Transformation of the Satya Adhi Wicaksana Doctrine: A contemporary study of building the integrity of law enforcement officers in the Attorney General's office of the Republic of Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to determine and examine the transformation of the Satya Adhi Wicaksana teachings (Loyalty based on honesty, both towards God Almighty, oneself and family and towards fellow human beings) to build the integrity of Adhyaksa personnel (prosecutors and administrative staff) at the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research with a qualitative descriptive analysis approach and primary and secondary data processing. The findings of this study are that the transformation of the Satya Adhi Wicaksana teachings is a very important guideline for every Adhyaksa personnel and aims to build the integrity of law enforcement officers at the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Then the transformation of the Satya Adhi Wicaksana teachings which are associated with the Pancasila philosophy, is very relevant for higher legal education in Indonesia to produce law graduates who have integrity, competence and professionalism so that they can apply laws and regulations in Indonesia by the principles of the implementation of the state's law enforcement function. Furthermore, the transformation of the Satya Adhi Wicaksana doctrine is expected to foster public trust in prosecutors, increase the consistency and fairness of prosecution actions, and provide a basis for holding prosecutors accountable. Thus, this research is expected to provide a contribution of thought for the government, especially the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the Pancasila philosophy.

Keywords: {'name': "Satya adhi wicaksana, integrity, adhyaksa personnel (prosecutors and administrative staff), attorney general's office of the republic of Indonesia, the 1945 constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, pancasila philosophy"}

Authors & affiliations

Hasbullah Hasbullah
Affiliation not supplied

Reda Manthovani
Affiliation not supplied

R. Narendra Jatna
Affiliation not supplied

Sandi Yudha Prayoga
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-04289-8_13

DOI: 10.1108/JMD-09-2010-0064

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta

Arimuladi, S.U. (2021). Kejaksaan Sebagai Role Model dalam Mewujudkan Prinsip Good Government dan Good Governance. Dipresentasikan dalam Rapat Kerja Teknis (Rakernis) Bidang Pengawasan Kejaksaan RI Tahun 2021 secara virtual dari ruang kerjanya di Gedung Menara Kartika Adhyaksa Kebayoran Baru Jakarta Selatan, Rabu (6/10/2021). https://pji.kejaksaan.go.id/index.php/home/berita/1857 (Accessed October 20, 2018)

DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v37i1.33031

Arsad, R. (2023). Realizing Good Governance in Governance Through Law Enforcement and Democracy. Central European Management Journal, 31 (2), 1249 – 1253. https://doi.org/10.32052/23364890.cemj.31.2.126

Atlantic International University. (2024). The Bedrock of Society: The Importance of Laws, March 11, 2024. https://www.aiu.edu/blog/the-bedrock-of-society-the-importanceof-laws/ (Accessed October 20, 2018)

DOI: 10.1002/joe.22141

Bachtiar. (2018) Metode Penelitian Hukum. Banten: Unpam Press

DOI: 10.5604/20805268.1059486

DOI: 10.1177/22785337211070379

Burhanudin, S.T. (2023). Hingga Juni 2023, Kejagung Sanksi Berat 13 Jaksa Langgar Aturan. dalam Yulida Medistiara – detikNews, 28/06/2023. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6796058/hingga-juni-2023-kejagung-sanksi-berat-13-jaksa-langgar-aturan (Accessed October 21, 2018)

DOI: 10.37385/ijedr.v3i1.254

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-83925-3_3

Cover, A.Y. (2016). Reconstructing the Right Against Excessive Force, Faculty Publications, Case Western Reserve University School of Law, 1773 – 1837. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/1651 (Accessed October 21, 2018)

Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design choosing among five approaches. Second Edition. Sage Publications – California.

Cunningham, T.M. (2021). How Police and Communities Can Move Forward Together. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_rights_magazine_hom e/civil-rights-reimagining-policing/how-police-and-communities-can-move- forward-together/ (Accessed October 22, 2018)

Curtis E Lemay Center. (N/A). A Primer on Doctrine. From briefing notes by then-Brigadier General Ronald Keys to a doctrine symposium, 1997. https://www.doctrine.af.mil/Portals/61/documents/Doctrine_Primer/ (Accessed October 22, 2018)

DOI: 10.59188/devotion.v5i6.741

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903411

Gomes, F. C., (2013). Human Resource Management. Yogyakarta: Andi

Gordon, A. (2022). Tunnel vision or the bigger picture? How a focus on enhanced governance can help reimagine corporate integrity. Global Integrity Report 2022. https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/insights/forensic-integrity-services/documents/ey-global-integrity-report-2022.pdf (Accessed October 23, 2018)

Homan, K. (N/A). Doctrine. https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/20080700_cscp_chapter_homan_doctrine.pdf (Accessed October 23, 2018)

IBLAM. (2023). Apa Saja Syarat Menjadi Advokat? Tugas dan Wewenangnya. Retrieved from https://iblam.ac.id/

DOI: 10.4236/blr.2024.153097

DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-101022-101333

Knies, E., Jacobsen, C., & Tummers, L. (2016). Leadership and Organizational Performance: State of the Art and a Research Agenda. Book The Routledge Companion to Leadership, 1st Edition, Imprint Routledge Book ISBN9781315739854. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/ (Accessed October 24, 2018)

Kozlowski, S.W.J. and Klein, K.J. (2000) A Multilevel Approach to Theory and Research in Organizations: Contextual, Temporal, and Emergent Processes. In: Klein K.J. and Kozlowski, S.W.J., Eds., Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

