Derivative Misconduct and the Employee’s Duty to Act Bona Fide
Carlos Joel Tchawouo Mbiada ORCID ↗ · Livhuwani Sosanah Lavhengwa ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023 · Vol. 12 / Issue 7 · 664-668
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
In what circumstances may an employer dismiss an employee who deliberately chooses not to disclose information even though she/he was expressly requested to do so? Can a negative inference be drawn against the said employee? These questions are examined within the context of derivative misconduct which emphasises a duty placed upon employees to disclose any misconduct perpetrated by fellow employees. This duty arises out of the implied common law duty of good faith that an employee owes to his/her employer by virtue of the contract of employment. The duty of good faith is a sacrosanct principle of any employment relationship, the breach of which justifies an employee’s dismissal.
Keywords: {'name': 'Derivative misconduct, good faith, trust relationship, doctrine of common purpose'}
Authors & affiliations
Carlos Joel Tchawouo Mbiada
Affiliation not supplied
Livhuwani Sosanah Lavhengwa
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
Bakenrug Meat (Pty) Ltd t/a Joostenberg Meat v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation & Arbitration & others (2022) 43 ILJ 1272 (LAC)
Bassuday, K. (2016) Derivative misconduct and an employee's duty of good faith: Western Platinum Refinery Ltd v Hlebela & others (2015) 36 ILJ 2280 (LAC) Industrial Law Journal 37, 86-91
Chauke & others v Lee Service Centre CC t/a Leeson Motors (1998) 19 ILJ 1441 (LAC)
Council for Scientific & Industrial Research v Fijen 1996 (2) SA 1 (A); (1996) 17 ILJ 18 (A)
Federal Council Retail and Allied Workers v Snip Trading (2007) 7 BLAR 669 (T)
Food & Allied Workers Union on behalf of Kapesi v Premier Foods Ltd t/a Blue Ribbon Salt River (2012) 33 ILJ 1779 (LAC).
Foschini Group v Maidi and Others (2010) 31 ILJ 1787 (LAC)
Grogan, J. (2022) Workplace Law 13th ed Juta
Grogan, J. Derivative misconduct (2004) Employment Law Journal 20, 15
DOI: 10.17159/1727-3781/2016/v19i0a733
National Union of Metalworkers of SA on behalf of Dhuludhlu and 147 others v Marley Pipe System SA (Pty) (2022) 43 ILJ 2269 (CC)
National Union of Metalworkers of SA on behalf of Nganezi & others v Dunlop Mixing & Technical Services (Pty) Ltd & others (Casual Workers Advice Office as Amicus Curiae) (2019) 40 ILJ 1957 (CC)
National Union of Mineworkers & others and RSA Geological Services (A Division of De Beers Consolidated Mines Ltd) (2004) 25 ILJ 410 (ARB)
Ncukana / AF Brands (Pty) Ltd [2022] 7 BALR 737 (CCMA).
Poppesqou, T. (2018) The sounds of silence: The evolution of the concept of derivative misconduct and the role of inferences (2018) 39 Industrial Law Journal 39, 34-49
R v Garnsworthy 1923 WLD 17.
S v Mgedezi [1989] 2 All SA 13 (A)
SA Commercial Catering & Allied Workers Union & others v Makgopela NO & others (2023) 44 ILJ 1229 (LAC)
Sappi Novoboard (Pty) Ltd v Bolleurs (1998) 19 ILJ 784 (LAC)
Sibiya, S. W., Calvino, L. R., & Iyer, D. (2023) Judicial scrutiny of derivative misconduct in South African employment law: A careful approach to the duty to speak obiter 106-121.
Tshabalala v The State; Ntuli v The State 2020 (5) SA 1 (CC)
Western Platinum Refinery Ltd v Hlebela & Others (2015) 36 ILJ 2280 (LAC)