A survey of inspiring swarm intelligence models for the design of a swarm-based ontology for addressing the cyber security problem
Audecious Mugwagwa ORCID ↗ · Colin Chibaya ORCID ↗ · Ernest Bhero ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023 · Vol. 12 / Issue 4 · 483-494
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The increased use of the internet raises concerns about the security of data and other resources shared in cyberspace. Although efforts to improve data security are visible, the need to continuously explore other avenues for preventing and mitigating cyberattacks is apparent. Swarm intelligence models have, in the past, been considered in cybersecurity though there was no formal representation of the swarm intelligence knowledge domain that defines how these models fit into the cybersecurity body of knowledge. This article reviews the aspects of three swarm intelligence models that may inspire the design of the desired swarm intelligence ontology. The algorithms are particle swarm optimization, ant colony optimization, and the artificial bee colony model. In each case, we investigate the main driving features of the model, the causal aspects, and the effects of those causal aspects on the resolution of the cybersecurity problem. We also investigate how these features can be recommended as the building blocks of the desired swarm intelligence ontology. Investigations indicate that the artificial bee colony model has three outstanding aspects considered for the design of the swarm intelligence ontology and that is the quality, popularity, and communication. Foraging through pheromone deposits is an outstanding component of ant colony optimization that aids in locating threats sources more quickly by using the shortest route or tracks with high pheromone deposits. The particle swarm optimization model, on the other hand, adds alignment, cohesion, and collision avoidance aspects to the ontology to augment the ant colony and artificial bee colony algorithms. In our view, although intrusion detection is a complex problem in cybersecurity, the power of integrated swarm intelligence models is more than the sum of the individual capabilities of each swarm intelligence model individually. The article, therefore, proposes a swarm intelligence ontology that will potentially bring us closer to resolving the general cybersecurity problem.
Keywords: {'name': 'Swarm Intelligence'}, {'name': 'Cybersecurity'}, {'name': 'Particle Swarm Optimisation'}, {'name': 'Ant Colony Model'}, {'name': 'Artificial Bee Colony Model'}, {'name': 'Swarm Intelligence Ontology'}
Authors & affiliations
Audecious Mugwagwa
Affiliation not supplied
Colin Chibaya
Affiliation not supplied
Ernest Bhero
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.3390/s22166117
Amal, M., & Venkadesh, P. (2022). Review of Cyber Attack Detection: Honeypot System. Webology.
DOI: 10.1155/2015/574589
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2021.102258
Chhikara, P., & Patel, A. K. (2013). Enhancing Network Security using Ant Colony Optimization. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology.
DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2016.2548426
DOI: 10.1109/SIS.2007.368035
Dar, W. T. (2015). A systematic literature review on Swarm Intelligence. ResearchGate.
Dobson, G., & Sawyer, P. (2006). Revisiting ontology-based requirements engineering in the age of the semantic web. In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Dependable Requirements Engineering of Computerised Systems at NPPs, IFE, Halden, Norway.
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.2002.1010
DOI: 10.3390/e22030362
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2012.01.013
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081
DOI: 10.1007/s11633-016-0950-1
Hudedagaddi, D. (2012). Detection and Prevention of Blackhole Attack in MANET Using ACO. ResearchGate.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcss.2014.02.005
DOI: 10.1109/ICCIC.2016.7919625
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2021.102248
DOI: 10.3390/computers8040088
DOI: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2019.1.001
Mcanyana, W., Brindley, C., & Seedat, Y. (2020). Insight into the cyberthreat landscape in South Africa. Accenture.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93025-1
Mushininga, R. (2014). Nanorobotic Agents Communication Using Bee Inspired Swarm Intelligence. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v9i12.ec04
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-530371/v1
Pupillo, L., Fantin, S., Ferreira, A., & Polito, C. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity: Technology, Governance and Policy Challenges. Centre for European Policy Studies.
Rainie, L., & Anderson, J. (2017). The Internet of Things Connectivity Binge: What Are the Implications? Pew Research Center.
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818287-1.00003-6
DOI: 10.1145/37401.37406
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100762
DOI: 10.20944/preprints201809.0007.v1
DOI: 10.23962/10539/23574
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809362-7.50003-0
DOI: 10.1109/TNSE.2017.2745108
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2015.04.006
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3009533
Wyatt, M. (2021). Responding to the Microsoft Exchange Hack. Wall Street Journal Pro Cybersecurity Research.
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801538-4.00012-4