Effects of leadership accountability on commitment and engagement within the various sectors of the South African economy
Matsidiso Nehemia Naong
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024 · Vol. 6 / Issue 5 · 68-77
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC
Observed 22 Oct 2026 02:40 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 16:12 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
Myriad research studies across the spectrum continue to emphasize one common goal, namely, sustained desired performance/results. Such an outcome is dependent on employees’ commitment and engagement among others and is a function of astute leadership. This study aimed to contribute empirically to an understanding of and determine the effect of leadership on organizational commitment and engagement among the workforce, especially during and post-crisis. The study adopted a deductive i.e., quantitative research approach, that is descriptive in nature. It used a cross-sectional survey research design in a five-point Likert scale to randomly collect data from 220 dispatched questionnaires to participants across various sectors of the economy in the Free State Province. A total of 181 questionnaires were collected for data analysis, yielding a response rate of 82%. The standard multiple regression analysis (MRA) and interpretation were conducted to assess the relationship between independent and dependent variables. The MRA results reveal that both leadership (?= 0.332) and ownership/accountability (?= 0.346) have a positive and statistically significant (p-values <0.05) impact on organisational commitment/engagement. Leadership and ownership/accountability reflect a significant power of predictability towards organisational commitment/engagement (F = 44.106; R2= 0.361; p<0.05) of the respondents. To ensure sustained exceptional performance, advocating for a servant-leadership culture, and being fearless of being led, will most likely inspire confidence, engagement and commitment among the workforce. The study provides empirical evidence of the positive effect of leadership on commitment and engagement, confirming that these independent variables are predictors of the dependent variables namely, employee commitment and engagement.
Keywords: {'name': 'Accountability, engagement, free state province, leadership, ownership, organizational commitment'}
Authors & affiliations
Matsidiso Nehemia Naong
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.1002/csr.1806
DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0008
DOI: 10.1007/s12529-022-10086-6
DOI: 10.1057/s41291-019-00059-1
DOI: 10.1186/s12960-016-0171-2
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102462
DOI: 10.56225/finbe.v1i3.120
DOI: 10.1177/0047287514522878
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.013
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.831060
DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-06-2020-0342
DOI: 10.3926/ic.476
Kline, R.B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guildford Press.
Kouzes, J. & Posner, B. (2012). The Leadership Challenge: How to Make Extraordinary Things Happen in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
DOI: 10.1201/9781003079651
DOI: 10.1177/2158244019899085
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00268
DOI: 10.4324/9781315088754
Mead, E. (n.d.) Ownership and Accountability: The Key to More Effective Results. Center for Management & Organisation Effectiveness. https://cmoe.com/blog/ownership-accountability.
Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS Survival Manual, (4th ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212091
Quantum Workplace. (n.d). What is Employee Engagement? What, Why, and How to Improve It. https://www.quantumworkplace.com/future-of-work/what-is-employee-engagement-definition
DOI: 10.1111/beer.12227
Ruscio, G. (2023). The Vital Role HR Plays In Employee Engagement. Blink, July 6, 2023. https://joinblink.com/intelligence/role-of-hr-employee-engagement/
DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-12-2014-0243
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754556
DOI: 10.1177/0013164405282471
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795117
Shirina, S., Sharma, R., Agarwal, R.N. & Sao, A. (2023). The Relationship Between Employee Engagement, Employee Retention and Employee Performance in Higher Education Institutions. RES MILITARIS – Social Science Journal, 13(2): 6506–6522. https://resmilitaris.net/menu-script/index.php/resmilitaris/article/view/3365/2642
Stephanie, D.K., Robin, R.A. & Hermen, D. (2022). Leadership strategies amidst disruption and shock. Communication Implications. 2022;14(1):36?58.
Strachan, C. (2020). How to build a culture of ownership and accountability. Grindstone Blog, 27 April 2020. https://grindstonecapital.co.uk/how-build-culture-ownership-accountability/
DOI: 10.14453/aabfj.v15i1.7
DOI: 10.1111/ijsa.12256
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3205040
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.729131
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.106934