An examination of supporting structures for postgraduate students’ completion of research projects at one of the universities in South Africa
Takalani Samuel Mashau ORCID ↗ · Ravhuhali Fhatuwani
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023 · Vol. 12 / Issue 7 · 574-582
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:39 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The Council on Higher Education (CHE)’s report on the doctoral programme review states that offering postgraduate programmes seems to be a challenge to some South African universities. Amongst others, the report expresses that postgraduate supervision at universities suffers from many challenges, some of which result in students being delayed or not completing their studies. Underpinned by Archer’s (1998) theory of the interplay between structure, culture, and agency (support programmes), the study seeks to examine factors that hinder postgraduate students’ completion of their dissertations and theses. The study adopted narrative research where the qualitative design was used. Postgraduate students (Master and Doctoral) who have registered for these programmes repeatedly in the university served as participants in the study. The purposive sample was used to sample eight postgraduate students who have frequently registered for more than the required residency period. Semi-structured questions were formulated to guide data collection. Data was collected through a focus group of eight Master and Doctoral students. Collected data were analysed using the content analysis method. The study found that the university does not have adequate (or weak) supporting structures for students to complete their degrees in record time.
Keywords: {'name': 'Dissertations; Theses; Postgraduate students; Supervisors; Supporting structures.'}
Authors & affiliations
Takalani Samuel Mashau
Affiliation not supplied
Ravhuhali Fhatuwani
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.5539/hes.v4n4p1
DOI: 10.3844/jssp.2007.27.35
DOI: 10.2174/1874920800902010011
Archer, M. (1998). Social theory and the analysis of society. In T. M. Williams (ed.). Knowing the Social World. Buckingham: Open University Press.
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.807
Batchelor, D. and Di Napoli, R. (2006). The doctoral journey: Perspectives Educate, Vol. 6. (1). 13-24.
DOI: 10.47678/cjhe.v25i3.183223
Council on Higher Education. (2021). The National Review of Doctoral Qualifications 2020-2021-Review Panel Report. CHE.
Crane, L., Kinash, S., Hamlin, G. P., Eckersley, B., Partridge, H., & Bannatyne, A. (2016). Engaging postgraduate students and supporting higher education to enhance the 21st century student experience: Good Practice Guide prepared for the Learning and Teaching Support Unit, Australian Department of Education and Training. Retrieved from: http://PostgraduateStudentExperience.com. 31.01.2023.
Creswell, J.W. (2005.) Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Creswell, J.W. & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research design. (5th Ed). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Cryer, P. (2000). The Research Student’s Guide to Success. Buckingham: Open University Press.
DOI: 10.1108/09684880310471515
DOI: 10.1300/J067v22n03_09
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1910510116
DOI: 10.18820/2519593X/pie.v35i1.14
Haskins, N. H., Hermann-Turner, K., Pignato, L., Moses, A., & Olds, K. (2020). Phenomenological Experiences of Masters Students with University-Based Supervisors using a Cognitive Development Process. The Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, Vol. 13(2) http://dx.doi.org/10.7729/42.1331
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.078
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-009-9199-8
DOI: 10.1080/01580370701424650
Onwuegbuzi, A.J. & Teddlie, C. (2003). A Framework of analyzing data in mixed methods research. In Tashakori, A & Teddlie,C. (Eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research. (p351 – 383) Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Prazeres, F. (2017). PhD supervisor-student relationship. Journal of Advance Medical Education Professional, Vol. 5(4). 220-221.
DOI: 10.17810/2015.38
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.004
Schulze, S. (2003). Research Methodology, Study Guide. University of South Africa. Pretoria: Muckleneuk.
Schulze, S. (2011). A survey of students’ views of supervision at Unisa. South African Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 25(4). 784-802.
DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v4i1.134
DOI: 10.1080/713688410
DOI: 10.14804/3-1-55