Grade 3 teachers’ understanding of the implemented mathematics curriculum content

Abstract

This pragmatic action research explores Grade 3 teachers’ understanding of the implemented mathematics curriculum content. Exploring teachers’ understanding of the mathematics curriculum content is required because understanding of content determines how teachers teach, the resources they use, and how teachers assess. It should be noted that, over time, curriculum reforms take place; and these reforms impact not only on teachers’ knowledge, expertise, or motivation, but also on their understanding. Understanding, as synthesised by the researcher, is a planned, prescribed system of presenting one’s thoughts and expertise regarding a particular subject; in this case, mathematics. In exploring this phenomenon, six Grade 3 teachers from Nkangala District in Mpumalanga were purposefully sampled to be part of this study. Data was generated through two phases of reflective activities, observations, interviews, and a focus-group discussion. To answer the two research questions of this study, the generated data was analysed guided by the natural identity framework themes. Findings revealed that teachers’ understanding of the implemented mathematics curriculum content is mostly informed by a combination of their need to comply with the prescripts of policy and higher authority, common understanding to appease their societal needs, and individual understanding based on their experiences and beliefs. The study drew the conclusion that, for teachers to embrace the three propositions of understanding and  identities, teachers’ natural understanding identity should be promoted. This identity is underpinned by reflective practice and adaptation to what works in their day-to-day practice as teachers.  

Keywords: {'name': 'Understanding; roles, content, assessment, NIF; reflections; critique '}

Authors & affiliations

Charlotte Myriam Moshala Galane
Affiliation not supplied

Simon Bhekumuzi Khoza
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

Adnan, M., Abdullah, M. F. N. L., Puteh, M., Ahmad, C. N. C., & Maat, S. M. (2014). The Learning Environment and Mathematics Achievement of Students of High Performance Schools (HPS). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 2(1), 1-15

DOI: 10.5195/rt.2022.965

Amua-Sekyi, E.T. (2016). Assessment, Student Learning and Classroom Practice: A Review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(21), 1- 6.

DOI: 10.1007/s11423-021-10008-5

Asenahabi, B. M. (2019). Basics of research design: A guide to selecting appropriate research design. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches, 6(5), 76-89.

Bartlett, S., Burton, D. (2007) Introduction to Education Studies. London: Sage Publications.

Berkvens, J., Van den Akker, J. & Brugman, M. (2014). Addressing the quality challenge: Reflections on the post-2015 UNESCO Education Agenda. Netherland Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO).

DOI: 10.1080/01425699995380

Booyse, C., & Du Plessis, E. (2014). Curriculum studies: Development, interpretation, plan and practice. Van Schaik.

DOI: 10.1086/461846

DOI: 10.1080/14794802.2018.1479981

Creswell, J. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd.

DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00062-2

DOI: 10.4324/9781003099390-3

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think, Rev.

DOI: 10.2478/rem-2020-0004

DOI: 10.12973/iji.2016.9213a

Galane, C. M. M. (2016). Subject advisors' reflections of the supervision of Grade 3 mathematics CAPS implementation in Mpumalanga Province (Masters Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal).

Govender, N., & Khoza, S. (2017). Technology in education for teachers. Education studies for initial teacher development. Cape Town: Juta.

Güne?, G., & Baki, A. (2012). Primary School Teachers' Views on 4th Grade Mathematics Curriculum. Education & Science/ Egitim ve Bilim, 37(163), 81- 95

DOI: 10.1080/0969594970040304

Hoadley, U. & Jansen, J. (2013). Curriculum: Organizing knowledge for the classroom. Cape Town: Oxford University Press Southern Africa.

DOI: 10.21125/inted.2017.1455

Kajander, A., Mason, R., Taylor, P., Doolittle, E., Boland, T., Jarvis, D., & Maciejewski, W. (2010). Multiple visions of teachers' understandings of mathematics. For the learning of mathematics, 30(3), 50-56.

DOI: 10.3390/socsci8090255

DOI: 10.13054/mije.13.09.3.2

DOI: 10.20853/29-2-471

DOI: 10.20853/30-5-595

DOI: 10.15700/saje.v36n4a1317

DOI: 10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p247

DOI: 10.1007/s10758-021-09560-z

DOI: 10.3390/educsci11110682

DOI: 10.1007/s10639-019-10084-4

Khoza, S., & Mpungose, C. (2018, July). Use of the Moodle curriculum by lecturers at a South African University. In ICEL 2018 13th international conference on e-Learning (p. 171). Academic Conferences and publishing limited.

DOI: 10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26

Koshy, V. (2005). Action research for improving practice: A practical guide. SAGE.

DOI: 10.1007/s10639-022-11363-3

Mabuza, D. C. (2018). Educators’ reflections of the Swaziland Junior Secondary integrated Consumer Science curriculum: Towards development of a unique content area (Doctoral thesis, University of KwaZulu- Natal).

DOI: 10.20853/34-2-3428

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511615238

DOI: 10.15700/saje.v38n1a1428

DOI: 10.1080/13664530.2014.900107

Mpungose, C. B. (2017). Exploring lecturers’ reflections on the use of Moodle to teach physical science modules at a South African university (Doctoral dissertation).

DOI: 10.4314/sajee.v36i1.7

DOI: 10.1080/18146627.2016.1224573

DOI: 10.1080/09695940701478321

DOI: 10.56059/jl4d.v3i1.125

DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2015.1108900

Ojugo, A. A., Ugboh, E., Onochie, C. C., Eboka, A. O., Yerokun, M. O., & Iyawa, I. J. B. (2013). Effects of Formative Test and Attitudinal Types on Students' Achievement in Mathematics in Nigeria. African Educational Research Journal, 1(2), 113-117.

Pellegrino, J. W. (2017). Teaching, learning and assessing 21st century skills.

DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2016.1154608

DOI: 10.2478/seeur-2020-0009

DOI: 10.18421/TEM93-47

DOI: 10.15503/jecs2021.2.399.411

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods. Business Students 4th edition Pearson Education Limited, England.

DOI: 10.34293/education.v7i4.600

Sithole, N. (2017). Promoting a positive learning environment: School setting investigation. Master of Education with specialization in Curriculum and Instructional Studies. University of South Africa.

Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics teaching, 77(1), 20-26.

Start, H. (2012). An office of Administration for Children and families. Early Childhood learning and knowledge Center (ECLKC).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x

DOI: 10.1007/s13384-022-00565-w

Van den Akker, J., De Boer, W., Folmer, E., Kuiper, W., Letschert, J., Nieveen, N., & Thijs, A. (2009). Curriculum in development. Enschede: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (Slo).

William, D. (1999). Formative assessment in Mathematics - Part 1: Rich questioning Equals: Mathematics and Special Needs, 5 (2), 15- 18.

DOI: 10.1080/09585176.2015.1129981