Public cybersecurity awareness good practices on government-led websites
Pranisha Rama ORCID ↗ · Monique Keevy ORCID ↗
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023 · Vol. 12 / Issue 7 · 94-104
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Globally, governments should prioritise and lead cybersecurity awareness as they have a duty to inform their citizens about responsible online behavior. This study aims to search for government-led cybersecurity awareness practices followed by the four world-leading countries (the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK), Saudi Arabia and Estonia) as evident on their websites. This qualitative study employs content analysis by performing a review of the four world-leading countries’ websites, with a specific focus on support materials and other relevant activities as part of cybersecurity awareness. Analysis of the websites found that cybersecurity awareness practices had a wide reach. Firstly, a host of multimedia content (videos, readings, infographics, memes, games, and quizzes) was used in addition to social media platforms. Secondly, the content was categorized for a range of users, with parents and children being favored. Lastly, for countries where the first language was not English, websites were in the official language in addition to English. The study contributes to the literature on cybersecurity awareness. The good practices employed by these countries could serve as a benchmark globally for other countries seeking to formulate or update their websites. Furthermore, showcasing the four world-leading countries serves to assist countries which have a lower Global Cybersecurity Index organizational measure can improve their cybersecurity awareness websites.
Keywords: {'name': 'Cybersecurity Awareness, Cybersecurity Websites, Government, Global Cybersecurity Index, Public'}
Authors & affiliations
Pranisha Rama
Affiliation not supplied
Monique Keevy
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1177/21582440211031879
DOI: 10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120334
DOI: 10.1142/S0219649216500076
DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.B3601.129219
DOI: 10.24425/ijet.2020.131881
Bada, M., Sasse, A. M., & Nurse, J. R. C. (2019). Cyber security awareness campaigns: Why do they fail to change behaviour? arXiv:1901.02672. http://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.02672
Bada, M., von Solms, B., & Agrafiotis, I. (2018). Reviewing national cybersecurity awareness in Africa: An empirical study. The 3rd International Conference on Cyber-Technologies and Cyber-Systems. http://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.40856
DOI: 10.1002/spy2.180
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-50309-3_4
DOI: 10.1093/cybsec/tyab010
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-021-02739-y
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2020.101959
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2011.08.004
DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2022.103614
DOI: 10.4018/ijcwt.2011010103
DOI: 10.1108/ICS-12-2020-0200
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.007
DOI: 10.17705/1CAIS.01631
DOI: 10.1016/S1353-4858(17)30122-8
DOI: 10.3846/cibmee.2021.618
DOI: 10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00590.x
International Telecommunications Union (ITU). (2020). Global cybersecurity index 2020. [Online] https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/str/D-STR-GCI.01-2021-PDF-E.pdf
DOI: 10.1177/1463949120966104
Khalifa, S. K. H., & Al-Kumaim, N. H. S. (2021). A conceptual model for prevention of e-financial crimes in UAE: A review paper. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(6), 1-10.
DOI: 10.2498/cit.1001924
DOI: 10.18489/sacj.v52i0.201
DOI: 10.18489/sacj.v29i2.471
DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2022.2031347
Mashiane, T., Dlamini, Z., & Mahlangu, T. (2019). February. A rollout strategy for cybersecurity awareness campaigns. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ICCWS 2019), Stellenbosch, South Africa, 28 February – 1 March 2019. (pp. 242-250).
DOI: 10.19107/IJISC.2020.02.03
National Cybersecurity Alliance. (2023). Stay Safe Online. [Online]. https://staysafeonline.org/about-us/
National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC). (2023). Cyber Aware. [Online]. https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/cyberaware/home
DOI: 10.54483/sajaar.2021.23.1.4
Ole IT-vaatlik. (2023). Be protected from a cyber attack. [Online]. https://www.itvaatlik.ee/kontrolli/#juhend-pdf
Rama, P., & Keevy. M. (2022). A comparative review of South Africa’s government-led cybersecurity awareness measures to those of world-leading countries. Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research, 24, 117-127.
Reid, R., & Van Niekerk, J. (2014). Towards an education campaign for fostering a societal cyber security culture. Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Human Aspects of Information and Security and Assurance (pp. 174-184).
Republic of Estonia. (2022). Estonia and Japan signed digital cooperation agreement. [Online] https://www.mkm.ee/en/news/estonia-and-japan-signed-digital-cooperation-agreement
Saudi Computer Emergency Response Team. (2023). CERT. [Online]. https://cert.gov.sa
DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47009-8_54
DOI: 10.17148/IJARCCE.2022.11728
DOI: 10.48009/1_iis_2019_186-194
Stemler, S. (2000). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7(17), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34
Stop.Think.Connect. (2023). About Stop.Think.Connect. [Online]. https://www.stopthinkconnect.org/about
DOI: 10.3390/fi13020039
DOI: 10.1177/0095399718789076
DOI: 10.1093/cybsec/tyaa019
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0179
Wongkrachang, S. (2023). Cybersecurity awareness and training programs for racial and sexual minority populations: An examination of effectiveness and best practices. Contemporary Issues in Behavioral and Social Sciences, 7(1), 35-53.
DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2021.1919941
DOI: 10.1145/3427920
Zick, C. J. (2022). US, UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand issue advisory on Russian state-sponsored and criminal cyber threats to critical infrastructure. [Online]. https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/security/1186288/us-uk-australia-canada-and-new-zealand-issue-advisory-on-russian-state-sponsored-and-criminal-cyber-threats-to-critical-infrastructure