Facilitating factors encouraging girl learners to choose science, technology, engineering, and mathematical subjects and related careers:

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a drive to recruit more women into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers. However, a perceived lack of interest by girl learners in STEM subjects and careers presents a challenge. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the reasons that encourage high school girls to choose STEM subjects and careers. A qualitative design that adopted the case study approach using the interpretivist paradigm was chosen for this study. The data were collected using a focus group with a novel sample of girls taking technical subjects at a technical high school in a rural area. The study identified four facilitating factors that steer girl learners towards choosing STEM subjects and STEM-related careers. These factors were primary school experience, parental influence, prosperity through employment and entrepreneurial opportunities, breaking stereotypes, and being a role model. The insights gained from this study could be beneficial to the government, businesses, social activists, schools, teachers, and other relevant stakeholders in encouraging girl learners to choose STEM-related and related careers.

Keywords: {'name': 'STEM careers'}, {'name': 'technical high school'}, {'name': 'STEM subjects'}, {'name': 'girl learners'}, {'name': 'girls in STEM'}

Authors & affiliations

Zamandlovu Makola
Affiliation not supplied

Ramudunguane Tabane
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1002/sce.21591

African Union. (2013). Agenda 2063. Addis Ababa: AU. https://au.int/agenda2063/goals (Accessed May 16, 2019).

Ainley, J., Kos, J., & Nicholas, M. (2008). Participation in science, mathematics and technology in Australian education. ACER Research Monographs, 4. https://research.acer.edu.au/acer_monographs/4 . (Accessed May 16, 2019).

Antwi, S. K., & Hamza, K. (2015). Qualitative and quantitative research paradigms in business research: A philosophical reflection. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(3), 217–225.

DOI: 10.1002/sce.21146

DOI: 10.1039/C8RP00098K

DOI: 10.30958/aje.7-2-3

Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5(1), 307-337.

DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2011.641131

DOI: 10.1186/s40594-018-0118-3

DOI: 10.1177/1076217518786955

DOI: 10.1037/a0021819

DOI: 10.1007/s11199-011-0015-4

DOI: 10.1177/2378023117697179

Choudhury, S. K. (2014). Challenges of Women in Science: Bangladesh Perspectives. In PowerPoint presentation, “Workshop on Women in Science, Education and Research” of the Indian National Science Academy (INSA) and Association of Academies and Societies of Sciences in Asia (AASSA), Second Summit of South Asian Science Academies, New Delhi, September (Vol. 24). https://www.ias.ac.in/public/Resources/Initiatives/Women_in_Science/Shamima_K_Choudhury.pdf (Accessed March 3, 2019).

DOI: 10.1145/3319445

DOI: 10.1002/berj.3270

DOI: 10.1177/2372732214549471

DOI: 10.4135/9781412984584

Department of Basic Education. (2015). Action Plan to 2019: Towards the Realisation of Schooling 2030. Taking forward South Africa’s National Development Plan 2030. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education. https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/Documents/Publications/Action%20Plan%202019.pdf?ve (Accessed April 18, 2020).

Department of Basic Education. (2019, March 8). Remarks at the media briefing hosted by Minister of Basic Education, Mrs Angie Motshekga on the occasion of the last post-Council Of Education Ministers’ meeting held in Pretoria, 8 March 2019. https://www.education.gov.za/Newsroom/Speeches/tabid/950/ctl/Details/mid/8127/ItemID/60002/Default.aspx [Accessed April 18, 2020].

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.001

DOI: 10.1037/a0018053

DOI: 10.1023/A:1026455906512

DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1721441

DOI: 10.1177/1069072716658324

DOI: 10.1177/0042085913481364

Haller, E. J., & Virkler, S. J. (1993). Another look at rural-non-rural differences in student's educational aspirations. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 9(3), 170-178.

Harris Interactive. (2011). STEM Perceptions Report. http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/presskits/citizenship/docs/STEMPerceptionsReport.pdf (Accessed May 6, 2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.12.009

http://martoniagaskill.weebly.com/undergrad-research.html (Accessed June 12, 2029).

DOI: 10.1080/10130950.2021.1919533

DOI: 10.1002/cd.151

DOI: 10.4102/sajce.v9i1.759

DOI: 10.1177/0095798407310537

Krueger, R. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage publications.

DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36

DOI: 10.1007/s10763-019-10038-9

DOI: 10.1080/09500690902792385

DOI: 10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2

Modi, K., Schoenberg, J., & Salmond, K. (2012). Generation STEM: What girls say about science, technology, engineering, and math. A Report from the Girl Scout Research Institute. New York, NY: Girl Scouts of the USA. https://www.girlscouts.org/content/dam/girlscouts-gsusa/forms-and-documents/about-girl-scouts/research/generation_stem_full_report.pdf (Accessed June 12, 2919).

DOI: 10.1787/02bd2b68-en

DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1433896

Mukhwana, A. M., Abuya, T., Matanda, D., Omumbo, J., & Mabuka, J. (2020). Factors which Contribute to or Inhibit Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics in Africa. Nairobi: African Academy of Sciences. https://www.iavi.org/phocadownload/Factors%20which%20Contribute%20to%20or%20Inhibit%20Women%20in%20STEM%20in%20Africa.pdf (Accessed June 22, 2020)

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-2821-7_16

National Planning Commission. (2011). National Development Plan 2030: Our future, make it work. Pretoria: National Planning Commission. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/ndp-2030-our-future-make-it-workr.pdf (Accessed May 14, 2019).

DOI: 10.1177/0095798406287072

DOI: 10.1007/s13384-019-00357-9

DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1299949

Peterson, A., Gaskill, M., & Cordova, J. (2018, March). Connecting STEM with Social Emotional Learning (SEL) Curriculum in Elementary Education. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1212-1219). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

DOI: 10.1007/s12111-013-9255-4

DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.396

Rabenberg, T. A. (2013). Middle school girls' STEM education: Using teacher influences, parent encouragement, peer influences, and self-efficacy to predict confidence and interest in math and science. (Doctoral dissertation). Des Moines, Iowa: Drake University.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1140384

Saunders, M. N., & Lewis, P. (2018). Doing research in business & management: An essential guide to planning your project (2nd ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson.

DOI: 10.1080/146166900360710

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.002

DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12371

Siddiqa, N. (2019). Barriers to STEM Education for Rural Girls: A Missing Link to Innovation for a Better Bangladesh. Echidna Global Scholars Program, Policy Paper. Center for Universal Education at The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/BrookingsReport1_Nasrin_FINAL_WEB.pdf (Accessed March 12, 2020).

Statistics South Africa. (2016). Education Series Volume III: Educational Enrolment and Achievement, 2016. http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report%2092-01-03/Report%2092-01-032016.pdf (Accessed June 12, 2019).

DOI: 10.4102/sajce.v9i1.759

DOI: 10.1111/1471-6402.00042

DOI: 10.1007/s13384-013-0100-5

DOI: 10.1007/s11199-016-0694-y

Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Buckley, S. (2013). PISA 2012: How Australia measures up: The PISA 2012 assessment of students’ mathematical, scientific and reading literacy. https://research.acer.edu.au/ozpisa/15/ (Accessed July 16, 2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001

DOI: 10.1186/s40594-020-00205-8

DOI: 10.1186/s40594-020-00205-8