Scorched-earth democratic South Africa: Governance utopianisms as derivatives of scientific dogma

Abstract

This article explores theorisation that identifies the locus of South Africa’s scorched-earth lived experiences in the fixation on scientific dogma and conceptual binaries as well as governance utopianisms, wherein the latter are derivatives of the former. It explores South African’s lived experiences over the past 28 years in order to demonstrate that politicians’ reverence for governance utopianism has failed to appreciate the unity of realities, facts, values, objectivities, subjectivities, permanences, fluxes and changes, which consist of complex intricacies that are not amenable to dogmatic “incontrovertibly true” sets of authoritative principles and catchy governance utopianisms, because humanity’s imagination and creative thought are experimental in nature given the diversity of spatialities and “geography differences.” From desktop-based research literature survey and theorisation, the article advances a theoretical argument that if “science is one,” and if reality is unitary, then fragmentary theories and models are creatures of humanity’s world of imperfections. Additionally, the article analyses statistical evidence drawn from Statistics South Africa (StatsSA) in order to demonstrate that the scorched-earth metaphor is real for South Africa’s 28-year democratic governance. It finds that in South Africa’s twenty-eight years of democratic experiment, lived experiences resemble scorched-earth metaphor with no silver lining in sight. Philosophically, the paper concludes that if what resides on God’s left is on humanity’s right, then the “rightness” and/or “leftness” of people consists of intractable complexities of particularity, individuality and incommunicability that have led to fragmentary science, fixation on dogma and binaries as well as politicians’ reverence for governance utopianisms, simultaneously as society’s lived experiences resemble normalised scorched-earth.

Keywords: {'name': 'Science, Scientific Dogma, Unitary Realities, Corruption, South Africa'}

Authors & affiliations

Johannes Tsheola
Affiliation not supplied

Mokoko Piet Sebola
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.1080/18186874.2021.1962725

Bennun, M. (2023). Vandalisation of Walter Sisulu Square: A tragic metaphor for the wrecking of South Africa. Daily Maverick, July 26, 2023.

Boesak, A. (2023). Allan Boesak declines invitation to August UDF celebration. Independent Online, August 09, 2023.

Calland, R. & Sithole, M.D. (2021). South Africa since 1994: A mixed bag of presidents and patchy institution-building. The Conversation, July 21, 2021.

DOI: 10.1080/03057070.2016.1143208

Croucamp, P.A. & Malan, L. (2018). The theory of systemic patronage and state capture: The liberal democratic project and its regime contenders. African Journal of Public Affairs, 10(4): 86-105.

DOI: 10.4102/nc.v82i0.58

DOI: 10.7196/SAJBL.2022.v15i3.741

DOI: 10.1111/saje.12248

DOI: 10.1177/1065912916639137

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226242088.001.0001

DOI: 10.1086/495041

Gcabashe, N. (2023). A cycle of collective violence continues to cast a long shadow over our path toward social cohesion. Daily Maverick, September 25, 2023.

Given, L.M. (2011). The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods: Grand Theory. London: Sage Publications.

Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M. & Whatmore, S. (2009). The Dictionary of Human Geography, (5th edn.). London: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.

Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Harvey, E. (2022). Ramaphosa delivers same old lies at ANC policy conference about moribund NDR. News24, August 04, 2022.

DOI: 10.4135/9781446217603

DOI: 10.18820/24150479/aa49i2.3

DOI: 10.5539/jpl.v10n4p55

Maharaj, B., Desai, A. & Bond, P. (eds.). (2011). Zuma’s Own Goal: Losing South Africa’s “War on Poverty.” Trenton: Africa World Press, Inc.

Mamabolo, M.A. & Tsheola, J.P. (2017). Political-economy of land governance in a democratic South Africa: Private interests vis-à-vis rural communities in tribal settlements. African Journal of Public Affairs, 9(5): 154-167.

Martin, M.E. & Solomon, H. (2016). Understanding the phenomenon of “state capture” in South Africa. Southern African Peace and Security Studies, 5(1): 21-34.

DOI: 10.2307/1891592

Mkandawire, T. (2011). Running while others walk: Knowledge and the challenge of Africa’s development. African Development, XXXVI(2): 1-36.

DOI: 10.1108/03068291111157267

O’Malley Archive, (n.d.). The Heart of Hope. https://omalley.nelsonmandela.org/omalley/index.php/site/q/03lv02424/04lv02730/05lv03 (Accessed: August 04, 2022).

Pareto, V. (1897). Cours D’Economie Politique. Lausanne: Rouge.

Republic of South Africa (RSA), (1996). The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. Pretoria: Government Printers.

Statistics South Africa (StatsSA), (2022). Statistics by Theme. https://www.statssa.gov.za (Accessed: August 01, 2022).

Suttner, R. (2022). The current crisis in the ANC and South Africa makes a “new politics” all the more urgent. Daily Maverick, August 01, 2022.

Theodat, J-M. (2022). The dialectic of places. In McCusker, B., Ahmed, W., Ramutsindela, M. & Solis, P. (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Development and Environment. London: Routledge, pp.348-353.

The Presidency, (2021). Report of the Expert Panel into the July 2021 Civil Unrest. Pretoria: Government Printers.

DOI: 10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00027-6

DOI: 10.1023/A:1026013222518

Tsheola, J. (2012a). Theorising a democratic developmental state: Issues of public service delivery planning and violent protests in South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 47(1): 161-179.

DOI: 10.17265/1537-1514/2012.02.003

Tsheola, J. (2013). State capitalism, meta-governance, state-capital nexus and state activism paradoxes in the Gauteng freeways. Journal of Public Administration, 48(1): 35-50.

Tsheola, J. & Lukhele, T. (2014). South Africa’s twenty years of “civilising missions” for Africa: Faded continental posture and agenda. Journal of Public Administration, 49(1): 375-391.

Tsheola, J. (2017). Governance of the party, state and society triad in a democratic South Africa. African Journal of Public Affairs, 9(5): 8-22.

Tsheola, J. & Makhudu, O. (2017). Idealism of neoliberalism, economics, employment and earnings in South Africa: Demystifying “financialisation” and the productionist industry. Journal of Global Business and Technology, 13(2): 96-108.

Tsheola, J., Ramoroka, T. & Sebola, M. (2017). South Africa’s “structural power:” “Competition” states in the globality of private economies of selected countries. Journal of Global Business and Technology, 13(2): 82-95.

Tsheola, J.P. & Mmotlana, L. (2018). Politics of land investments, informalities, exclusionary planning and risk exposure in South African urbanism. African Journal of Public Affairs, 10(2): 163-182.

Tsheola, J.P. & Molefe, P. (2019). African despotic autocratism: Elite self-serving democracy, nationalism, corruption and state violence. African Journal of Public Affairs, 11(1): 14-33.

Tsheola, J., Ramonyai, N. & Segage, M. (2014). Twenty years of faltering “democracy:” Service delivery planning and public participation in South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 49(1): 392-405.

Tsheola, J.P. & Sebola, M.P. (2012). Post-apartheid public service delivery and the dilemmas of state capitalism in South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 47(si-1): 228-250.

Wooldridge, A. (2012). State capitalism: The visible hand. The Economist, 402(8768): 1-14.

World Health Organisation (WHO), (2022). WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Covid-19.who.int (Accessed: July 09, 2022).