Exploring accounting lecturers’ use of feedback as a teaching practice: a case of a South African university
Grate Ndabezihle Moyo ORCID ↗ · Boitumelo Moreeng ORCID ↗ · Moeketsi Mosia ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023 · Vol. 12 / Issue 4 · 461-470
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:34 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
This study examined feedback in South African university first-year accounting classes. Teachers' complex approaches are based on their subject matter and pedagogical competence and their views about learning. Among the many approaches is feedback teaching. Feedback is providing performance-related information during or after class sessions or tasks. Feedback improves teachers and students and restructures knowledge. Accounting education found cognitively determined feedback strategies that promote information retention. Cognitivism underpins this paper. Cognitivism and accounting education share intellectualism, critical thinking, deep learning and information retention, long-term memory, and complicated problem-solving. Accounting feedback improves fundamentals. Cognitivism dominates accounting education. This work used exploratory qualitative research. This study selected three first-year accounting professors from different campuses. Participants' feedback knowledge, practices, and challenges were collected through semi-structured interviews. Participant reactions validated the findings. Thematically evaluated data. The study examined feedback comprehension, implementation techniques, and challenges. Accounting professors use feedback differently, which affects teaching and learning. Participants also listed many challenges to their practice.
Keywords: {'name': 'Feedback, teaching practice, teacher-centered, student-centered'}
Authors & affiliations
Grate Ndabezihle Moyo
Affiliation not supplied
Boitumelo Moreeng
Affiliation not supplied
Moeketsi Mosia
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1007/s43545-021-00086-w
Agélii Genlott, A. (2020). Designing for Transformational Change in School: Digitalizing the Digitized (Doctoral dissertation). Örebro University.
DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-11-2019-0330
Ajayi, V. O. (2017). Primary sources of data and secondary sources of data. Benue State University, 1(1), 1-6.
Al-Bashir, M., Kabir, M., & Rahman, I. (2016). The Value and Effectiveness of Feedback in Improving Students' Learning and Professionalizing Teaching in Higher Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(16), 38-41.
Binu, M. (2020). The role of feedback in classroom instruction. The Journal of ELTIF, 5(4), 7-11.
DOI: 10.3390/math8101780
Botes, W., Moreeng, B., & Mosia, M. (2022). Pre-service teachers' experiences of a lesson study approach as a form of student support. Issues in Educational Research, 32(1), 57-70.
Care, E., Kim, H., Vista, A., & Anderson, K. (2018). Education System Alignment for 21st Century Skills: Focus on Assessment. Center for Universal Education at The Brookings Institution.
Cherry, K. (2020, June 10). How We Use Selective Attention to Filter Information and Focus. Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-selective-attention-2795022#:~:text=Selective%20attention%20is%20the%20process,and%20focus%20on%20what%20matters
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2019.1680466
DOI: 10.20853/34-5-4259
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1966638
DOI: 10.4324/9781003117834
DOI: 10.54300/122.311
DOI: 10.25134/ieflj.v4i1.796
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-019-09977-0
DOI: 10.1002/piq.21143
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-009-9247-4
Essel, R., Owusu-Boateng, W., & Essel, H. B. (2020). Challenges and effects of providing feedback to improve learning in distance education: a case study of Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology-Kumasi–Ghana. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-16.
DOI: 10.21428/8c225f6e.5bcbd385
DOI: 10.1080/02602930903197883
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697045
Ganimian, A. J., Vegas, E., & Hess, F. M. (2022). Realizing the promise: How can education technology improve learning for all? Brookings Institution Press.
