Random walk and modelling stock return
Samuel Tabot Enow ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023 · Vol. 12 / Issue 3 · 353-360
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 22:05 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The debate on whether stock prices follow a random walk continues, becoming the foundation of modern portfolio theory. Supporters of the random walk theory still believe that modeling stock prices is a wasteful exercise. However, evidence from momentum pricing strategy and price reversals suggests otherwise. This study aimed to empirically explore the random walk theory in five international stock markets before and during the Covid-19 pandemic from June 30, 2017, to June 30, 2019, and January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. A multivariate runs test and a generalised distribution function was applied to investigate the theory. The results revealed no significant difference between the observed S-statistics runs and the expected ones, concluding that it is not common to observe random walks in financial markets consistently. Hence price changes in financial markets are significantly affected not only based on new information and investors’ expectations but also by irrationalities that exist among market participants. These irrationalities can be modeled using a generalised distribution function to produce price patterns.
Keywords: {'name': 'Random walk'}, {'name': 'Multivariate test'}, {'name': 'stock markets'}, {'name': 'returns'}, {'name': 'portfolio theory'}
Authors & affiliations
Samuel Tabot Enow
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.18533/jefs.v3i04.161
DOI: 10.15388/omee.2022.13.79
DOI: 10.3390/jrfm15120607
DOI: 10.2307/2333249
DOI: 10.3389/fams.2019.00007
DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.523
DOI: 10.3390/jrfm13090208
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2019.06.002
DOI: 10.24136/oc.2020.024
DOI: 10.15604/ejef.2021.09.04.003
DOI: 10.15604/ejbm.2022.10.01.002
DOI: 10.15604/ejef.2022.10.02.001
DOI: 10.32602/jafas.2023.006
DOI: 10.21533/pen.v7i1.212
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v21.n5.55
DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00379
Hurly, B. (2022). Positive stock and bond correlation will make portfolios more volatile. Avaliable at:< https://www.investmentmagazine.com.au/2022/12/positive-stock-and-bond-correlation-will-make-portfolios-more-volatile-for-years/> retrieve on 15/03/2023.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.668643
DOI: 10.1111/joes.12385
MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). Event Studies in Economics and Finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13–39.
Malkiel, B. G. (1973). A random walk down Wall Street (12th ed.). WW Norton.
DOI: 10.1093/jjfinec/nbaa033
DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2015.1078734
DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101445
DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2009.tm09047
DOI: 10.15408/etk.v17i2.7102
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-006-9059-3
DOI: 10.1257/089533003321164967
DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2011.37.2.107
DOI: 10.1155/2015/385285
DOI: 10.3390/economies8010020