The influence of intensity of TikTok use, utilitarian value, and hedonic value on impulsive buying mediated by urge to buy impulsively
Vitria Zhuanita Rani · Ainur Rofiq · Himmiyatul Amanah Jiwa Juwita
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023 · Vol. 12 / Issue 5 · 86-97
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 23:04 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to find out whether there is a relationship between the intensity of using Tiktok, utilitarian value, hedonic value, and impulse buying. TikTok is a social commerce with a live shopping service that provides convenience in online shopping and allows direct interaction with sellers while browsing social media without switching applications. This study uses the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) theory, dividing the stimulus into internal and external factors. Internal factors include utilitarian value and hedonic value, while external factors are the intensity of use of the TikTok application. Respondents in this study are married women who use Tiktok. This research is causality research with a total sample of 120 respondents. The data collection method uses a questionnaire and is analyzed using SEM-PLS. The findings of this study indicate that the intensity of TikTok use significantly affects impulse purchases. However, utilitarian and hedonic values have no significant effect on impulse purchases. For the mediating effect, the impulse to buy impulsively mediates the relationship between the intensity of TikTok use and the hedonic value of impulse buying. However, it does not mediate the utilitarian value of impulse buying.
Keywords: {'name': 'Intensity of TikTok Use, Utilitarian Value, and Hedonic Value, Impulsive Buying, Urge to Buy Impulsively, TikTok'}
Authors & affiliations
Vitria Zhuanita Rani
Affiliation not supplied
Ainur Rofiq
Affiliation not supplied
Himmiyatul Amanah Jiwa Juwita
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
Abdillah, W., & Hartono, J. (2015). Partial Least Square (PLS) Alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Dalam Penelitian Bisnis. Andi.
Adiwaluyo, I. E. (2022, August). The Rise of Commerce: Quick Commerce & Commerce. Marketeers, 18–20.
DOI: 10.3233/HSM-171768
Alisha, Aprilia.-B. N. S. (2017). Online Buying Decision Process among Gen Y Instagram Users.
DOI: 10.24052/JBRMR/V13IS02/ART-13
Anestia, C. (2022, December 7). Cube Asia 2022: Indonesia Pasar Terbesar “Live Shopping” dan “Group Buying” di Asia Tenggara. https://dailysocial.id/post/cube-asia-social-commerce-indonesia-2022
DOI: 10.1108/SJME-03-2018-007
DOI: 10.1086/209376
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.04.003
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4359(98)90009-4
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2016.06.001
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.204-210.2049
DOI: 10.1108/IJCHM-10-2015-0608
DOI: 10.1108/JIBR-02-2017-0018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102345
DOI: 10.1108/JRIM-05-2016-0054
DOI: 10.47750/QAS/22.184.31
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2008.01266.x
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102251
Kartajaya, H. (2019). Citizen 4.0 (A. Tarigan, Ed.; 6th ed.). PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2020). Marketing 4.0 (A. Tarigan, Ed.; 5th ed.). PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
DOI: 10.1108/XJM-12-2020-0252
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0157
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.033
DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2017.1254458
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.04.012
DOI: 10.1504/IJEMR.2006.010092
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.008
DOI: 10.1080/15332861.2014.944437
DOI: 10.1108/09590550610642792
DOI: 10.1016/j.intmar.2011.08.001
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: a skill-building approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
DOI: 10.22214/ijraset.2018.4529
DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-04-2019-0214