Corporate ESG issues and retail investors’ investment decision: a moral awareness perspective
Rounok Nafisa · Alam Mohammad Ashraful · Aimin Qian
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science · 2023 · Vol. 12 / Issue 9 · 113-125
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 07:22 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 22:04 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The specific goal of this study is to find out how retail investors consider company ESG issues while making investment decisions, with their moral awareness (MA) serving as a moderator. The framework's foundations are the norm activation model (NAM) and the theory of planned behavior (TPB). The report is based on a questionnaire survey that was completed by 599 retail investors in Dhaka and Chattagram, Bangladesh. To examine the data and verify the theories, the PLS path modeling approach is employed. Six hypotheses are investigated using structural equation modeling; five are found to be significant and one to be non-significant. All of the hypotheses are positive. The findings of the research demonstrate that when making investment decisions, investors take a company's social, environmental, and governance issues into account. The moral awareness of investors seems to influence their investment decisions as well. By presenting empirical data on the relationship between business ESG issues and investment decisions with moderating impacts on investors' moral awareness, the paper advances the field of behavioral finance research. It implies that corporate advertising tactics may support global reporting requirements, draw impact investors, and promote moral and environmental education. To safeguard ESG concerns and promote sustainable growth of the capital market and economy, governments should enact laws, rules, and directives.
Keywords: {'name': 'ESG, TPB, NAM, Moral Awareness, CSR, Behavioral Finance'}
Authors & affiliations
Rounok Nafisa
Affiliation not supplied
Alam Mohammad Ashraful
Affiliation not supplied
Aimin Qian
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2014.0394
DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Barclay, et al., 1995
DOI: 10.1177/0007650310362865
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0868-z
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1567-0
DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(94)90026-4
Brown, N. (2014). The Investor trip to Bangladesh, is a race to the top underway? And if so, who will win? Retrieved May 26, 2015, from http://www.alliancetrustinvestments.com/sri-hub/posts/51638/July/Bangladesh-Investor-TripBurns and Bush, 2006
DOI: 10.1177/0018726700537004
Chaudary, S., and Ali, M. (2016). The spillover effect of CSR initiatives on consumer attitude and purchase intent: The role of customer-company identification with the moderating effect of awareness. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 10(2), 368-387.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling, Modern methods for business research, Vol. 295 No. 2, pp 295-336.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.006
DOI: 10.1023/A:1006102802904
DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-02-2016-0049
DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2014-0017
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v61.n2.2716
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2307-4
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
European SRI Study, (2014), https://www.eurosif.org/press-room/6th-sustainable-and-responsible-investment-study-2014. Accessed on 12/02/2021.
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2008-0
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction
to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
DOI: 10.1177/002224378101800104
DOI: 10.1108/17468800710824509
Gray, R., Owen, D., and Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and accountability: changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Prentice Hall.
DOI: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2348-1_7
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550036
DOI: 10.1080/09638180802016627
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001
DOI: 10.1002/joe.22011
Joyner, B. E., Payne, D., and Raiborn, C. A. (2002). Building values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility into the developing organization. Journal of developmental entrepreneurship, 7(1), 113.
DOI: 10.1108/03074351011042955
Keefe, J. F. (2007). From SRI to sustainable investing. Green Money Journal.
DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-12-2017-0141
DOI: 10.1177/a010699
DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2004.05.001
McKinsey/KIOD (2003) Survey on Corporate Governance.
DOI: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033104.28219.92
Michel T. J. Rakotomavo (2011) Preferences of retail investors and institutions for corporate social performance, Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 1:2, 93-102, https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2011.582322
DOI: 10.1006/bare.1999.0108
DOI: 10.2307/25148722
DOI: 10.1108/09513570610656105
DOI: 10.1108/CG-09-2014-0102
DOI: 10.1108/20412561311324104
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-4254(98)10007-8
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.1991.tb00003.x
DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. 4th Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Smith, K. (2002). ISO considers corporate social responsibility standards. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 25(3), 42.
Sultana, Sayema & Zainal, Dalilawati. (2017). The Influence of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) on Investment Decisions: The Bangladesh Perspective. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities. 25.
DOI: 10.3390/su10061831
TRCRI. (2013). Thomson Reuters Corporate Responsibility Indices, 2013. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/content/dam/ewp-m/documents/thomsonreuters/en/pdf/corporate-responsibility/2013-cr-report.pdf
DOI: 10.1142/9789811228001_0195
United Nations Global Compact (UNGC).(2004). Who care wins. Retrieved January 22, 2021, from www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/ Financial_markets/who_cares_who_wins.pdf United Nations, 2018.
UNPRI, (2015, July 15). United Nations Priciples of Responsible Investments. Retrieved from https://www.unpri.org.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.10.009
DOI: 10.5840/ruffinx2002313
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00557.x
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2016.10.002
Wei, J. T., and Wang, I. M. (2016). Environmental Disclosure, Investors’investment Decisions And Their Perceptions Of The Credibility Of Management. Global Journal of Business Research, 10(4), 17-25.
DOI: 10.1080/15427560709337016
DOI: 10.3390/su13084548
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.036
Zramdini, O., and Fedhila, H. (2003). La perception de l’utilité de l’information à caractère social et environnemental pour la décision d’octroi de crédits: Cas des banques commerciales tunisiennes. La Revue du Financier, 141.