The role of South Africa Border Management Authority in tackling border crime: evaluating security networks and evidence-based policing approaches

Abstract

Inadequately secured national and international borders enable the influx of illicit weaponry and ammunition, as well as the transit of illegal immigrants over South African frontiers. Organised criminal factions have executed armed robberies, vehicle theft, hijacking, cash-in-transit heists, as well as human and drug trafficking throughout many places, towns, and cities in South Africa. The enlistment of security agencies and other stakeholders is essential in combating crime.  This study examines the evaluation of the South African Border Management Authority, security networks, and evidence-based policing as comprehensive strategies for addressing border crime and improving safety and security in South Africa. A hybrid methodology was employed for data collecting. The porous borders facilitate the undetected entry of illegal immigrants, and certain security personnel have undermined the system. Evidence-based policing employs scientific evidence for decision-making, grounded in the principle that research should identify areas requiring law enforcement intervention. The Border Management Authority is tasked with the enforcement of South African immigration laws, as well as the protection, control, and management of borders. Recommendations include adopting evidence-based policing and security networks as comprehensive strategies for addressing illegal transnational trade, drug and human trafficking, organised crime, and terrorism; designing and implementing a multi-agency approach; and utilising criminal justice technology and security engineering to improve border security.

Keywords: {'name': 'Approach, Border, Evidence, Holistic, Network, Policing, Security and South Africa.'}

Authors & affiliations

Chiji Longinus Ezeji
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Abel, P. Letlape. (2023). Porous Land Borders and their effect on South African National Security.Stellenbosch: University Press. Avaliable. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/124251

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2451.2009.00699.x

DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2012.686250

Department of Home Affairs. (2015). Border Management Agency. Government Gazette. Pretoria: Government Printer. Avaliable at: https://www.dha.gov.za/files/Strategic_Plan_2015-2020.

DOI: 10.1080/10439460500399791

DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2014.963652

DOI: 10.1080/14719039900000005

DOI: 10.1201/9781315232355

DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1796272

Laws of South Africa. (1977). Criminal Procedure Act, 1977. Act No. 51 of 1977. Government Gazette. Pretoria: Government Printer. Available at: https://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/acts/1977-051.

Laws of South Africa. (2020). The border management authority Act. Act No. 2 of 2020. Government Gazette. Pretoria: Government Printer. Avaliable at: https://www.gov.za/documents/acts/border-management-authority-act-2-2020-

Laws of South Africa. (2020). The border management authority Act. Act no. 2 of 2020. Government Gazette. Pretoria: Government Printer. Avaliable at: https://www.dha.gov.za/files/Strategic_Plan_2015-2020.pdf

DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mul025

DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003498

DOI: 10.20431/2454-9452.0303003

DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024401

DOI: 10.1111/j.1521-9488.2005.00455.x

DOI: 10.4324/9780429500275

Serrano, R. (2018). What makes inter-agency coordination work. Insights from the literature and two case studies. Inter-American Development Bank. Available at: http://www.iadb.org/sds/doc /SOC-InteragencyCoordination-e.pdf.

DOI: 10.1086/670819

South Africa. (2024). Launching of the border management authority. President Cyril Ramaphosa remarks at Musina show grounds. Limpopo: Government Communications. Avaliable at: https://www.gov.za/taxonomy/term/702.