The pitfalls or gaps in monitoring and evaluation tools during Coronavirus disease 2019 era in South African municipalities

Abstract

The South African municipalities have continued to demonstrate weaknesses or inadequacies in monitoring and evaluation (M&E). A possible barrier in South African municipalities is a lack of M&E expertise. While M&E can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and efficiency of a programme, some potential pitfalls and gaps were discovered during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A case study design was employed to conduct in-depth and detailed examination within two metropolitan municipalities in the Eastern Cape. A mixed methods approach was adopted in a convergent manner for data collection and analysis. In-depth interviews were utilised to collect data from 13 senior municipal managers at the Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality (NMBM) and the Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality (BCMM). A total of 191 questionnaires were despatched to municipal employees and 186 were returned, giving a 97% response rate. The findings reflect the weaknesses of M&E policies in the municipalities and paints a picture of M&E not being prioritised in the municipality.  The findings also reflect the current situation at the municipalities concerned, which is that there are pitfalls and gaps when it comes to evaluation measures. Thus, the study concludes that accountability for financial and performance management is non-existent. This study attempts to make a valuable contribution by providing technical assistance, capacity building to ensure that municipalities have effective M&E systems in place to monitor and evaluate service delivery and improve the lives of communities.

Keywords: {'name': 'Accountability; cooperative governance; evaluation; information management; service delivery'}

Authors & affiliations

Babalo Yekani
Affiliation not supplied

Bethuel Sibongiseni Ngcamu
Affiliation not supplied

Sareesha Pillay
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.4102/aej.v10i1.674

DOI: 10.1177/03091325211016072

DOI: 10.1108/AJEMS-04-2013-0036

DOI: 10.1016/j.crte.2004.11.004

Awasthi, S. (2020). A robust monitoring and evaluation system can prove effective during pandemics. Available at: https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/opinion-a-robust-monitoring-evaluation-system-can-prove-effective-during-pandemics/354701 [Accessed 24 July 2022].

DOI: 10.4102/aej.v9i1.553

DOI: 10.1108/JAOC-10-2020-0160

Bandalos, D.L. (2018). Measurement theory and applications for the social sciences. London: Guilford Press.

DOI: 10.4324/9781315730592

DOI: 10.4135/9781848607927.n14

Department of Cooperative Governance & Traditional Affairs (COGTA). (2023). Eastern Cape Provincial Evaluation Seminar for Local Government. Pretoria.

De Vries, S. & Ile, I. (2021). Low Hanging Fruit for Improved Governance Through Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation System in South Africa: With Specific Reference to Ward Committee’s System. African Journal of Public Affairs, 12(1), 99-113. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-ajpa_v12_n1_a7

Dlamini, P.C. & Migiro, S. (2016). Performance monitoring and evaluation systems in the South African local government. Journal of Public Administration, 51(3): 376–389. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC199995

Dullah Omar Institute. (2020). Municipal planning and budgeting during COVID-19: What happened in practice? Cape Town: University of the Western Cape.

Du Toit, D., Knipe, A., Van Niekerk, D., Van der Walt, G. & Doyle, M. (2002). Service excellence in governance. Cape Town: Heinemann.

DOI: 10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.46

Evans, A. (2020). A pivotal year for monitoring and evaluation: Building and improving monitoring and evaluation capacity worldwide is key to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals within ten years. Available at: https://ieg.worldbankgroup.org/blog/pivotal-year-monitoring-and-evaluation [Accessed 12 October 2022].

DOI: 10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0085.pub2

Gómez, R., Olivera, M. & Velasco, M. (2009). Implementing sub-national results oriented management and budget system: Lessons from Medellin, Colombia. Colombia ECD Working Paper Series, No. 19. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232076

Ile, I.U., Eresia-Eke, C.E. & Allen-Ile, C. (2019). Monitoring and evaluation of policies, programmes and projects. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

DOI: 10.4102/aej.v5i2.240

DOI: 10.4103/IJAM.IJAM_7_18

DOI: 10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064

DOI: 10.1596/0-8213-5823-5

Lahey, R. (2005). Moving towards results-based performance measurement: Building M&E capacity in ASEZA: Phase 1: Discovery phase. ASEZA: USAID.

