Rethinking the boundaries of public administration: a conceptual exploration

Abstract

This conceptual paper attempts to demonstrate its strength by first accepting that the (p)ublic (a)dministration's loci-foci is within the jurisdiction of the executive branch amongst the two remaining branches of government, namely, the Legislature and the Judiciary. In the executive, the administration of the state is observed. Secondly, this paper argues that while p. a. may be with the executive arm, there is however its place beyond just the said administration of the executive arm. This paper employs the use of public-private partnerships that emanated from the New Public Management Paradigm as well as monitoring and evaluation theory and practice in the public sector to argue its assertion that public administration is being practiced beyond the executive branch. The development programs and projects initiated by the government and handed to the service providers need to be monitored and evaluated to ensure value for money and meet public expectations. As a result, the expectation of quality service from the service provider should be the norm of the day. It is therefore, through the cooperative trajectory between the government and the private sector, that this paper proposes that public administration can be associated with the executive branch but not necessarily limited to the said branch of government. This paper employed desktop research and the existing relevant literature to support its argument and contribution to the discipline of public administration.

Keywords: {'name': 'Public Private Partnerships'}, {'name': 'Public administration'}, {'name': 'Public Sector'}, {'name': 'New Public Management'}

Authors & affiliations

Modupi Selepe
Affiliation not supplied

Arthur Moraka Shopola
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.139

Christensen, T. (2012). Post-NPM and changing public governance. Meiji journal of political science and economics, 1(1), 1-11.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00736.x

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-26896-2_3

Hughes, O.E. (2002). Public management and administration. An introduction. Third edition. New York: MacMillan.

Kalimullah, N.A., Alam, K.M.A & Nour, M.M.A. (2012). New Public Management: Emergence and Principles. Bup Journal.1(1): 1-22.

DOI: 10.31576/smryj.392

DOI: 10.1177/0020852318810883

Louw, V. (2012). From Public Administration to Governance: Science or Ideology? Journal of Public Administration. 47(1): 87-101.

Mamabolo, M.A. (2013). Municipal Service Partnerships: Are they useful in addressing service delivery backlogs? Paper presented at the Conference proceedings of South African Association of Public Administration and Management on the 21st century challenges of local government in South Africa, August 2013 at The Ranch Hotel: Polokwane.

Maserumule, M.H. (2013). Deconstructing The Discourse on The Theory of Public Administration: Prospects for Reconstruction. Journal of Public Administration. 48(3): 477-497.

Molokwane, T. (2019). New Public Management in Botswana Contemporary Issues and Lessons. African Journal of Public Affairs. 11(1): 48-63.

DOI: 10.4102/jtscm.v10i1.197

National Business Initiative. (2019). Water PPP Opportunities in South Africa. Available at https://www.nbi.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/NBI_KYM-Report-4_Water-PPP-Opportunities.pdf [Accessed 05 March 2023].

National Treasury. (2017). Budget Review. Available at https://www.treasury.gov.za/documents/national%20budget/2017/review/annexure%20e.pdf [Accessed 04 March 2023].

Nyagwachi, J.S. (2008). South African Public Private Partnership (PPP) Projects. Doctoral Thesis. Earstern Cape: Neslon Mandela University

Pfiffner, J. P. (2004). Traditional Public Administration versus the New Public Management: Accountability versus Efficiency. In Benz, A. Siedentopf, H. & Sommermann, K. P. (Eds.). Institutionenbildungin Regierung und Verwaltung: Festschrift fur Klaus Konig (pp. 443-454). Berlin: Duncker & Humbolt.

Phago, K.G. & Malan, L.P. (2004). Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) and their Role in Extending Access to Local Governance. Journal of Public Administration. 39 (4.1):481-491.

DOI: 10.1177/0020852318759736

Republic of South Africa (RSA) 1998. The White Paper on Local Government, 1998. Pretoria: Government printers.

Republic of South Africa (RSA) 2000. The Paper on Municipal Service Partnerships of 2000. Pretoria: Government printers.

Republic of South Africa (RSA) 2022. Local government: Municipal Systems Act No. 03 of 2022 (as amended). Pretoria: Government Printers.

Robbins, G. (2008). Municipal Service Partnerships and local government: challenges and opportunities for local economic development. Presented Paper to the annual DDP-KZN Conference on Local Government Financing and Development in South Africa, 11 – 12 August: Durban.

Thornhill, C & Van Dijk, G. (2010). Public Administration Theory: justification for conceptualisation. Journal of Public Administration. 45(si-1): 95-110.

Vignieri, V. (2020). Old Public Administration, New Public Management and Public Governance: shifts in dominant modes of Public Administration. Retrieved at: https://scholar.google.co.za/scholar?q=vignieri+2020+public+administration&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart Accessed: 29 May 2023

DOI: 10.4102/td.v7i2.240

Zia, Y. A., & Khan, M.Z. (2015). A Comparative review of traditional and new public administration and critique of new public management. Dialogue. 9(4): 428-442.