Evaluating criteria for the implementation of energy management strategies
Erika Van der Westhuizen ORCID ↗
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024 · Vol. 6 / Issue 4 · 349-360
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Strategic management assists organizations in formulating, implementing, and evaluating decisions to set objectives. Energy management should consider top management commitment, risk management, corporate social responsibility, and knowledge and awareness of energy strategies as criteria for implementation. The research aimed to evaluate the four criteria in terms of energy management strategy implementation. A quantitative, non-experimental research design was followed using a structured questionnaire. The most important criterion identified is top management commitment. The results indicate a strong positive correlation between top management commitment and energy management strategies and the importance of risk management. Corporate Social Responsibility and limited knowledge and awareness showed a lower correlation but also contributed to the implementation of energy management strategies. It showed that a lack of knowledge and awareness influences the implementation; organizations can do internal awareness campaigns and appoint a dedicated energy team that can assist management in educating and communicating energy strategies. Further findings included that energy management strategies are essential to the overall business strategy of organizations and that organizations can increase their public reputation by positively contributing to corporate social responsibility and top management commitment. Management needs to lead from the front and provide training, resources and leadership in energy practices. It is recommended that organizations set energy plans, have a dedicated energy team and increase their internal awareness and communication.
Keywords: {'name': 'Energy management'}, {'name': 'Corporate Social Responsibility'}, {'name': 'Organizational culture'}, {'name': 'Risk management'}, {'name': 'Top management commitment'}
Authors & affiliations
Erika Van der Westhuizen
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142956
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.024
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.011
Beckers, F., Chiara, N., Flesch, A., Maly, J., Silva, E., & Stegemann, U. (2013). A risk-management approach to a successful infrastructure project. McKinsey Working Papers on Risk, 52. McKinsey & Company, New York.
Berg, H. (2010). Risk Management: Procedures, methods and experiences. Reliability: Theory & Applications, 5(2(17)), 79–95.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.065
DOI: 10.3390/en5125324
David, F., & David, F. R. (2017). Strategic management: A competitive advantage approach, concepts and cases. Pearson–Prentice Hall.
DOI: 10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60561-X
DECC. (2014). Research to Assess the Barriers and Drivers to Energy Efficiency in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. UK Department of Energy & Climate Change.
Department of Energy. (2016). Draft Post-2015 National Energy Efficiency Strategy. Pretoria.
Energy Star. (2005). Higher Education: An Overview of Energy Use and Energy Efficiency Opportunities. Washington DC. www.energystar.gov
DOI: 10.1108/JFMPC-09-2017-0035
DOI: 10.1108/IJBPA-09-2017-0043
Esty, D. C., & Simmons, P. J. (2011). The Green to Gold Business Playbook: How to Implement Sustainability Practices for Bottom-Line Results in Every Business Function. Wiley.
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.070
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2014.04.006
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1307/6/0/202008
International Organization for Standardization. (2009). ISO31000: Risk Management - Principles and guidelines. SABS Standards Division.
International Organization for Standardization. (2011). ISO50001: Energy management systems - Requirements with guidance for use (1st ed.). SABS Standards Division. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=51297
Michelez, J., Rossi, N., Blasquez, R., Martin, J. M., Mera, E., Christensen, D., Peineke, C., Graf, K., Lyon, D., & Stevens, G. (2011). Risk quantification and risk management in renewable energy projects. Netherlands. http://www.iea-retd.org/files/RISK%20IEA-RETD%20(2011-6).pdf
DOI: 10.3390/en17174390
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v6i1.em05
DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2007.08.002
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.077
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.031
Prindle, W., & De Fontaine, A. (2009). A Survey of Corporate Energy Efficiency Strategies. ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry, 77–89.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01442.x
DOI: 10.1109/IESM.2015.7380190
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.061
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119263
UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). (2014). Kyoto Protocol. Retrieved August 29, 2014, from http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00195-2
DOI: 10.17159/2413-3051/2007/v18i1a3342
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112483