Mitigating the costs of failure: NSFAS challenges and the need for an undergraduate grade reform in South African universities
Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie ORCID ↗
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024 · Vol. 6 / Issue 4 · 426-431
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This paper examines the financial and psychological impacts of the current grade system in South African universities, particularly on students funded by the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS). The system, designed to enhance the quality of education by ensuring students grasp core concepts before advancing, often extends the duration of study for student. This extension leads to significant financial burdens, including additional tuition fees, accommodation costs, and subsistence expenses. The rigid structure of grading can prevent students from progressing in their programs, as failing a core module often disqualifies them from taking multiple subsequent modules. The literature review highlights international practices and the unique socio-economic context of South Africa. Findings reveal that the system contributes to high dropout rates, increased student debt, and psychological distress. This paper argues for a reform in the grading system, suggesting a cap at 40% pass, instead of 50% pass for progression at undergraduate level, which would alleviate some of these pressures. Discussions focus on the potential benefits of such a reform, including reduced financial strain on NSFAS, improved student retention, and better mental health outcomes. The conclusion reiterates the necessity of policy changes to create a more equitable and sustainable higher education system. By addressing these challenges, South African universities can ensure that more students complete their degrees in a timely manner, benefiting both the students and the broader economy.
Authors & affiliations
Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
British Council. (n.d.). How modules and courses work. Retrieved July 13, 2024, from https://study-uk.britishcouncil.org/plan-studies/choosing-course/modules-courses
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad200
Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET). (2022). Academic policy for programmes and qualifications in higher education. Retrieved July 13, 2024, from https://www.dhet.gov.za/Management%20Support/Academic%20Policy%20for%20Programmes%20and%20Qualifications%20in%20Higher%20Education.pdf
National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS). (n.d.). Bursary scheme. Retrieved July 13, 2024, from https://www.nsfas.org.za/content/bursary-scheme.html
DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i3.3291
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (n.d.). Centre for educational research and innovation (CERI). Retrieved July 13, 2024, from https://www.oecd.org/en/about/programmes/centre-for-educational-research-and-innovation-ceri.html
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-8731-0.ch006
SI-UK. (n.d.). UK university grading system. Retrieved July 13, 2024, from https://www.studyin-uk.com/study-guide/uk-university-grading-system/
SpringerLink. (2020). The international encyclopedia of higher education systems and institutions. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1
DOI: 10.1007/s11162-022-09699-3