Goetz, H. (2016). What Tutoring is and What Tutoring is not. Defining and choosing a good, effective tutor. Chapman University. Retrieved from https://blogs.chapman.edu/scst/2016/02/09/what-tutoring-is-and-what-tutoring-is-not/
DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2018v43n12.3
Hattie, J. (2011). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
DOI: 10.3102/003465430298487
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5085-3.ch017
DOI: 10.21125/edulearn.2018.1840
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
DOI: 10.1177/1049732309350879
Kew, J., & Watson, A. (2014). Improving conceptual understanding through mother tongue intervention. Proceedings of the 2014 SAAA Western Cape Regional Conference, 8 August 2014, 2014, Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.saaa.org.za/Downloads/Publications/SAAAWesternCape
Kir, P. (2020). Exploring the relationship between the beliefs and practices of instructors about oral corrective feedback in EFL classes: A case study from Turkey. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(2), 567-583.
DOI: 10.20853/33-6-2939
DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-00661-w
Lim, S. (2020). Why clarity of purpose is important to success and how to get it. Retrieved from https://stunningmotivation.com/why-clarity-of-purpose-is-important-to-success-and-how-to-get-it/
DOI: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.8
DOI: 10.1183/20734735.001918
Marsh, E. (2019). Why we need to give more positive feedback. Retrieved from https://www.t-three.com/thinking-space/blog/why-we-need-to-give-more-positive-feedback
McLeod, S. A. (2020). Behaviorist approach. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org/behaviorism.html
DOI: 10.1080/09751122.2016.11890464
DOI: 10.1177/1362168815572747
DOI: 10.4102/td.v17i1.873
Padgett, D. (2020). Learning theories: Understanding the 4 major ones for the classroom. Retrieved from https://www.leaderinme.org/blog/learning-theories/
Pearson. (2016). Pearson BTEC Nationals. Business. Retrieved from https://qualifications.pearson.com/en/home.html
Penn State University. (2017). iStudy for success! Online Learning Tutorials Essentials for essential college skills. Retrieved from http://tutorials.istudy.psu.edu/cooperativelearning/cooperativelearning4.html
DOI: 10.1007/s10212-017-0344-y
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1142500
DOI: 10.1353/book4849
DOI: 10.1117/12.2270022
Qhosola, M. R. (2016). Creating Sustainable Learning Environments for a grade 10 Accounting classroom: A Critical Accounting Approach (Doctoral dissertation). University of the Free State.
DOI: 10.18820/2519593X/pie.v35i2.3
Reiser, R. A. (2018). A history of instructional design and technology. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology (4th ed). Pearson Education.
Sambell, K. (2011). Rethinking feedback in higher education: An assessment for learning perspective. Published by ESCalate HEA Subject Centre for Education University of Bristol Graduate School of Education 35 Berkeley Square Bristol, BS8 1JA Email: [email protected] www.escalate.ac.uk © Kay Sambell and ESCalate July 2011. https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/uploads/production/document/path/2/2729/RethinkingFeedbackInHigherEducation.pdf
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.16-07-0219
Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective (8th Ed.). Pearson Education.
Schutte. (2021). Accounting for All. Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd.
DOI: 10.20853/33-3-2224
DOI: 10.1080/08832323.2016.1256264
DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.201014.090
DOI: 10.5296/ijafr.v8i4.13744
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3078559
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3422
DOI: 10.21890/ijres.57796
Syamsuddin, R. (2021). Learning motivation, motivation of learning. In A. Abdul-Gayoum (Ed.), Effective learning and teaching for ESP (pp. 1-32). LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1240815
Thomas, H. (2020). What are learning theories and why are they important for learning design? Retrieved from https://www.mybrainisopen.net/learning-theories-and-learning-design/
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.004
DOI: 10.5430/ijhe.v8n6p157
Victoria State Government. (2020). The Pedagogical Model. Department of Education & Training.
Warde, A. (2004). Practice and Field: Revising Bourdieusian concepts. CRIC Discussion Paper No. 65. Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester.
DOI: 10.1080/15566382.2017.12069189
Williams, C. (2020). Levels of feedback in preparation for a student-led conferencing event: A case study of elementary students' experiences (Doctoral dissertation). University of Kentucky.
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-3344-5_18
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743313