CiteNScope — Scholarly Index & Analytics
Discover / IJRBSPUBLICATION RECORD

Market opportunities impact on SME’s entrepreneurial behavior: study on entrepreneurial orientation in North Macedonia

Elena Gjorevska ORCID ↗

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023 · Vol. 12 / Issue 8 · 104-118

Research reach

Publication metrics

External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.

Dimensions

Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.

CROSSREF CITATIONS1

Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

OpenAlex · Citations1Cached provider observation

Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC

Mendeley · Readers11Cached provider observation

Observed 22 Oct 2026 01:24 UTC

OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.

OpenAlex / Citation year

Annual citations to this article

View provider totals ↑

Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.

2017–2026 Annual history last updated:

Citations received

OpenAlex · year of the citing work

OpenAlex

Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.

2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.

View data & coverage

2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.

Overview

Abstract

Despite being acknowledged as the primary catalyst for economic development, entrepreneurship in emerging markets contends with multiple constraints. The availability of unexploited business opportunities certainly raises the entrepreneurial potential of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Entrepreneurial orientation strategy strongly supports SMEs to improve their position in the market by instilling the courage to explore new prospects and take risks, promote innovation, act proactively on the market, and establish autonomy and competitive aggressiveness as norms in their operations. This research focuses on the entrepreneurial orientation approach as a key firm-level phenomenon and its influence on business performance in emerging markets. More specifically, the study elaborates on SMEs’ risk-taking, innovativeness, pro-activeness, autonomy, and competitive aggressiveness under the moderating influence of unexploited opportunities. A multiple-case study technique was used to develop the five propositions generated from the conceptual framework of the study. Six companies operating in the private healthcare sector in North Macedonia actively participated in the research, contributing a substantial body of data. According to the study findings, the unexploited opportunities have a reasonably large effect on SMEs’ entrepreneurial orientation activities and corresponding performance. Nonetheless, despite the hostile entrepreneurial environment, SMEs have demonstrated boldness in taking risks, initiating innovation, and continuity in taking proactive actions in the private healthcare industry.

Keywords: {'name': 'entrepreneurial orientation'}, {'name': 'emerging markets'}, {'name': "SMEs' performance"}, {'name': 'business opportunities'}

Authors & affiliations

Elena Gjorevska
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1111/1467-8268.12190

DOI: 10.1002/smj.2298

Barreira (2004). The influence of business knowledge and work experience, as antecedents to entrepreneurial success. University of Pretoria. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/27470

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195131444.001.0001

Buttner, E. H., & Moore, D. P. (1997). Women's Organizational Exodus to Entrepreneurship: Self-Reported Motivations and Correlates with Success. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(1), 34–46.

Cantillon, R. (1755). Essai sur la Nature du Commerce en Général. London: Frank Gas and Company Ltd.

DOI: 10.1016/0883-9026(94)90011-6

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00482.x

DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250100107

DOI: 10.5465/256406

DOI: 10.2307/2393031

DOI: 10.2307/41165126

DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.01.015

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.037

DOI: 10.1007/s11187-005-6454-y

DOI: 10.1016/0883-9026(90)90015-L

DOI: 10.1177/104225870202600405

Kusumawardhani, A., McCarthy, G., & Perera, N. (2009). Framework of entrepreneurial orientation and networking: a study of SMEs performance in a developing country. Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management Conference (pp. 1-16).

DOI: 10.4337/9781849806947

Lee, L. T. S., & Sukoco, B. M. (2007). The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and knowledge management capability on organizational effectiveness in Taiwan: the moderating role of social capital. International Journal of Management, 24(3), 549.

DOI: 10.5465/3069392

DOI: 10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568

DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00048-3

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00280.x

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00457.x

Olafsen, E., & Cook, P. A. (2016). Growth entrepreneurship in developing countries: preliminary literature review. Washington, DC: The World Bank

DOI: 10.3390/economies10060139

DOI: 10.1093/wbro/lku012

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. [e-book] Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.

DOI: 10.5465/amr.2000.2791611

Stevenson, H. H. (1983). A perspective on entrepreneurship (Vol. 13). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.

Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(5), 17–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486667

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.942

DOI: 10.1177/1465750319874592

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00246.x