affiliations
Laban Gasper
Affiliation not supplied
Beny Mwenda
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.11114/ijecs.v2i1.4302
DOI: 10.1108/IJQRM-03-2016-0035
DOI: 10.1108/IJQRM-09-2020-0328
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65442-3_2
Dimitrescu, A., Alecusan, A.-M., Babis, C., Niculae, E., & Dascalu, L. (2018). Elimination of Losses Used Lean Manufacturing Techniques And Kaizen Philosophy. 2, 7.
DOI: 10.30656/jsmi.v4i1.2186
DOI: 10.30657/pea.2017.14.05
DOI: 10.33889/IJMEMS.2019.4.2-037
DOI: 10.14743/apem2020.1.351
Moen, R., & Norman, C. (n.d.). Evolution of the PDCA Cycle. 11.
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.735.344
DOI: 10.1177/1609406919862424
DOI: 10.3390/app8112181
DOI: 10.7862/rz.2016.mmr.53
DOI: 10.2478/cqpi-2019-0071
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/160/1/012012
Shrivastava, S., & Jain, H. (2018). Review Paper on “Productivity Improvement using Kaizen—MUDA Elimination.” 9(5), 4.
DOI: 10.1108/20401461111189407
DOI: 10.1108/IJQSS-03-2013-0015
DOI: 10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0109