Democratic utopianism: still searching for the truest meaning of democracy

Abstract

The objects of this research are: first, to explore the concept of democracy and its different meanings. Second, to highlight the shortcomings of living in a democratic country. Third, to explore the political leverage and potential dangers posed by members of elite democracy on the masses. Fourth, to warn political leaders of the setback of relying on a system of government that is nonexistent or practiced in its truest form. The researcher investigated the following: Divergent meanings and interpretations of democracy identified some shortcomings associated with democracy and the dangers of the powerful elite who are political leaders imposed on citizens. The main results of the research: first, there is no single country in the world that can rightfully hold claim to practicing democracy in its truest form. Second, democracy is an ideal system of government we all aspired to have, and third, the elite class has manipulated democratic processes to ensure their perpetual dominance over the masses. Fourth, democracy needs to be instituted properly and effectively for the benefit of citizens. The area of practical use of the research: all citizens living in a country where democracy is practiced, political leaders, political party members, students, workers, and public office holders, employees of regional and global organizations.

Authors & affiliations

Shaka Yesufu
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.8

Benoist, A. (2011). The Problem of Democracy. UK, Atorks Media Ltd.

Burnham, J. (1943). The Machiavellians. Defenders of freedom. London: Putnam & Co; 1943.

DOI: 10.2307/1289333

DOI: 10.1093/0199271410.001.0001

Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Dewey, J. (2001). Democracy and Education. Pennsylvania State University Press.

Francis, R. (1999). Moral Principles and Political Obligations Ethics. USA. Cornell. University Press.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2810070

Heywood, A. (2013). Political Ideologies: An Introduction. 3rd Edition. London. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hirst, J. (2004). The Distinctiveness of Australian Democracy. Papers on Parliament No.42 December 2004.

DOI: 10.1017/S0034670500038286

Keane. J. (2009) The Life and Death of Democracy, London 2009, 169–176.

DOI: 10.1080/0023656X.2021.1897091

Lanzaro, J. (2016). Foundations of Pluralist Democracy and Political Structure of the State of Uruguay. Rev. Urug. Cienc. Polit. Vol.1. Montevideo.

Levistsky, S. and Ziblatt. (2018). How Democracies Die. New York: Crown Publishers.

Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

DOI: 10.4159/9780674286627

DOI: 10.4159/9780674984776

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-02001-7_6

Noddings, N. (2013). Education and democracy in the 21st Century. New York Teachers College Press.

Ober, J. (1991). Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People. New Jersey. Princeton University Press.

DOI: 10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3

Seymour, M.L. and Lakin, J. (2004). The democratic Century. Oklahoma: Oklahoma University Press.

Somin, I. (2013). Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government is Smarter, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

DOI: 10.1080/17449642.2019.1588004

DOI: 10.1017/S0007123412000294

DOI: 10.1111/papa.12036

Wing, K.W. (1995). Towards Democracy in a New South Africa. Michigan Journal of International Law. Volume 16:5 1-25.

Yencken, D. (2008). Issues of our time: Democracy in Australia Picture. www. Future laws.com.Au.

Yesufu, S. (2017). The Reality of Crime and Policing the UK and South Africa. Cape Town. South Africa.

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198813972.003.0008