Leedy, P.D. & Ormrod, J.E., (2021). Practical research: Planning and design, 12th edn., Pearson Education, Harlow.

DOI: 10.5751/ES-02133-120226

Mackay, K. (2006). Institutionalization of monitoring and evaluation systems to improve public sector management, Evaluation Capacity Development Working Paper Series, No. 15, The World Bank, Washington, DC.

Majola, M. (2014). The implementation of government-wide monitoring and evaluation system in South Africa: A provincial case study of the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Economic Development and Tourism. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal.

Mantzaris, E. & Ngcamu, B.S. (2020b). Municipal corruption in the era of a COVID-19 pandemic: Four South African case studies. Journal of Public Administration, 55(3/1), 461–479. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-jpad-v55-n3-1-a4

DOI: 10.4102/aej.v6i1.255

DOI: 10.4102/aej.v10i1.635

DOI: 10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.42

DOI: 10.4102/td.v14i1.409

Mlambo, V.H. & Masuku, M.M. (2020). Corruption and COVID-19: The final nail in the coffin for South Africa’s dwindling public finances. Journal of Public Administration, 55(3/1): 449–587. https://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/355

Mofolo, M.A. & Yekani, B. (2022). A review of design, functionality, and effectiveness of the municipal performance management system in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Mbali International Conference Proceedings 2022. 349-374

DOI: 10.4102/aej.v10i1.622

DOI: 10.1177/0002039720925826

DOI: 10.4102/apsdpr.v11i1.659

Ngwakwe, C.C. (2020). Analysis of budgetary impact of COVID-19 in South Africa: Implications beyond COVID. Journal of Public Administration, 55(3/1), 450–460. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-jpad-v55-n3-1-a3

National Treasury. (2020b). Instruction No. 05 of 2020/2021: Emergency procurement in response to national state of disaster. Pretoria. Available at: http://www.treasury.gov.za/comm_media/press/2020/Instruction%205.pdf [Accessed 07 December 2020].

DOI: 10.1108/GKMC-02-2019-0026

DOI: 10.14512/gaia.28.2.8

Parker, D. (2008). ‘Monitoring and evaluation, and the knowledge function’, in UNICEF (ed.), Bridging the Gap the role of monitoring and evaluation in evidence-based policy making, (12th ed.). UNICEF.

DOI: 10.4102/aej.v1i1.25

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511806384

Republic of South Africa. (2013). The Protection of Personal Information, 2013 (Act No. 41 of 2013), Government Printers, Pretoria.

Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (4th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1785105

South African Monitoring and Evaluation Association (SAMEA). (2013). 4th Biennial SAMEA Conference: September conference materials. Available at: http://www.samea.org.za/index.php?module=pagesetter&type=user&func=viewpub&tid=4&pid=59 [Accessed 18 July 2020].

DOI: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Tafeni, Z. & Mngomezulu, B.R. (2020). A perspective on the budgetary impact of COVID-19 in government departments with specific reference to the Department of Cooperative Governance & Traditional Affairs, Eastern Cape province, South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 54(4), 599–607. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-jpad-v55-n4-a2

The Presidency. (2008). The role of premiers’ offices in government-wide monitoring and evaluation: A good practice guide. Pretoria.

Thornhill, C. & Cloete, J.J.N. (2014). South African municipal government and administration. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

DOI: 10.4102/aej.v3i1.134

United Nation Development. (2014). Theory of change: UNDAF campanion guidance, New York, NY.

DOI: 10.4102/apsdpr.v8i1.328

Van de Waldt, G. (2018). Municipal management: Serving the people. Pretoria: Juta Legal and Academic Publishers.

DOI: 10.1108/09504120910925814

Woodhill, J. (2007). M&E as learning: Rethinking the dominant paradigm, in J. De Graaff, J. Cameron, S. Sombatpanit, C. Pieri & J. Woodhill (eds.), Monitoring and evaluation of soil conservation and watershed development projects, viewed 09 January 2020, from http://www.capfida.mg/km/atelier/wageningen/download.