A dual analysis study of classroom interactions in Japan and South Africa

Abstract

The demands of raising education at a classroom level to international standards require a nuanced analytical lens involving multiple perspectives to contribute to the best practices. Most classroom research adopts a singular perspective, usually from researchers who are familiar with the nuances of the classroom context under study. In other words, published studies involving classroom observations are often analyzed by insiders who already have the insight to understand the situated dynamics of the classroom interactions they analyze. While this is an important analytical orientation, this stance may overlook important insights about teaching and learning that outsiders’ perspectives may be able to identify. The study employed a qualitative approach. Which was guided by the dialogic interactive theory. The methodological approach in Japan was face-to-face semi-structured interviews while in the South African context, virtual data generation methods were employed to interview teachers on the classroom interactions with students. The study population was English students, while in South Africa it was health course teachers who taught students from various health professions. A total of eight teachers were purposively recruited in South Africa with one student participant in Japan. Findings revealed similarities and differences in dialogic interactions and the interpretation of such interactions. Participants from both contexts had deliberate silence and reluctance to speak which was interpreted differently by the teachers, and lack of reciprocal and purposive engagements by students. Based on the dialogic interactive theory, it can be concluded that the aspirations to achieve an inclusive quality of education can best be achieved when teachers are transparent about the expected interactions for all the tenets of the dialogic theory to be achieved. It is therefore recommended that broader conversations about the analysis of situated dynamics of classroom interaction be encouraged to yield critical insights for education towards the attainment of inclusive quality education.

Keywords: {'name': 'Dialogic Interaction, Quality Education, Sustainable Development Goals, Reciprocal Learning, Supportive Learning Environment'}

Authors & affiliations

Roehl Sybing
Affiliation not supplied

Tshimangadzo Selina Mudau
Affiliation not supplied

Deposited references

Supplied references, not a list of publications citing this article.

DOI: 10.4324/9781351040143

DOI: 10.1163/9789004430365_008

DOI: 10.1075/impact.30

DOI: 10.1108/MEQ-12-2020-0299

DOI: 10.5195/dpj.2020.312

DOI: 10.1017/UPO9780980672381.009

Boas, F. (1940). Race, language and culture. Macmillan.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.

DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2020.1837859

DOI: 10.15640/jeds.v8n1a2

DOI: 10.1007/s11125-021-09582-6

DOI: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.11.001

DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-12-2019-0353

DOI: 10.1080/0305764X.2013.819068

DOI: 10.4135/9781529716634

DOI: 10.3916/C74-2023-03

Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). Basic Books.

DOI: 10.4135/9781526441867

Goal 4 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (n.d.). https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4

Goldenberg, C. (1992). Instructional conversations: Promoting comprehension through discussion. The Reading Teacher, 46(4), 316–326.

DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccq046

Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2005). On qualitative inquiry: Approaches to language and literacy research. Teachers College Press.

DOI: 10.1177/1558689816651032

DOI: 10.4324/9781315884516

McCowan, T. (2013). Education as a human right: Principles for a universal entitlement to learning. Bloomsbury.

DOI: 10.14453/aabfj.v17i1.06

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100319

Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. Basic Books.

DOI: 10.17239/L1ESLL-2016.16.02.06

DOI: 10.3102/0002831217730010

DOI: 10.1177/07410883221114152

Sybing, R., & Mudau, S. T. (2022). Considerations and innovations in online learning assessment: A thematic analysis of the literature. In B. K. Sebake, T. Molokwane, M. Hussein, & A. Ndhura (Eds.), Public management and administration in Africa: The quest for resilience in uncertain times (pp. 61-74). Batalea Publishers.

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-7299-7_3

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139173698

DOI: 10.1177/1077800410383121

United Nations Statistics Division. (2023). — SDG indicators. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/

DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12591

Y?ld?r?m, ?., & Uzun, ?. (2021). An overview of dialogic teaching and its impact on learning. International Journal of Education, Technology and Science, 1(2), 135-153.