Promoting transdisciplinary teaching and learning and research in a world that is faced with multifaceted challenges

Abstract

With a lot of transformation in higher education, teaching, and learning is becoming very complex. To cope with the transformation that is so complex, academics must be innovative in their teaching. Their teaching should also influence the behaviour of their students. Students after completion of their studies must also be able to solve the challenges of society. There are several approaches to teaching and learning such as multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and ideally transdisciplinary, scholarship of teaching and learning, evidence-based teaching and learning, transdisciplinary teaching and learning and competence-based teaching and learning, and deep learning approaches among others. This paper focuses on the transdisciplinary research and teaching and learning approach. The aim of the paper is to investigate the importance of transdisciplinary research, teaching, and learning in a world that is faced with multifaceted challenges. This is a qualitative design paper where systemic desktop research was used. The systematic reviews follow structured and predefined methods to identify, appraise, and synthesise the relevant literature. Desktop research is a research method that involves the use of existing data. These are secondary collected and summarised data to increase the overall effectiveness of the investigation. Secondary research is much more cost-effective than primary research, as it uses existing data, unlike primary empirical research. The secondary literature was collected based on the history, challenges, and benefits of transdisciplinary research, teaching, and learning. The research study concludes that transdisciplinary research and teaching and learning approach is the way to go in solving constant challenges that face the world. The study recommends that university faculties, schools, and departments should engage in transdisciplinary teaching, and learning and research.

Keywords: {'name': 'teaching approaches, mono-disciplinary, intra-disciplinary, inter-disciplinary, multi-disciplinary, trans-disciplinary'}

Authors & affiliations

Takalani Mashau
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.20472/TE.2018.6.2.004

Bergmann, M., Brohmann, B., Hoffmann, E., Loibl, M.C., Rehaag, R. Engelbert Schramm, E. & Voß, J. (2005). Quality Criteria of Transdisciplinary Research: A Guide for the Formative Evaluation of Research Projects. Frankfurt: Institute for Social-Ecological.

DOI: 10.1016/S1240-1307(00)80056-4

DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt32bt8g

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-58974-4_4

DOI: 10.1007/s10734-004-6382-9

Forrester, J.W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. M.I.T. Press Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 464pp.

DOI: 10.4995/HEAd20.2020.11084

Gibbs, P. (2022). A Transdisciplinary Currer. Journal of Educational Studies, 21(2): 6-17.

DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01039.x

DOI: 10.1215/01455532-28-4-575

Habermas, J. (1968). Erkenntnis und Interesse. In: J. Habermas (ed.). Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main, pp. 146–168.

Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Beacon Press, Boston, 465pp.

Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2, Lifeworld and System, A Critique of Functionalist Reason, Beacon Press, Boston, 457pp.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6699-3

DOI: 10.1037/amp0000319

DOI: 10.1016/S1240-1307(00)80056-4

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017

Jantsch, E. (1972). Towards Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Education and Innovation. In: L. Apostel et al. (eds.). Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and Center for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). Paris, pp. 97–121.

DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00028-X

DOI: 10.1023/A:1026569608656

DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.3

Knyazeva, E. (2011). Transdisciplinary Research Strategies. Vestnik ?GPU, Vol. 10 (112): 193-201.

DOI: 10.1080/13669871003703252

McGregor, S.L.T. (2017). Challenges of Transdisciplinary Collaboration: A Conceptual Literature Review. Integral Leadership review. Feature Articles / April-June 2017

DOI: 10.1007/s10734-021-00766-9

DOI: 10.19044/esj.2019.v15n19p247

National Academies (eds). (2005). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, The National Academies Press, Washington, 306pp.

Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity. New York: SUNY Press.

Parsons, T. (1968). The Structure of Social Action. Vols. I & II, The Free Press, New York, 775pp.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.02.008

DOI: 10.14512/9783962388638

DOI: 10.14512/gaia.26.1.10

DOI: 10.1007/s11251-007-9019-4

DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2022.2015133

Smother, M. 2020. Transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches. Best Practices, Resources, Teaching, Tips. 17, November 2020.

DOI: 10.1007/BF00139219

DOI: 10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2022.16.03.7

Wahome, M., Hills, J. & Morgera, E. (2022). Towards Interdisciplinarity-Which Route to Take? From: https://oneoceanhub.org/towards-transdisciplinarity-which-route-to-take/. 25.06.2023.

Weber, M. (1949). The Methodology of the Social Sciences (E.A. Shils and H.A. Finch, trans.), The Free Press, New York, 188pp.

DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1178