Digital transformation and its role in FMCG supply chain resilience
Kudakwashe Tazvivinga ORCID ↗ · Alexander Samuels ORCID ↗
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy · 2024 · Vol. 6 / Issue 5 · 23-38
Publication metrics
External links open provider records or DOI searches. Provider counts are not combined. Mendeley readership measures saves, not citations.
Dimensions
Live provider badge. If unavailable, use the Dimensions link above.
Observed 21 Oct 2026, 00:14 UTC
Observed 21 Oct 2026 00:14 UTC
OpenAlex and Mendeley observations refresh on article visits, at most once per 24 hours. Unavailable data is not zero. Google Scholar opens a DOI search.
Citations received by this article, grouped by the year of the citing work. Crossref and OpenAlex lifetime totals remain separate in Publication metrics.
2017–2026 Annual history last updated:
Citations received
OpenAlex · year of the citing work
Hover over a year or focus the chart and use arrow keys to inspect values.
2017–2026 annual-history window. 2026 is year to date. Unknown years have gaps.
View data & coverage
2026 is incomplete. Within a successfully fetched ten-year window, omitted years mean zero. Years beyond a saved observation’s window remain unknown (—). Older citations are excluded, so this chart’s sum may differ from the OpenAlex lifetime total. The date above belongs to this annual history; an unsuccessful refresh keeps the previous observation.
Abstract
The main aim was to determine how the supply chains of the FMCG industry may enhance their resilience through the adoption of digital technologies. Additionally, enhancing visibility and transparency through the augmentation of operational efficiency to elevate overall performance. This analysis utilised the Uncertainty Framework theory, which provides a systematic approach for identifying, categorising, and managing uncertainties within the supply chain. Organisations can formulate strategies to effectively manage and mitigate risks by understanding the many dimensions of uncertainty within the supply chain and their interrelations. The research utilised a qualitative methodology, gathering data via semi-structured interviews with 25 supply chain specialists and senior executives possessing extensive experience in the FMCG sector. The study's findings indicate that digital transformation enhances agility, transparency, and data-driven decision-making, which is crucial for bolstering the resilience of the FMCG supply chain. Six themes emerged from the findings: data-driven decision-making, supply chain visibility and transparency, automation and robots, collaborative platforms and ecosystems, predictive analytics and forecasting, and traceability and sustainability. The research will enhance our understanding of the implementation of digital transformation initiatives throughout FMCG supply chains. This involves analysing the application of digital technologies in supply chain operations. The study may ascertain the impact of these technologies on various resilience criteria, including flexibility, agility, visibility, and responsiveness, by analysing the role of digital transformation in FMCG supply chains. The research findings can assist supply chain managers in making educated decisions on investments and strategic planning for digital transformation initiatives.Research on digital transformation in the FMCG sector is limited, particularly on these unprecedented upheavals. Moreover, there is little study connecting digital transformation with sustainability and resilience in FMCG supply chains, which is essential for comprehending how these projects might collaboratively enhance robust supply systems.
Keywords: {'name': 'Digital, transformation, role, FMCG, supply chain, resilience '}
Authors & affiliations
Kudakwashe Tazvivinga
Affiliation not supplied
Alexander Samuels
Affiliation not supplied
Deposited references
Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.
DOI: 10.30574/msarr.2024.10.2.0067
DOI: 10.3390/computers13030072
DOI: 10.4324/9781351044516
DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-05-2020-0187
DOI: 10.1109/MIE.2020.2979272
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2923270
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-5727-6.ch002
DOI: 10.1049/PBHE029E
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-96729-1_40
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.05.034
DOI: 10.1063/1.4959406
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
DOI: 10.1111/jbl.12368
DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01680-4
DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2021.1993179
DOI: 10.1109/COMITCon.2019.8862269
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
DOI: 10.30534/ijeter/2019/257112019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108790
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102067
DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2021.100718
DOI: 10.1108/SCM-04-2018-0152
DOI: 10.1201/9781003189640-5
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62412-5_20
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-89963-5.00003-4
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-04749-6
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-6859-3.ch007
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8081-3.ch010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-38424-1
DOI: 10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2022-0064
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-09179-7_9
DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2022.2067509
DOI: 10.1002/9781119836667.ch3
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102187
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-48479-7_41
DOI: 10.1007/s12063-023-00375-y
DOI: 10.1201/9781003298335-6
DOI: 10.4324/9780367855758-4
DOI: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.8554
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466
DOI: 10.1177/21582440211047576
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2023.2179346
DOI: 10.1201/9781003180302-19
DOI: 10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100029
DOI: 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
DOI: 10.1108/JBIM-04-2019-0154
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-92224-5
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-4895-3.ch008
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2185
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1332437
DOI: 10.3390/su15065185
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13908
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.053
DOI: 10.1109/IEEM55944.2022.9989852
DOI: 10.1109/SmartCloud58862.2023.00028
DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.K2559.0981119
DOI: 10.1108/S1877-636120220000027013
DOI: 10.1515/9783110990461
DOI: 10.3390/su151310107
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.056
DOI: 10.1177/1609406919899220
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-491-8_13
DOI: 10.1108/DTS-08-2023-0061
DOI: 10.1109/ASYU58738.2023.10296770
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-4483-2.ch010
DOI: 10.3139/104.112135
DOI: 10.3390/info14020085
DOI: 10.19030/iber.v14i1.9033
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-97877-8_6
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-7455-6.ch009
Räisänen, S. (2024). Exploring consumer preferences in fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) e-commerce—Case study: Company X.
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-8296-5_4
Ranger, S. (2020). The Internet of Things explained: What the IoT is and where it’s going next.
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12834
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-7298-9.ch001
DOI: 10.1002/9781119564034.ch3
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (pp. 1–440).
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-4991-2.ch003
DOI: 10.1201/9781003288084
DOI: 10.3390/logistics8010027
DOI: 10.1201/9781003248750-16
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102594
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122978
DOI: 10.1111/jbl.12366
DOI: 10.1080/07366981.2020.1847813
Tarut?, A., Duobien?, J., Klovien?, L., Vitkauskait?, E., & Varani?t?, V. (2018). Identifying factors affecting digital transformation of SMEs.
DOI: 10.3389/fbloc.2023.1142599
DOI: 10.1109/MTS.2021.3123750
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-95947-0_48
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-7654-6_3
Wang, B., Zhu, K., Xue, Y., Bai, J., Zang, J., Xie, H., & Yang, H. (2023). Digital transformation mode and strategy of SMEs in China. China Mechanical Engineering, 34(14), 1756.
DOI: 10.3390/su15118553
DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2023.4.003
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-22917-w
DOI: 10.1108/JEIM-09-2022-0333
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-2842-9_5
DOI: 10.3390/su14052549
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108817
DOI: 10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2020-0038