DOI: 10.1111/peps.12581

DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/202213400095

Launder, D., Morgan, M., and Crossman, G. (2018). Metropolitan Fire Service Organisational Doctrine. https://www.mfs.sa.gov.au/about-us/MFS-Organisational-Doctrine.pdf (Accessed October 24, 2018)

LeMay, C.E. (1968). The Role of Doctrine. Air University: The Intellectual and Leadership Center of the Air Force. https://www.doctrine.af.mil/Portals/61/documents/Doctrine%20101.pdf (Accessed October 25, 2018)

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870828

DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00273.x

DOI: 10.1002/casp.2730

MaPPI FH UI - Masyarakat Pemantau Peradilan Indonesia Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia bersama lembaga lain. (N/D). Laporan Pemantauan Jaksa Terhadap Integritas Jaksa Selama Proses Peradilan. https://mappifhui.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/10/laporan-integritas-jaksa_ MaPPI. pdf (Accessed October 25, 2018)

DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2019.1634237

Marzuki, P.M. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana

DOI: 10.55849/ijen.v1i2.303

DOI: 10.1177/0267659114559116

Merriam-Webster. (N.D.). Doctrine. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved November 1, 2024, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/doctrine

Miroslavov, M. (2024). Integrity In The Workplace: How To Harness Its Potential. https://www.officernd.com/blog/integrity-in-the-workplace/ (Accessed October 24, 2018)

DOI: 10.1080/09669760.2023.2238399

Odrakiewicz, P. (2012). Integrity and anticorruption actions in an organizational context. In Agata Stachowicz-Stanusch & Wolfgang Amann (eds.), Business integrity in practice: insights from international case studies. New York, N.Y.: Business Expert Press.

Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights/ODIHR. (2023). ODIHR Brief: Guiding Principles of Democratic Lawmaking and Better Laws. Warsaw, Poland Ul. Miodowa : the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR). ISBN 978-92-9271-129-0 (Accessed October 22, 2018)

Pande, Y., Rahmad, R.A., Irianto, Y., Syahban, R.A., & Alkadrie, S.M.R.R.R.M. (2024). Juridical Analysis of the Role of the Prosecutor’s Office in Criminal Law. International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 6 (3), 874-877. https://doi.org/10.56338/ijhess.v6i3.5827

Paul Tripp. (2018). The Importance of Doctrine. https://www.paultripp.com/articles/posts/theimportance-of-doctrine-article (Accessed October 23, 2018)

Persatuan Jaksa Indonesia. (N/A). Tri Krama Adhyaksa. https://pji.kejaksaan.go.id/index.php/home/tri_krama_adhyaksa (Accessed October 21, 2018).

Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press; American Psychological Association.

Rahim, N.A., Omar, K.B., & Kamaruddin, S.N. (2020). Integrity And Employee Job Performance. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(16), 517 – 521. ISSN- 2394-5125

DOI: 10.1177/0149206320929088

DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v29i2.363

DOI: 10.1287/orsc.13.1.18.543

DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2023.2251170

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2023.111014

Sudarto. (2005). Kapita Selekta Hukum Nasional, Bandung: Alumni

UNODC - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2014). The Status and Role of Prosecutors A United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime and International Association of Prosecutors Guide. Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/1407304_ebook.pdf (Accessed October 22, 2018).

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i21.14774

DOI: 10.59188/devotion.v5i6.741

DOI: 10.57235/jetish.v1i2.136

Wirawan, V., Manullang, S. O., & Sembiring, T. B. (2021). Law enforcement and democracy feeling among Indonesians during 2010 to 2020 (international publication analysis). International Journal of Social Sciences, 4 (2), 303-310. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijss.v4n2.1738

The United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. (1988). Chapter VI Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances - Document of the United Nations Economic and Social Council E/CONF.82/15, Corr.1 and Corr.2 (English only); and depositary notification C.N.31.1990.TREATIES-1 of 9 April 1990 (procès-verbal of rectification of original French and Spanish texts); C.N.229.2007.TREATIES-1 of 12 March 2007 (Notification under article 12 (2) of the Convention). Vienna, 20 December 1988. https://treaties.un.org/pages/viewdetails.aspx?src=treaty&mtdsg_no=vi-19&chapter=6&clang=_en (Accessed October 25, 2018)

The United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime. (2000). Chapter XVIII Penal Matters - The United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (United Nations, Treaty Series, volume 2225, No. 39574), article. 11, paragraph. 2. New York, 15 November 2000. https://treaties.un.org/pages/viewdetails.aspx?src=treaty&mtdsg_no=xviii-12&chapter=18&clang=_en (Accessed October 21, 2018).

The United Nations Convention against Corruption. (2003). Chapter XVIII Penal Matters - The United Nations Convention against Corruption (United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 2349, No. 42146), article 30, paragraph. 3. New York, 31 October 2003. https://treaties.un.org/pages/viewdetails.aspx?src=ind&mtdsg_no=xviii-14&chapter=18&clang=_en (Accessed October 22, 2018).

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.730284

Tim Hukumonline. (2023). Tugas dan Wewenang 5 Aparat Penegak Hukum di Indonesia. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/tugas-dan-wewenang-aparat-penegak-hukum-lt6230538b64c71/ (Accessed October 24, 2018).

Yadav, G.P. (2021). Impact of employee attitude on the performance of an organization, JIGYASA, 14 (III), 130-140. ISSN 0974-7648